Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Hypocrisy ''Dating for men is like searching for water in the desert. Dating for women is like searching for water in a swamp''

NEB.feelsdevil

NEB.feelsdevil

The Feelsdevil King
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 21, 2023
Posts
20,071
Normies love gaslighting us into believing that ackshually dating is very difficult for women, too!! :soy::foidSoy:

I'm sure most of us have seen a variation of this analogy. The first half of the analogy about men's experience is indeed true. It is extremely difficult and rare for an average man to have success with women in 2025.

But the other half other analogy about women is straight up gaslighting bullshit. Normies and feminists are SO desperate to create a false equivalency to make it seem that women also ''struggle'' with dating.

A more accurate analogy for women dating would be ''dating for women is like searching for water in a water bottling plant''

Women would be perfectly happy with their own male looksmatch. A mid tier becky with a mid tier normie. An average woman in a water bottling plant would be perfectly hydrated by all bottles, but she is specifically looking for that bottled water with a pH level of 7.0 (Chad).
 
Last edited:
Normies are so fucking DESPERATE to make it seem like dating for women is hard. Another version of the analogy they give is ''dating for women is like searching for fresh water in the ocean''.

Again, implying like women wouldn't be perfectly happy with 90% of the men on dating apps. They totally would. Only their hubris and ego make them think that ONLY CHAD is good enough for them.

A woman opens a dating app and she instantly has 50 possible options, she would be perfectly happy with 90% of them.

But they create artificial difficulty by making it seem like Chad is the ONLY possible option for them. So by that logic, when 90% of men are not Chad, of course it seems ''difficult'' to get Chad when women have to sift through so many subhuman non-Chad men... :feelsseriously:
 
Difficulty in dating for men is getting ANY woman at all.

''Difficulty'' in dating for women is having to sift through so many non-Chad men until finding Chad :society:
 
I think this is about 'no chad for everyone', isn't it? Normies only mask the truth about this.
 
That entire narrative hinges on women basically being flawles and whatever woman a man finds being a perfectly suitable partner. Obviously, that's bullshit. Men have a harder time finding partners, and after that, also have to filter them just like women do.

Across studies, approximately one in seven women (14.6%) and one in eight men (11.8%) experienced IPV victimization, with an overall prevalence of 13.9%. While the gender gap in victimization between men and women has narrowed slightly over time (from 3.8 percentage points to 3.0 percentage points), there has been a remarkable 38% decrease in victimization rates compared with those found in the study by Desmarais et al. (2012a), which were 23.1% for women and 19.3% for men, with an overall pooled prevalence estimate of 22.4%.
Conversely, we found that approximately one in six women (17.5%) and one in nine men (10.6%) had perpetrated physical IPV, with an overall prevalence of 12.9%. Consistent with previous reviews, pooled prevalence was slightly greater for female- compared with male-perpetrated physical IPV.

Rates of Male and Female Physical Victimization and Perpetration in Intimate Relationships: A Comprehensive Review

It's just overall worse for men, and there's no denying it. Men struggle just to get to where women start.
 
Demographic projections definitely won't help to this female hypergamic situation. And of course, no one in rule will do shit about the male surplus problem (except letting everyone into the West free of charge).
 
Over for hydrationcels
Cat Water GIF
 
So why do they live in the swamp? All of these analogies and shits completely hinge on men's worth only being in their physical appearance. As if everything men have built and continue to maintain is foids' birthright or something. By continuing to merely humor these retarded analogies, you continue to get played about them. You're not arguing at that point, just bargaining (with evil pieces of shits).
 
Last edited:
male surplus problem
No guy can actually tell why it is a problem except for the fact that it reduces his chances of getting a worthless hole, who'd internally loathe him and would happily kill him if the opportunity presented itself. You, at the very least, deserve your inceldom, you cuck.
 
No guy can actually tell why it is a problem except for the fact that it reduces his chances of getting a worthless hole, who'd internally loathe him and would happily kill him if the opportunity presented itself. You, at the very least, deserve your inceldom, you cuck.
How is that cuckoldry and why are you resorting to insults? That is a fact, but anyways, keep kicking your legs away like the whinny child you are.
 
Normies love gaslighting us into believing that ackshually dating is very difficult for women, too!! :soy::foidSoy:

I'm sure most of us have seen a variation of this analogy. The first half of the analogy about men's experience is indeed true. It is extremely difficult and rare for an average man to have success with women in 2025.

But the other half other analogy about women is straight up gaslighting bullshit. Normies and feminists are SO desperate to create a false equivalency to make it seem that women also ''struggle'' with dating.

A more accurate analogy for women dating would be ''dating for women is like searching for water in a water bottling plant''

Women would be perfectly happy with their own male looksmatch. A mid tier becky with a mid tier normie. An average woman in a water bottling plant would be perfectly hydrated by all bottles, but she is specifically looking for that bottled water with a pH level of 7.0 (Chad).
Its not really wrong though
 
Its not really wrong though
It's not wrong in the sense that women do have a lot of options that they don't like.

But my point is that it is wrong because it implies that 90% of women's options are terrible and unviable. Let's be real, women would actually be happy with 90% of the options on the dating apps.

Women don't actually NEED a Chad to be happy. Only their insane egos and standards dictate them to pursue Chads.

But the average women would be perfectly fine with average Joe.
 
Difficulty in dating for men is getting ANY woman at all.

''Difficulty'' in dating for women is having to sift through so many non-Chad men until finding Chad :society:
 
Normies are so fucking DESPERATE to make it seem like dating for women is hard. Another version of the analogy they give is ''dating for women is like searching for fresh water in the ocean''.

Again, implying like women wouldn't be perfectly happy with 90% of the men on dating apps. They totally would. Only their hubris and ego make them think that ONLY CHAD is good enough for them.

A woman opens a dating app and she instantly has 50 possible options, she would be perfectly happy with 90% of them.

But they create artificial difficulty by making it seem like Chad is the ONLY possible option for them. So by that logic, when 90% of men are not Chad, of course it seems ''difficult'' to get Chad when women have to sift through so many subhuman non-Chad men... :feelsseriously:

And even then the time frame it takes for some fat roastie to get fucked by Chad is a tiny fraction of how long it takes for even a HTN to get interaction with women.
 
Normies love gaslighting us into believing that ackshually dating is very difficult for women, too!! :soy::foidSoy:

I'm sure most of us have seen a variation of this analogy. The first half of the analogy about men's experience is indeed true. It is extremely difficult and rare for an average man to have success with women in 2025.

But the other half other analogy about women is straight up gaslighting bullshit. Normies and feminists are SO desperate to create a false equivalency to make it seem that women also ''struggle'' with dating.

A more accurate analogy for women dating would be ''dating for women is like searching for water in a water bottling plant''

Women would be perfectly happy with their own male looksmatch. A mid tier becky with a mid tier normie. An average woman in a water bottling plant would be perfectly hydrated by all bottles, but she is specifically looking for that bottled water with a pH level of 7.0 (Chad).
Women want to be included in all aspects of male life (ie: Dating struggles)
 
If by "swamp" they mean Miami or New Orleans and by "desert" they mean ISIS-occupied Tunisia, I would agree that women live in a swamp and men live in a desert.
 
Good point. How is it that they cant be happy with all of these men, unless they're willing to openly say that men in general are pieces of shit... ? But oh please notice that this is EXACTLY what foids do half the time anyway, and even the media goes along : you're a man without a Degr3e what a loser :foidSoy::soy: and yadda yadda.

But then in other instances they will play it cool and pretend how it's all cool and gender neutral and kumbaya, wtf ??!! This reeks of dishonesty.

And it does so because it IS dishonest, because as i explained this problem obviously implies hypergamy in itself but they're not willing to openly proclaim their distaste for the male gender in general.

In short this pretentious quote has the gal to proclaim that the problem is dualistic (therefore, in some way, balanced) when in reality it's a pure dichotomy (there's no equivalence between men's and women's problems). It's typical faulty logic, manipulation and normie bullshit spiel with implications they dont have the balls to own with honesty.
 
Last edited:
It's also very feminine. This kind of bullshit could only have seen the light of day in a feminized world. It's something that also became very prevalent irl. People hurting others while looking like the good one. Attacking, despising, ostracizing others and never owning it. This gives me some funny ideas tbh.
 
Last edited:
Good take tbh

This quote really highlights things, it shows how for men things are incredibly awful, yet how for foids they seemingly view the vast majority of us as disposable trash
Good point. How is it that they cant be happy with all of these men, unless they're willing to openly say that men in general are pieces of shit... ? But oh please notice that this is EXACTLY what foids do half the time anyway, and even the media goes along : you're a man without a Degr3e what a loser :foidSoy::soy: and yadda yadda.
The fact that foids have all of these options, even around her looksmatch, yet they refuse to go with them just says it all
But then in other instances they will play it cool and pretend how it's all cool and gender neutral and kumbaya, wtf ??!! This reeks of dishonesty.
Foids inconsistency to maintain their alleged "values" are really telling tbh, how do many normies not notice this?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top