Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory [Controversial: In Defense of Standardcels] The Concept of Settling with Your Looksmatch is Gynocentric Thinking

Zer0/∞

Zer0/∞

Incelius Savage is The Godfather of Inceldom
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 23, 2021
Posts
22,561
If women expect a man more socially and financially successful, fitter, better looking, taller, entertains her and her friends constantly (jestermaxxing), has many interesting hobbies, and even owns a house and car when most men only consider her age and attractiveness, why should you have to settle for the bare minimum especially when most women wear fakeup and do surgery that makes the average woman have the potential to look stacylite? :bigbrain:
1649098051846
1649098284824


By neglecting this asymmetrical sexual selection, you are putting pussy on a pedestal and making hypergamy worse for the next man. This is gynocentric thinking and by holding no standards, you are far more cucked than even an escortcel. :feelsugh:
 
Last edited:
@Transcended Trucel
 
looksmatching works when foids wear no fakeup :feelsthink::feelsthink:
 
I wouldn't have an issue with it if normie and incel-tier men actualy had a chance to date a decent foid.
 
nope it's based the looksmatch, the prob is that she want giga chad
 
I'll take whatever comes in my way, in a pump and dump fashion ofc
 
Based thread but we already knew this didnt we but the normies will still pretend that these standards don't exist.Just take a shower bro,farrrrrk
 
big truth and I agree. Better off escortcelling than settling for less than what you'd truly enjoy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top