The argument goes that incels are incels because of our bad personalities and the fact that we post misogynistic things on the internet. When asked how women in real life would know about our anonymous online activities, proponents of said argument typically respond by claiming that our misogynistic attitudes show through subtle behavioural signs that can be "sensed" by the women around us.
Ok. Let's assume that was true. This would mean that women are extremely sensitive to any indicator of a "bad personality" and manage to sort out men having such "bad personalities" with astounding accuracy, to a point that even someone who merely shitposts on obscure incel forums a few times a week immediately strikes them as a disgusting misogynist despite seemingly acting like a normie on the outside.
This would then also apply to potential domestic abusers. Since women are so great and infallible at picking up on personality traits, a man who'd lay his hands on a woman would also easily be identified as such, yet women still end up dating these men. Therefore, they voluntarily enter abusive relationship with men they know are abusive.
Common sense dictates that the consequences of voluntarily putting yourself in situations you know will carry said negative consequences are your own fault, and thus victims of domestic abuse are at fault for their own supposed victimhood, according to the "incels are incels because of their bad personalities" argument.
So, bluepillers, make your choice: Admit that your argument is based on incorrect presuppositions and is therefore invalid, or accept the notion that abuse victims are at fault for their own abuse as a logical consequence of your argument.
Ok. Let's assume that was true. This would mean that women are extremely sensitive to any indicator of a "bad personality" and manage to sort out men having such "bad personalities" with astounding accuracy, to a point that even someone who merely shitposts on obscure incel forums a few times a week immediately strikes them as a disgusting misogynist despite seemingly acting like a normie on the outside.
This would then also apply to potential domestic abusers. Since women are so great and infallible at picking up on personality traits, a man who'd lay his hands on a woman would also easily be identified as such, yet women still end up dating these men. Therefore, they voluntarily enter abusive relationship with men they know are abusive.
Common sense dictates that the consequences of voluntarily putting yourself in situations you know will carry said negative consequences are your own fault, and thus victims of domestic abuse are at fault for their own supposed victimhood, according to the "incels are incels because of their bad personalities" argument.
So, bluepillers, make your choice: Admit that your argument is based on incorrect presuppositions and is therefore invalid, or accept the notion that abuse victims are at fault for their own abuse as a logical consequence of your argument.
