Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Christianity has Catholics/Protestants. Islam has Sunni/Shia.

Which sect are you in?

  • Height > Face

    Votes: 14 56.0%
  • Face > Height

    Votes: 11 44.0%

  • Total voters
    25
B33troot

B33troot

Captain
Joined
Jun 12, 2023
Posts
1,585
Inceldom has Face > Height / Height > Face.

Just an observation.
 
It doesn’t matter
 
Height is clearly better than face. For the simple fact that it's incredibly rare for a woman to date someone shorter than her. Average male height differs from women by 2 standard deviations so you'd expect to see 5% of couples where the woman is taller. We know it is nowhere near this common and one study I found shows the likely hood was 1/720 couples had the female being taller.


Gillis and Avis (1980) found that in only 1 out of 720 US/UK couples, the female was taller [19]. Because women are on average shorter than men, chance predicts that the occurrence of couples in which the female is taller is 2 out of 100, 14 times higher than the observed 1 out of 720 (see [12] for a recent study replicating this finding in a Western population).

This to me shows that women are forgoing relationships with shorter, pretty boys to pursue relationships with taller, uglier men. That's not to say face is meaningless but compared to height it's not as important to foids.
 
Neither matter to me specifically because it's over either way.
 
We know it is nowhere near this common and one study I found shows the likely hood was 1/720 couples had the female being taller.
Blackpilled again. @based_meme
 
Id take being 6'2 with a 4/10 face than a 5'9 with a 7/10 face any day
 
Incels have revolutionaries/rotters
 
Height is clearly better than face. For the simple fact that it's incredibly rare for a woman to date someone shorter than her. Average male height differs from women by 2 standard deviations so you'd expect to see 5% of couples where the woman is taller. We know it is nowhere near this common and one study I found shows the likely hood was 1/720 couples had the female being taller.


Gillis and Avis (1980) found that in only 1 out of 720 US/UK couples, the female was taller [19]. Because women are on average shorter than men, chance predicts that the occurrence of couples in which the female is taller is 2 out of 100, 14 times higher than the observed 1 out of 720 (see [12] for a recent study replicating this finding in a Western population).

This to me shows that women are forgoing relationships with shorter, pretty boys to pursue relationships with taller, uglier men. That's not to say face is meaningless but compared to height it's not as important to foids.
And face can be easier fixed than being short.
And being tall brings you a lot of non-dating advantages, i.e. you get respected more etc.
Few men get mocked for their face but making fun about short guys is absolutely standard.
 
Tall ugly guys get ignored, short pretty boys get either pitied or mocked.
A nice face without height is useless, tallness in itself is a standalone-plus even if your face is ugly
 
Zayn Malik and Cillian Murphy and James Dean are perfect example of face>height.
 
You are either incel or you are not. You usually cannot pinpoint it to a single feature and it's usually not a single feature but a collection of defects.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top