If an "Incel Civil War" broke out on incels.is, here’s how each notable user, marked with their respective handle, might react:
### 1. @Deep.Nest ("El Violador")
- Role in Conflict**: Likely an instigator or aggressor. Given his desire for notoriety, he would probably lead a radical faction focused on extreme ideological purity, willing to take drastic measures to make his mark.
- **Motivation**: He’d see the civil war as an opportunity to gain significance, similar to his desire for recognition through radical change, even if it’s through negative means【228†source】.
### 2. @VideoGameCoper
- **Role in Conflict**: Likely a mediator or observer. With his laid-back, humorous demeanor, he would prefer to watch the conflict unfold, possibly aligning with a less radical faction, using sarcasm to keep things light.
- **Motivation**: He may align with those who want to avoid unnecessary escalation, preferring to ridicule the absurdity of the conflict rather than get involved in direct fighting【62†source】.
### 3. @Scatius Deletus
- **Role in Conflict**: Would align with or lead an extremist faction. His confrontational nature and history of escalating arguments suggest he’d embrace a civil war as an opportunity to purge "fakecels."
- **Motivation**: He would want to test and enforce ideological purity, using the war to call out and eliminate anyone he deems as insufficiently committed to the incel movement【41†source】.
### 4. @Animecel2D
- **Role in Conflict**: A neutral figure, using irony and humor to engage with both sides. He would likely stay detached and use sarcasm to poke fun at the war, not committing fully to any side.
- **Motivation**: He would see the conflict as unnecessary, using it to create ironic content and critique the seriousness of other users' actions, avoiding full engagement【217†source】.
### 5. @TheTroonAnnihilator
- **Role in Conflict**: Align with the radical faction, likely spurring on more extreme behavior and radical ideology. His stance on "dollmaxxing" and rejection of societal values would push him towards the more anti-social wing of the conflict.
- **Motivation**: He might use the opportunity to further advocate for non-normative relationships, positioning himself against any moderate voices that support societal norms【78†source】.
### 6. @Da_Yunez ("Makimacel")
- **Role in Conflict**: Chaotic-neutral participant. He would probably use the conflict as a source of content, making humorous and provocative edits, mocking the seriousness of the factions.
- **Motivation**: For @Da_Yunez, the war would be a chance to create NSFW content and memes, using the chaos for comedic relief without a real commitment to either side【89†source】.
### 7. @Morphine
- **Role in Conflict**: Might prefer staying on the sidelines, throwing in sarcastic comments. He could align with whichever side seemed less radical while actively avoiding direct involvement.
- **Motivation**: He would focus on maintaining a somewhat calm demeanor, preventing the conflict from escalating to ridiculous extremes, and participating only to criticize or make light of the situation【118†source】.
### 8. @Retardfuel
- **Role in Conflict**: Aggressive participant in the extremist faction. He would take this as an opportunity to provoke and intensify the situation, using dark humor to escalate conflicts further.
- **Motivation**: He’d use the war as a stage to demonstrate his aggressive stance and potentially purge those whom he feels do not fit the true ideology of inceldom【110†source】.
### Relationships and Factions:
- **Radical Blackpill Purists**:
- @Deep.Nest, @Scatius Deletus, @Retardfuel, and @TheTroonAnnihilator would likely form the extremist faction. This group would advocate for strict adherence to blackpill ideology, targeting anyone perceived as conciliatory or insufficiently committed.
- Ironically Detached Observers**:
- @VideoGameCoper, @Animecel2D, @Morphine, and @Da_Yunez would represent those who see the conflict as unnecessary. They’d prefer to make ironic or sarcastic comments, aiming to lighten the mood and criticize the senseless fighting.
### Outcome:
- The **Radical Blackpill Purists** would likely intensify the fragmentation of the community, creating a heavily paranoid atmosphere where users are under constant scrutiny for their ideological commitment.
- @VideoGameCoper and others in the ironically detached group would use humor and sarcasm to attempt to undermine the seriousness of the conflict, potentially gaining more support from members who are disillusioned by the extremism of the radicals.
- The community would fragment into smaller sub-groups, with the aggressive faction alienating many users and the more moderate or detached participants either stepping away or forming their own smaller, more flexible alliances.
Overall, the hypothetical incel civil war would deepen divisions, increase mistrust, and potentially cause the incels.is community to fragment into isolated factions—each more disillusioned, radical, or resigned than before.