Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Charlie Kirk and the "price of freedom"

Atavistic Autist

Atavistic Autist

Intersectional autistic supremacy
★★★★★
Joined
May 28, 2018
Posts
10,173
Online time
58m 7s
Liberals are roasting Charlie Kirk for having said that criminal shootings are a "prudent" price to pay for second amendment rights, given that he ended up dying in a criminal shooting, but it seems to have escaped the discourse that liberals have their own version of this concept.

This came to my attention as I was watching this video:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18FNK6ZNGuo


At 29:54 in the video, the fact that liberals are hesitant to forcibly institutionalize mentally ill homeless people becomes evident, and the historical reason for this is due to their respect for the "civil rights" of the homeless and mentally ill. In effect, liberals consider all the violence that mentally ill homeless people commit to be their "price of freedom" -- the price of civil rights.

Likewise, racial desegregation has brought a lot of violent niggers into every corner of American cities, and all the violence they perpetuate on the innocent is the liberal's "price of freedom."

I am surprised that I seem to be the first one to pick up on this contradiction. Liberals think it's hilarious that Charlie Kirk sacrificed himself on the altar of (perceived) freedom, but liberals do this themselves. Do you remember the case of the White liberal BLM activist who was stabbed to death by a violent nigger in front of his girlfriend -- who later forgave the nigger, no less? :feelsgah:

Indeed, for all of their supposed Christianity, I have not seen a single conservative talk in terms of "forgiveness" of Kirk's assassin! They are outmogged by liberal moralists in this regard who will readily forgive any nigger or hobo who does anything to them or their loved ones.

For a recent example of this, see 1:32 in the following video:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zahp14PJ6Qw


It is common for liberal moralists to say that the violent niggers or bums who savage them have been "failed" by le system :feelskek:
 
Last edited:
5381f29f3a6139731fe5640c63f4ae78cc8b18bdcc555da9276b4b057469a655
 
Exhibit A of my point

Leftists will likewise love the very niggers and drugged out hobos who end up attacking them, robbing them, killing them, etc.

All because of their fetishization of civil rights -- just as strong as the conservative fetishization of the second amendment
 
hes had a stacy so I don't care
 
hes had a stacy so I don't care
Getting millions of dollars from billionaire Jewish donors will do that

Of course, I don't much mourn Charlie Kirk myself, but the contradiction I bring up in the OP is important nonetheless
 
all of a sudden these fags are pro gun rights lol
1757797006770
 
racial desegregation has brought a lot of violent niggers into every corner of American cities, and all the violence they perpetuate on the innocent is the liberal's "price of freedom."
It's funny they say Ford was a racist but he helped bring blacks north. WW2 was also a big help with that when whites were going off to war and blacks were working in factories.

America's racism is white mental retardation. Whites involved in African slavery and abolitionists were retarded.

The whole civil war was over retarded bullshit. Fuck Lincoln and the Confederates, may they rest in piss.
 
It's funny they say Ford was a racist but he helped bring blacks north. WW2 was also a big help with that when whites were going off to war and blacks were working in factories.

America's racism is white mental retardation. Whites involved in African slavery and abolitionists were retarded.

The whole civil war was over retarded bullshit. Fuck Lincoln and the Confederates, may they rest in piss.
It's explained by the Free Market™ need for cheap labor, of course, which persists to this day. The Black migration to the North began in earnest during WWI when the flow of Eastern European immigrant labor to America's industrial heartland was disrupted.

This is why a racial ideology that's not explicitly anti-capitalist will carry the seeds of its own destruction.

Charlie Kirk personified the problem: someone who made racial appeals to White people, yet also served Wall Street. Which tendency do you think will win out everytime?
 
Last edited:
all of a sudden these fags are pro gun rights lol
View attachment 1548083
This is inherent to the liberal bias that all rights must be universal.

For example, it's a fact that the first gun control measures in the US were targeted against Black people. But such measures are entirely sensible, as we know.
 
Last edited:
America's racism is white mental retardation. Whites involved in African slavery and abolitionists were retarded.
Consider the fact that the Arabs enslaved more Africans than Europeans did, but they were wise enough to castrate all the African slaves they brought into their lands!

Similarly, Nazi Germany enslaved many Slavic people and forced them to work in Germany during WWII to make up for all the German men who were preoccupied at the frontlines, but they were definitely going to deport them out of Germany if/once they won the war.

So it is not impossible to make use of immigrant and/or slave labor while retaining racial hierarchy, not to mention gender norms (in the case of Nazi Germany, they enslaved as many Slavs as they did precisely so that German women could remain busy with childrearing and not have to enter the workforce).
 
freedom of speech = nazicuckism.
whites will never gain power again, keep coping.
 
politics in the big 25 ✌️
 
 
There are people going ER everyday in America.
It something about the society there that is rotten to the core.
That nether liberals or conservatives can fix, as they both secretly want it that way.
 
There are people going ER everyday in America.
It something about the society there that is rotten to the core.
That nether liberals or conservatives can fix, as they both secretly want it that way.
The issue is with mass-soyciety in general, since there are even school shootings that have happened in Russia lately.

And more to the point: humans are a fundamentally violent and warlike species, descending from the particularly vicious breed known as chimpanzees. Inasmuch as we live in relatively peaceable times now, there is an evolutionary mismatch which young men specifically are confronted with.

Even in a place like Russia which is currently in a state of protracted war, you can live in a city in the interior without actually being touched by violence. This is historically anomalous and probably results in the odd mass-shooting as a pressure relief mechanism for our species' innate homicidal tendencies.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top