Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Change The "Do Not Sexualize Minors" Rule.

Y

YellowCarrot

Banned
-
Joined
Oct 26, 2022
Posts
1,793
Online
2d 17h 37m
It's such a retarded and inconsistent rule and needs to change, According to the logic of this forum,

Advocating for rape, Talking about going ER and celebrating tragedies = Ok

Talking about Age-Cucks and Age-cuckoldry = 100% ban

How does that make sense? If you're worried that the forum might get shut down if you allow it then I don't see why you don't just go full reddit and censor all "Hate speech"

Leftist groups will still be unhappy with this forum regardless, Kiwifams had a similar rule and that did not stop them from being shut down, Leftist groups will still campaign for this forum to be shut down for "Hate speech" Or "Promoting rape and violence"

Age-cucks are also foid worshippers and white knights, They white knight and simp for JB's and demonize the men who date them as "Pedos" And "Groomers" How is that not white knighting and foid worship?

They basically just want men to date used up roasties and betabuxx, They are huge cuckolds, You are contradicting yourself by having such a rule.

Just change it to "Do not sexualize pre pubescent children" That makes a lot more sense.

@Sheogorath @basementLDARcel
 
CurryLMAO

CurryLMAO

kill me
★★
Joined
Aug 11, 2022
Posts
2,657
Online
18d 7h 14m
Yes it should be changed, even looksmax doesn't have this rule

Also @BlackPilledOverdose should be freed
 
Incline

Incline

Im gymmaxxing now going taiwan/phili in 2 years.
★★★★★
Joined
May 1, 2019
Posts
12,484
Online
97d 16h 12m
I don't have a problem with this rule

I have a problem of it being applied to 2D hentai, now that is retarded asf.
 
Man

Man

Manliest man
★★
Joined
Jul 11, 2022
Posts
1,678
Online
21d 13h 38m
Mods don't actually care.

We have the rule because of the dipshits who own our website find it distasteful and will withdraw services if we allow it.
 
Last edited:
InMemoriam

InMemoriam

Secret Schizoid
Joined
Feb 19, 2022
Posts
5,037
Online
61d 17h 30m
lifefuel

lifefuel

Captain
★★★
Joined
Nov 12, 2017
Posts
1,768
Online
45d 6h 9m
I'm moving to Estonia
 
Retardinator

Retardinator

Not made for this world
Joined
Sep 5, 2022
Posts
3,545
Online
35d 7h 0m
It's such a retarded and inconsistent rule and needs to change, According to the logic of this forum,

Advocating for rape, Talking about going ER and celebrating tragedies = Ok

Talking about Age-Cucks and Age-cuckoldry = 100% ban

How does that make sense? If you're worried that the forum might get shut down if you allow it then I don't see why you don't just go full reddit and censor all "Hate speech"

Leftist groups will still be unhappy with this forum regardless, Kiwifams had a similar rule and that did not stop them from being shut down, Leftist groups will still campaign for this forum to be shut down for "Hate speech" Or "Promoting rape and violence"

Age-cucks are also foid worshippers and white knights, They white knight and simp for JB's and demonize the men who date them as "Pedos" And "Groomers" How is that not white knighting and foid worship?

They basically just want men to date used up roasties and betabuxx, They are huge cuckolds, You are contradicting yourself by having such a rule.

Just change it to "Do not sexualize pre pubescent children" That makes a lot more sense.

@Sheogorath @basementLDARcel
Agree
Yes it should be changed, even looksmax doesn't have this rule

Also @BlackPilledOverdose should be freed
:yes:
 
Oroborus

Oroborus

Temp. Banned
-
Joined
Sep 14, 2020
Posts
8,015
Online
158d 6h 39m
PointOfNoReturn

PointOfNoReturn

no qt schizo Arab gf = over
Joined
Aug 25, 2022
Posts
4,081
Online
31d 8h 13m
See you in ban appeals, fag.

Your posts history seems suspicious.
 
subhuman

subhuman

Born to die. Forced to live.
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 9, 2022
Posts
9,301
Online
69d 2h 4m
I don’t have a problem with it because I’m not a pedophile. Go back to ***
 
Sheogorath

Sheogorath

Daedric Prince of Madness disguised as an incel
★★★★★
Joined
May 20, 2018
Posts
17,294
Online
94d 16h 52m
It's such a retarded and inconsistent rule
How long were you lurking prior to registering 3 days ago OP?

You're probably going to come across as mods as someone's alt.

and needs to change
Need is never absolute, it is subjective to a purpose - what would changing the rule accomplish? Make a complete argument.

Advocating for rape, Talking about going ER and celebrating tragedies = Ok
Talking about Age-Cucks and Age-cuckoldry = 100% ban
That is because sub-18 women are less corrupted than post-18 women
We must protect them.
Less of consequence is lost if post-18 roasties are raped or killed so mods do not prioritize protecting them as they do protecting minors from sexualization.

Due to the heroism of the mods, since we do not "sexualize" sub-18 women, this keeps them pure virgins and elevates society.
We are heroes purifying the world.

How does that make sense? If you're worried that the forum might get shut down if you allow it then I don't see why you don't just go full reddit and censor all "Hate speech"
give them time
but prob because they're prioritizing what they think will unify normies against us, which is "think of the chillins"
normies share our apathy to roasty sluts and don't care if we allow some members to glorify ER because secretly the normies glorify ER too
I wish they wouldn't, I dislike ER personally.

Leftist groups will still be unhappy with this forum regardless, Kiwifams had a similar rule and that did not stop them from being shut down, Leftist groups will still campaign for this forum to be shut down for "Hate speech" Or "Promoting rape and violence"
yes but they won't be able to argue we are pedophiles since pedophilia has always been banned here, and that is good, because the left glorifies homosexuality and child molestation enough without us adding to that problem

Age-cucks are also foid worshippers and white knights
I don't agree with that. Ragecucks do not necessarily worship women, they just recognize that sub-18 women maintaining their precious virginity to give to us is important.
With the mods heroically standing against sexualization we have supported female innocence being maintained so we can marry virgin women.

They white knight and simp for JB's
Bro you look like a moron putting an apostrophe there.

and demonize the men who date them as "Pedos" And "Groomers" How is that not white knighting and foid worship?
Calling men groomers is pretty rare around here, I've only seen it when they went after that 23yo dude who seduced a 13yo girl from IT, forget his name but he had an impressive Steam collection.

They basically just want men to date used up roasties and betabuxx, They are huge cuckolds
A cuckold is someone who doesn't know he's being duped - someone willingly engaging in degeneracy is not a cuckold so we call them BIDAES here.

You are contradicting yourself by having such a rule.
Explain contradiction please.

Just change it to "Do not sexualize pre pubescent children" That makes a lot more sense.
@Sheogorath @basementLDARcel
They changed it to that and had it that way for several months but then reverted it back.

I expect they did not realize at the time how early it is that puberty started, or perhaps were under the misconception that "pre-pubescent" referred to "before puberty completes" rather than it's actual definition which is "before puberty begins".

It may have been the intent of mods all along to outlaw "sexualizing" girls who were mid-pubescent and the wording was meant to allow sexualizing post-pubescent minors, such as girls who were 16/17 who were minors but had completed puberty with tanner 5 characteristics.

The current wording also bans sexualizing these post-pubescent minors (17 year olds who have been physical adults for years) and I don't know how important they think it is to legalize that.

I do think however that what is meant by the term "sexualizing" would benefit from elaboration.

I believe it means 'to render sexual' which begs the question - can you render sexual something which is already sexual?

Or does sexualize possibly mean "to render MORE sexual" in which case it can imply to overemphasizing sexuality for a sexual being?

I don’t have a problem with it because I’m not a pedophile. Go back to ***
It is IT tier argument to label men pedophiles for having a problem with a rule.

Pedophilia is a fixation on pre-adolescent boys, like the Jew Rabbi Mohels who suck their penises in their Metzitza ritual.

We are not talking about pre-adolescent boys (homosexuality is banned here)

We are also not talking about pre-adolescent (Tanner 1) girls (they would still be banned by the previous "no pre-pubescent minors" rule).

What we are talking about here are two more normal categories of things for men to be attracted to:
1) mid-adolescent minor women (preteen to mid-teens foids who are Tanner 2-4)​
2) post-adolescent minor women (mid-teen to late-teen foids who are Tanner 5)​

The tactic of calling attraction to either of these categories "pedophilia" is a tactic by the lefties who took over the APA in the 1940s after the influx of Jews from Europe after NSDAP expelled them for promoting pedophilia and transexuality in Germany.

They wanted to make actual pedophilia (IE the mohels sucking the little boy cock) seem more prevalent by labeling a wider variety of things pedophilia.

This is why they got the APA to reclassify normal male heterosexual spectrum (korophilia and parthenophilia) as pedophilia.

Those who co-operate with that change in nomenclature are supporting the pedophile agenda.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Sheogorath
Replies
22
Views
748
Sheogorath
Sheogorath
InMemoriam
Replies
15
Views
472
Cybersex is our hope
Cybersex is our hope
subhuman
Replies
123
Views
3K
_meh
_meh
AsiaCel
Replies
11
Views
443
Fat Link
Fat Link
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape7
shape8
Top