Johny.speiz
Incel revolution
★★★★
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2018
- Posts
- 1,799
I am Racialist, I strongly believe in Race, its cohesion and purity. Yet, I am not Racist, since I do not support any kind of "Master vs Slave" relation, Racism is nothing more than a relation between these 2 elements. People who consider being "superior" than others are racists. Racism is strong in Asia. Europe has no problem with Racism, on the contrary, it is the most anti-Racist place on Earth. We, Europeans must return to our primordial, European Racialism (yes, European Race, exists)and combine it with anti-Racist, anti-xenophobic policies, eased on National-Corporatist values.Repeat once again. Nationalism is an artifcial creation and there is nothing natural about it. Nationalism is a bastard of French Revolution (the same that you criticize so much, and you're right in this case). Maximilian Robespierre was the first nationalist being in power and he destroyed France. He contributed to murder of a King (guarding Natural Law in France), he created a first (((nation-state))), which is actually a state run by extremely dumb mob manipulated by Jewish-paid demagogues. Rise of nationalism is directly connected to rise of liberalism, because in fact idea of a nation as a political factor requires the idea of universal suffrage to arise. Nationalism equals liberalism and greatly contributed to creation of degeneracy, which is ruling Western world right now. No. Religions rise from spiritual outlook of it's creators. And this outlook is greatly shaped by race and personal experience of these creators. And there are prophetic and non-prophetic religions (paganism is for example non-prophetic), so there is nothing common about origins of most widespread religions. Marxism is a secular form of Christianity. It is based on the same principle of absolute universal equality. The difference is that Christianity (mostly) keeps this equality spiritual, and Marxism wants to reach these equality in our current life. When you speak about a nature of Paganism, I can even agree with you to some degree, but you need to notice that paganism wasn't based on absolute spiritual equality of mankind. Therefore, initiations and esoterism were not forbidden and ridiculed, so the religion of peasant and diviner could be not exactly the same. Consumptionism is simply a outcome of mixture between reformist Marxism and liberal capitalism. But I agree with you, there must always be a factor which is binding socjety together. But nationalism simply isn't useful for this in my opinion. Nope. Nationalism isn't a modern form of tribalism. Tribes weren't egalitarian at all, they had it's social stratification. And nationalism is an idea of egalitarian (if nation is a sovereign, egalitarianism in it is desired) centralised nation-state, which is based around language (because we do not have any other factor of national allegiance apart from language and personal consciouness). This idea is dangerous for white race, who is an objective biological fact rather than a delusion of Jewish-alligned intelectuals like a nationalism. Hungarians have these strong nationalist urges, because their motherland was humiliated and deprived from the lands, which belonged to it since Middle Ages. This is laughable. Sarmatian period was a period of biggest fucking degeneracy in the whole history of Poland and I'm glad that it was ended by a partitions. It created a state based on universal suffrage of nobility, opposition against strong leadership, civic citizenship, cult of freedom, pacifism and early feminism. And it's ridiculously similar to .........(((current West))), isn't it? 1. As an every state in the world, that's why we need to create a state seeking only an interest of white race. 2. That's why we need to end nationalism, it causes only more brother wars between whites. 3. Democracy is a lie. Mob will always be dumb. German National Socialism wasn't about Aryanism. The sincere Aryanists were murdered by Hitler in 1934. And from then Hitler twisted an Aryan ideal, using it as a pawn for his own ((((nationialistic))) agenda. Hitler was a Rotschild whose job was to murder as many Aryans as possible (therefore his (((anti-slavism))) based on leftist lies from XIXth century) and help to create an Israel state. Slavs are white Indoeuropeans, akin to Germans and Balts and not noticing this fact is caused by believing in myths created by Jews to divide whites. And what do you say isn't true, Sarmatians weren't that close to Slavs (they were predominantly of R1b haplogroup) and in fact northern Norwegians (predominantly of R1a haplogroup) are closer to Slavs than Sarmatians. Slavs do have a lot of Iranian cultular influence (for exapmple the Polish word bóg meaning god comes from Iranian), but it is unclear which ancient Iranian group was a factor which brought this influence to Slavs.
Nazi Germany was a Jewish puppet state where Adolf Hitler (in fact, (((Rothschild))) ) used Prussian and German tradition as a facade in carrying out Rotschild plan of destruction of white race, created by Nathan Rotschild. Prussia was much different than it. Frederick the Great didn't care what language someone spoke, as long as said person obeyed his orders (for example, Frederick the Great was a good friend of Pole, bishop Krasicki, which would be unlikely in Hitler's case). I don't support a current state of EU. I suport the violent revolution against Brussels elite aiming to create and united, white and pagan Europe. But for this to happen, we need first an united European state, because without it the revolutionary movement will be taken over by a nationalists. The factor, which can unify society is race.
There is no need to be racist, You do not understand, the meaning of this word, I presume. Racism has nothing to do with Race or even ethnicity, but with "Master-Slave relation". Word "racism" was used to describe the relations between the Masters of one race and slaves of other Race. What's very interesting, it was not White vs Black relation, because slavery lasted for long centuries, before the Age of Discovery. And it were Arabs and Jews, who were mostly responsible for slave trade proceedings, between Africa and European colonies. It is completely unknown theme and many people, from Africa, but also from USA are trying to show, who were truly responsible for this centuries-lasting process. I can fully say, that Europe is full of racism, nowadays. It is especially visible in West vs East divide. Western Europeans treats Eastern Europe in clearly, 100% racist way. Mentality of Westerners is clearly racist, they considers themselves as "superior Masters". It is visible in everything from Liberal arrogance, lecturing of Poland, Hungary, but also in economic policy
So, dear Western "equality" proponents, what are you trying to do now, to show your pro-equality mentality, towards Eastern Europe?
I would say more, genetics, but history too, says, that about 1/3 of contemporary "pure blood Germans" have Slavic origin. Nearly all former East Germany was a Slavic territory, Berlin was built by Slavic tribes, whole Macklemburg-Vorpommern was Slavic, islands like Rumia were centres of slavic religious cults, especially in Arkona. Basically, Germany is not even Germanic, it is rather Celtic, so called Hallstadt culture was in based in todays Bavaria. France theoretically is Celtic, Galia was, but after the Germanic, Frankish especially colonization, it became much more germanised. For me, whole northern France is more Germanic than Celtic/Roman. Europe, especially its central territory is nothing more than a meltic pot. Poland is even more mixed than Germany, Celts were living here too, Germanic tribes were living here for ages, until 5th century A. D. Slavic tribes, so called Venedae (I am not sure if they were Slavs)were living in eastern Poland, central Ukraine and Belarus, so aditec made huge mistake writing about "russian lands". Russia was created in 18th century, before that it was Muscovy, Novgorod and other principalities of Rus'. It is Kiev which is the heart of Rus', not Moscow, although Russian imperialists spread this propaganda all the time.
I don't say, that there were no German influence in Poland, on the contrary, Polish culture were under huge German influence, but also under French, Italian, Dutch, Ukrainian, Lithuanian, Hungarian, Swedish, Jewish, Armenian, Russian, Czech, Turkish, Persian, etc. Poland is one of the most "multi- cultural" countries in this part of the world, only Italy, Turkey, maybe Spain, France could be called more "multi-cultural". I am proud to live in such multi-cultural place, I am proud for being partly German, partly Ukrainian, partly Hungarian, I don't even know how many influence is in my blood. Germany is more Slavic than Germanic, especially East Germany, that's for sure, genetics tells this very precisely. Germans are mix of Celtic, Slavic and partly Germanic influence, the same as French are being a mix of Celtic, Germanic, Italic, etc. Every, big country, lying in places where there was huge mixing of cultures and peoples is "multi-cultural". That's why I say, Europe does not need any need, artificial "multi-culturalism", because is has always been multicultural, much more than Northern Africa or Middle East. And that's why I don't and I won't ever call Poland "western" country, because there are huge influences from Western Asia and Middle East, too.
What kind of "European" quality do you promote? Is it genetic, is it racist? I thought EU is just an economic community for corporations something like a crowded aquarium for few sharks. Why do you believe EEC was so much struggling when the non-European Algeria and Greenland wished to withdraw from the Community? No, the EU corporations would accept every country that can be economically controlled. THAT is the reason why Russia is not member but Greece although Greek people voted against EEC in 1981.
Plato was very clear about Athenian Democracy, it sucks. I also consider, Democracy as a complete absurd, which is based on false pseudo-Ideas, like Equality. We, Humans are not equal, we differ from one another and only 2 features, makes us Humans – Morality and Culture. Sadly, in modern times, where cultural Marxism, destroys the last remnants of Morality and last remnants of Culture, we can say openly – majority of people, living in the West, should be put in the ZOO.
Nationalism is based on Corporatism, because every Nation is different and people, within the National Body/Organism, differ from one another. Good politician must be a Corporatist Patriot, he or she must think about everyone. Society, State, Economy are part of the same Political Organism and political elite is the brain of one organism. Corporatist Society is based on the notion of mutual respect and mutual reciprocity. Definitely not on Equality, I hate Equality, since it does not exist in Nature and people cannot be treated equally. Minorities cannot be given the same power as majority, just like individuals cannot be given the same power and influence. If a person is wise, industrious, patriotic, must be given bigger influence on the state as the traitorous-acting lazybones and parasites. Nationalism, isolationism, xenophobia are only products of evils like imperialism, globalism, multiculturalism, international capitalism, Marxism. Destroy the latter, former will be gone. I say it once and for all, nationalism has nothing to do with xenophobia. It is imperialism, socialism, internationalism, capitalism, globalism which produce xenophobia and hate. Every war stars from national hubris which has nothing to do with pride. Racial pride has nothing to do with racism. Racism is widespread in Africa, Asia, but none sees it. I do not want to say, why, because it will obviously be considered as racism. We live in the times of fully legalized racism, anti-white, especially anti-Eastern European racism. Hypocrisy has the power.
I like German slogan "Deutschland über Alles", although I this is exactly what every country in Europe and the world needs, civilized nationalism, free of chauvinism and imperialism. So called "Prussian spirit", mixture of Polish and East German elements was a great thing. Problem is, that it should not be combined with German nationalism, it makes Germans, evil people.
Our Polish tradition is based on Sarmatism – we are Western country with strong Eastern spirit. That's why, Western Europe is not the best option for us. That's why I support idea of Pol-Exit. We prefer Intermarium, not EUSSR. Sarmatism was an essence of "Western-sceptic, pro-Eastern" kind of thinkings. Poland is a place where West meets East, that's the fact, everyone who says something opposite is an anti-Polish traitor and foreign agent.
Insults say more about the sender than about the addressee. You are very industrious to offend others. Perhaps that is the reason why one would like to kick your ass, the reason for the antipathy to Poland that you feel. This comment is clear evidence for everything I wrote here and I write all the time. Only a HYPOCRITE, CRITICIZES NATIONALISM. Only hypocrite! Since, it is the most logical, rational, natural system, one can imagine. If we speak about "antipathy" I do not know, what are you talking about. I blame Polish people for 3 things: Libertarianism and arrogant egocentrism, for cosmic level of naivety towards the outside world and for insanely irrational altruism. Sounds weird, but this is the society, we must live. Only Russia and Ukraine are more primitive in this case, although I consider them, as less degenerated, these days. People, just like Nations, do not have friends or foes, only chances and opportunities. Of course, there are people who are closer to us and who are more distant, just like countries and other groups. But human being, from its own birth to its own death is on his/her own. That's why, to survive and to success one must embrace Corporatism, unless lives on inhabited island. Communitarian Egoism to be precise. Ant-thesis for Libertarian, egocentrist arrogance. 2 worst things on this world are arrogance and hypocrisy, effect of people's egocentrism. It is egocentrism which is negative. Combination of egoism, arrogance and hypocrisy.
You commits the same mistake as many other persons here. You say Nationalism, instead of Imperialism. Concert of Powers was a product of Imperialism and Imperialism is anti-Nationalism. Thanks to Nationalism, half of Europe is now free. Poland, Baltic States, Finland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Yuguslavia, Ireland, these countries have been born in early 20th Century, thanks to collapse of Imperialism, by Nationalism. Nationalism bases itself on 2 most importal values – Freedom/Liberty and Dignity. There is no freedom without the dignity. Europe cannot fight with Freedom nor with Dignity, it will be exactly like the Marxist-Communist and Nietscheanist-Nazi totalitarian system of 20th Century. So, Europe must embrace Nationalism, which is nothing more than a stronger, more active form of Patriotism. It is natural than Chauvenism, Jingosim, Imperialism were responsible, next to Marxism and Capitalism, for the 1914-1918, 1939-1945 and even earlier conflicts and wars. People in Europe must analyze the history firsts, free of Marxist-Liberal, but also National Joingoist propaganda. I try to evaluate the history in such way, therefore I am able to foresee the political evens, like the conflict in Ukraine, which started 3 years ago.
But clearly, judging by your simplistic evaluations, you don't even know what you're wishing for. I want Nationalism and Corporatism to take power in as many places, in the world, as it is possible. Not because I want to "start a new War" or introduce genocide, but because I want to prevent it. It is Liberalism, Socialism, Capitalism, Marxism Globalism, Imperialism which stand in opposition to Nationalism and these systems, ideologic ones are the truly criminal. Not Nationalism, which is a form of self-defense. Against all these evils. And Hungary is one of the very few countries which tries to defend itself, against all these forces. Poland is already lost, because it embraced Liberalism, Capitalism, Liberal Democracy. Marxism is slowly gaining ground even here, in country which lost at least 3 million people, from the hands of Marxists. This what makes me sick. Longer I live in this country, more radical I am becoming. In the past, I was sure, that my standpoint is maybe "too radical", but when I watch all these events, in my country, in Europe, in the world, I know, I am the most rational person, possible.
If there were no Imperialism in Europe, if Nationalism in Europe were as strong as it were in the second part of 19th Century, there would be no Great War. If there had no been Great War, there would have been no Marxism, USSR as well. Hence, there would have been no Hitler, no Mussollini and so on. There would have been all these tragedies today. Conclusion is very simple – Nationalism could have save Europe from death. Nationalists have failed together with all European Nations.
I'd say you fit perfectly the criteria of a German nationalist yourself, if not of a WW2 German apologist at worst!
I repeat it all the time, Modern Nationalism, no matter of what nationality it represents, has the same, single enemy – Globalism. Everyone, German Nationalists, Polish Nationalists, US Nationalists, Iranian Nationalists, Chinese Nationalists and so on. Nationalism is anti-thesis for Globalism and modern Globalism has two faces – Liberal Democratic Marxism and Capitalist Globalism. Both Marxists/Socialists/Communists and Liberal-Conservative Capitalists represent the same coin – Globalism. Leftists who shout about "evil Globalization" spread lies, because they are the part of this movement. Ask them about immigration. Only Nationalism opposes both, immigration and emigration. We do not like neither of both. Nationalism, simply, fights for Freedom and Dignity for every Nation, Tribe, Ethnic Group in this world. It is not my fault, that people still believe in Liberal/Marxist propaganda, related to Nationalism. You are free to believe in everything, even in your gibberish.
I blame Germans for their atrocities, definitely not Mussolini or any other Far Right leader at the time. Even Hitler's role in atrocities should be reconsidered. But I am against any weird thesis that Hitler was a good guy or even a "lesser evil ", or that he was placed by the Rotschilds . Even to comparison to Stalin or Mao Tse Tung, with whom Adolf was closely related, mentally, a crank.
What you don’t understand is that Liberalism binded with Nationalism, creates Imperialism. Imperialism is a National Egoism, antithesis for Nationalism which is based on Corporatism, where every Nation, just like every individual, has its own place on Earth and lives according to Corporatist, based on relations, between the elements, way. So, you speak about similar thing, but I do not consider individual humans as top priority. Community, like Family, Nation/Tribe, Race are more important than single individuals and these individuals must accept such a rule. This is what I am talking about.
All of people have their own views and have part of one ideology. I personally tried to find the most "unbiased" ideology and I found, that Corporatism and Nationalism is, paradoxically the least ideological of all. At least, people who believe in Corporatism/Nationalism are flexible and do not have ideological or moral doubts. Corporatism and Nationalism are very easy to understood – interest of Society and Nations always, I repeat, always, comes above the interest of one individual. I accept that, as an individual, I support egoism, but I despise ego-centrism. Sadly, people have basic problem from differentiation between these two standpoints. Everyone should act like an egoist and to fight ego-centrism in the same moment. That's why I support Nationalism but fight Chauvinism and Imperialism. Nationalism stands against Jingoism and Imperialism, just like Egoism stands against Ego-centrism. Everyone must understand this very basic truth. Anti-thesis for Egoism and Nationalism is Altruism and Internationalism, which are completely irrational. Altruism is popular among apes. Yet, I consider humans standing above apes.