Don’t get me wrong, I do NOT oppose the Palestinian cause, and I very much believe both white and East Asian countries should withdraw aid to Israel for the sole fact that Jews don’t deserve to be rewarded for subversion.
This said, with the unfortunate mainstreaming of antisemitism that’s happened as of late, that’s to the point you’ll see such scum as:
• multiracialism supporters
• racemixing supporters
• LGBT mutant advocates
• foidists
calling people “good goys” for opposing ideas that QUITE LITERALLY are and always have been pushed by kikes, you need to take a step back and reconsider who may be lurking among your supposed allies.
Of course, the aforementioned examples are people you’re unlikely to come across in your spaces, but the issue is that some more cunning ones can and do infiltrate incelosphere or Dissident Right spaces and push certain narratives that are less “out there.”
For example, the people who call literally every crime committed by a divERse perpetrator an “Israeli false flag,” or call support for violence against women/queers “Jewish divide and conquer tactics,” or claim that racial isolationism/ethnostatism is a “Jewish psyop” that incel men shouldn’t care for (despite multiracialism/globalism being arguably one of the biggest factors behind the inceldom epidemic).
Considering it was the pro-Palestine movement that began this mainstreaming of anti-semitism, in light of these recent events, I suggest that the new litmus test for “basedness” be whether or not someone is capable of opposing Israel/Jews without whining about Palestine. This isn’t to suggest that I have anything against the Palestinians themselves, but rather the types of “people” who are disproportionately represented within the pro-Palestine movement.
All in all, if you see a self-proclaimed antisemite who can’t stfu about Palestine, Occam’s razor suggests they’re NOT based
This said, with the unfortunate mainstreaming of antisemitism that’s happened as of late, that’s to the point you’ll see such scum as:
• multiracialism supporters
• racemixing supporters
• LGBT mutant advocates
• foidists
calling people “good goys” for opposing ideas that QUITE LITERALLY are and always have been pushed by kikes, you need to take a step back and reconsider who may be lurking among your supposed allies.
Of course, the aforementioned examples are people you’re unlikely to come across in your spaces, but the issue is that some more cunning ones can and do infiltrate incelosphere or Dissident Right spaces and push certain narratives that are less “out there.”
For example, the people who call literally every crime committed by a divERse perpetrator an “Israeli false flag,” or call support for violence against women/queers “Jewish divide and conquer tactics,” or claim that racial isolationism/ethnostatism is a “Jewish psyop” that incel men shouldn’t care for (despite multiracialism/globalism being arguably one of the biggest factors behind the inceldom epidemic).
Considering it was the pro-Palestine movement that began this mainstreaming of anti-semitism, in light of these recent events, I suggest that the new litmus test for “basedness” be whether or not someone is capable of opposing Israel/Jews without whining about Palestine. This isn’t to suggest that I have anything against the Palestinians themselves, but rather the types of “people” who are disproportionately represented within the pro-Palestine movement.
All in all, if you see a self-proclaimed antisemite who can’t stfu about Palestine, Occam’s razor suggests they’re NOT based
Last edited:
