RageFuel Can Society Please Stop Attributing Positive Qualities to Women that they Neither Posses nor Deserve?

[Deleted member 14382]

For example, for years we've been enduring the mantra that 'men are sexually simple, while women are sexually complex'. This suggests that we're somehow inferior, like primitive apes, and that females possess some kind of mysterious, fine-tuned and nuanced sexual machinery.

Just LOL at this brazen feminist lie. The truth is actually the other way around.

Women are the ones whose sexuality is comically simple. Foids are programmed to be aroused by one thing and one thing only: a man with a generic, chiseled face that can pass for a model. That's it. Nothing else is capable of sexually arousing a foid, even if you coat it in 24K liquid gold and sprinkle it with diamonds.

MEN's sexuality, on the other hand, is VERY complex. We are capable of being sexually aroused by an infinitude of female looks. We like lean women, fat ones, lanky women and petite women. We're attracted to curvaceous looks, or flat ones; women with classically beautiful faces, and downright ugly ones, and everything in between. In addition, we have a multitude of sexual fetishes ranging from the odd to the disgusting.

In short, we respond to a shockingly vast range of sexual--and even nonsexual--stimuli. Our sexuality is vastly more nuanced and complex than females'. It's not even close. How the fuck can society deem our sexuality 'simple'??

P.S.: Oh, and one more thing. Women act "mysterious" around average/ugly men because they simply don't find them attractive. Nothing "mysterious" about it. Put Chad in front of them, and watch them act like drooling children.

 

[LastGerman]

We do also have a penis.

 

[Deleted member 14382]

We do also have a penis.

Our penis is every bit as sexually complex as a woman's vagina. We feel different sensations in the head, shaft and underbelly of our penises.

 

[TomathonClancy]

Women are as easy to read as a book. Attracting them is hard if you’re not attractive, true, but let’s not think for a second that you can’t tell when a girl is or is not interested in you.

 

[Deleted member 14382]

Women are as easy to read as a book. Attracting them is hard if you’re not attractive, true, but let’s not think for a second that you can’t tell when a girl is or is not interested in you.

Foids are as simple as an "on" and "off" switch-- if you're attractive, they turn on; if you're ugly, they turn off. End of story.
With men, it's vastly more complicated than that. We find so many things attractive (and revolting) about a woman that you can never predict how we will react. With a foid, you can ALWAYS tell how she'll react based on how classically good-looking a guy is.

 

[Napoleon de Jizzbal]

This needs to be written to constitution of USA

 

[RopeMaXXer]

It's necessary to start treating all behaviour attributed to men by women as projection.
The amount of times mainstream has been wrong and exactly opposite of reality is comical

 

[Deleted member 14382]

It's necessary to start treating all behaviour attributed to men by women as projection.
The amount of times mainstream has been wrong and exactly opposite of reality is comical

Wholeheartedly agree. Women are masters of projection, and society often gets the truth wrong by 180 degrees. Their level of ignorance and stupidity is shocking.

 

[MuslimCell]

Thanks , for that . We men are awesome and better in every way . We are the PRIZE not them .

 

[Rassimov]

As a reaction to hypergamy being more and more evident , a bluepilled theory is being spread on reddit and quora that goes on amazing lengths of mental gymnastics in a attempt to negate the very lookist nature of women. Insane female standards are being portrayed as demisexuality; or the notion that women do not fall for looks on first sight like shallow men do, but rather have to connect emotionally first in order to find a man romantically appealing. But what this in turn points to is only the hard boiled fact that roughly 80% of men really are completely invisible to women.

 

[Deleted member 14382]

demisexuality; or the notion that women do not fall for looks on first sight like shallow men do, but rather have to connect emotionally first in order to find a man romantically appealing.

Just LMFAO! Projection at its finest.

I've been carefully observing foids for years, and I've come to a conclusion about them. They either have a shocking lack of self awareness, or they're deliberately being deceptive when they make their claims. Neither possibility is good.

The fact is that women will REFLEXIVELY react the moment Chad shows up. It's an involuntary reaction that is triggered by the way he looks. It's 100% VISUAL. They have no control over this reaction. So, for them to claim that men are the ones who are obsessed with looks is hypocrisy on another level. Not only are women obsessed with looks, it's actually the ONLY thing they care about. They won't even make brief eye contact with you if you're ugly. That's how bad it is. If you think I'm exaggerating, prove it to yourself. Go out in public and tell me if a single woman gives you an IOI, or if she even makes eye contact with you. Go ahead. I dare you.

 

[needsolution]

We do also have a penis.

 

[Adamhastor]

We are the PRIZE not them

Based red pill bro

 

[Deleted member 4159]

 

[Deleted member 15737]

It's pure truth, not much else can be added.

 

[Deleted member 18435]

Women are as easy to read as a book. Attracting them is hard if you’re not attractive, true, but let’s not think for a second that you can’t tell when a girl is or is not interested in you.

It's necessary to start treating all behaviour attributed to men by women as projection.
The amount of times mainstream has been wrong and exactly opposite of reality is comical

 

[Deleted member 4159]

The worst are the people that say women are "social creatures" and "master manipulators". It's easy to be social when everyone kisses your ass. And it's easy to be a manipulator when everyone caves to your will. If they were actually held responsible for their actions, there's NO WAY a woman would openly step out of line. They are natural cowards, and value their own survival above all else.

 

[Salustio]

men are sexually simple, while women are sexually complex

This is false, proven by science to be false. Women are sexually simple and men are sexually complex, as you can see the truth is the opposite of what society claims.

 

[starystulejarz]

Thanks , for that . We men are awesome and better in every way . We are the PRIZE not them .

high iq

 

[Deleted member 14382]

The worst are the people that say women are "social creatures" and "master manipulators". It's easy to be social when everyone kisses your ass. And it's easy to be a manipulator when everyone caves to your will. If they were actually held responsible for their actions, there's NO WAY a woman would openly step out of line. They are natural cowards, and value their own survival above all else.

Exactly right. That's a major reason why there are so many men with "social anxiety", but relatively few women. When everyone treats you well, there's little reason to be socially anxious, and when they treat you like shit, there's every reason.