Linky Love
The Hero of Incels
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2019
- Posts
- 11,446
Not even if I bought you a new Nintendo Switch OLED screen version?I am not. Nor ever will be.
Do you moderate Inceltear as well?
Not even if I bought you a new Nintendo Switch OLED screen version?I am not. Nor ever will be.
Do you moderate Inceltear as well?
I'll forgive you if you unban gripmaxxing since you're giving 2nd chances and unbanning autistic people, gripmaxxing also has autismThe logic is as follows:
Bretty is a user who deals with what I understand is severe autism. He achieved a one-time fetishistic experience with a 39 year old woman with cerebral palsy, who asked him to walk ahead on the streets so as to not be seen with him, who later blocked him, and with whom bretty did not have what most people would call sex, but a footjob, rub, or something along those lines.
Moreover, this was all shared in a non-public discord server and the messages were leaked, this was not posted on the forum. We can consider this as information that was brought to our attention, but not as a case of bragging.
Consider that many neurotypical users gladly post on the forum about their escort experiences (which we do not warn since the community voted that they are allowed, remember that), but then if a severely autistic user says (not on the forum) that an almost 40 year old woman with cerebral palsy wanted a purely sexual one-time fetish experience with him - clearly not a romantic one from what I understand - then he is considered a fakecel that needs to be banned.
Point is, to ban a mentally ill user who spends so much time in incel forums, who achieved such a niche and short-lived experience, with such an unusual character who most users here would not touch ever in their lives, would be a disservice to the community. Should we then also ban the users who would reject this woman? Worst than Bretty, they would not really be involuntary celibates for denying her, no? - Devil's advocate of course, but meant to show perspective.
No doubt there will be controversy. I appreciate (thought out) counterarguments if anyone has any.
I'll forgive you if you unban gripmaxxing since you're giving 2nd chances and unbanning autistic people, gripmaxxing also has autism
Serge: "Take the white pill bro, go live in the fucking forest by yourself bro "
Sorry about that.received a warning (10%) without any clarification/elucidation in regards
good luck with turning this forum a ,,better place" by letting fakecels get away unpunished while creating a collateral cascade effect leading users to leave by the huge disappointment that are the rules being blatantly unapplied to fakecels mascots, just change the name of forum to ,,larpers.is" instead
Watch as you see an influx of new users claiming to be autisticI don't care much about Bratty Boy but the double standards is what makes this thing very sus.
I should've waited creating an account.Watch as you see an influx of new users claiming to be autistic
Sorry about that.
You were warned for a low effort spam (single emoticon) post on ID.
Had you made the same post on lounge or sewers no warning would’ve been issued.
My autism is high functioning but I‘m ‘strange’ by society standards and I’m not so 100% but my brain age is POSSIBLY not the same as my real age, etc, and as for the other thing, I won’t discuss this here.The logic is as follows:
Bretty is a user who deals with what I understand is severe autism. He achieved a one-time fetishistic experience with a 39 year old woman with cerebral palsy, who asked him to walk ahead on the streets so as to not be seen with him, who later blocked him, and with whom bretty did not have what most people would call sex, but a footjob, rub, or something along those lines.
Moreover, this was all shared in a non-public discord server and the messages were leaked, this was not posted on the forum. We can consider this as information that was brought to our attention, but not as a case of bragging.
Consider that many neurotypical users gladly post on the forum about their escort experiences (which we do not warn since the community voted that they are allowed, remember that), but then if a severely autistic user says (not on the forum) that an almost 40 year old woman with cerebral palsy wanted a purely sexual one-time fetish experience with him - clearly not a romantic one from what I understand - then he is considered a fakecel that needs to be banned.
Point is, to ban a mentally ill user who spends so much time in incel forums, who achieved such a niche and short-lived experience, with such an unusual character who most users here would not touch ever in their lives, would be a disservice to the community. Should we then also ban the users who would reject this woman? Worse than Bretty, they would not really be involuntary celibates since they deny her, no? - Devil's advocate of course, meant to show perspective.
No doubt there will be controversy. I appreciate (thought out) counterarguments if anyone has any.
I'm considering now that a warning, though not permaban, could very well be justified, but I'd like to hear opinions.
JflMy autism is high functioning but I‘m strange by society standards and I’m not so 100% but my brain age is possibly not the same as my real age and as for the other thing, I won’t discus this here.
I do sometimes struggle on how to word shit when speaking in real life though because you know, in real life, once you say something, it’s said but online you can think on how to word something and also edit your words but I do communicate well still.My autism is high functioning but I‘m ‘strange’ by society standards and I’m not so 100% but my brain age is POSSIBLY not the same as my real age, etc, and as for the other thing, I won’t discuss this here.
FACTSThe logic is as follows:
Bretty is a user who deals with what I understand is severe autism. He achieved a one-time fetishistic experience with a 39 year old woman with cerebral palsy, who asked him to walk ahead on the streets so as to not be seen with him, who later blocked him, and with whom bretty did not have what most people would call sex, but a footjob, rub, or something along those lines.
Moreover, this was all shared in a non-public discord server and the messages were leaked, this was not posted on the forum. We can consider this as information that was brought to our attention, but not as a case of bragging.
Consider that many neurotypical users gladly post on the forum about their escort experiences (which we do not warn since the community voted that they are allowed, remember that), but then if a severely autistic user says (not on the forum) that an almost 40 year old woman with cerebral palsy wanted a purely sexual one-time fetish experience with him - clearly not a romantic one from what I understand - then he is considered a fakecel that needs to be banned.
Point is, to ban a mentally ill user who spends so much time in incel forums, who achieved such a niche and short-lived experience, with such an unusual character who most users here would not touch ever in their lives, would be a disservice to the community. Should we then also ban the users who would reject this woman? Worse than Bretty, they would not really be involuntary celibates since they deny her, no? - Devil's advocate of course, meant to show perspective.
No doubt there will be controversy. I appreciate (thought out) counterarguments if anyone has any.
I'm considering now that a warning, though not permaban, could very well be justified, but I'd like to hear opinions.
people here have too much of a low iq black and white perspective and ignore any context to care, ironic considering how much they bash normies for having a herd mentalityThe logic is as follows:
Bretty is a user who deals with what I understand is severe autism. He achieved a one-time fetishistic experience with a 39 year old woman with cerebral palsy, who asked him to walk ahead on the streets so as to not be seen with him, who later blocked him, and with whom bretty did not have what most people would call sex, but a footjob, rub, or something along those lines.
Moreover, this was all shared in a non-public discord server and the messages were leaked, this was not posted on the forum. We can consider this as information that was brought to our attention, but not as a case of bragging.
Consider that many neurotypical users gladly post on the forum about their escort experiences (which we do not warn since the community voted that they are allowed, remember that), but then if a severely autistic user says (not on the forum) that an almost 40 year old woman with cerebral palsy wanted a purely sexual one-time fetish experience with him - clearly not a romantic one from what I understand - then he is considered a fakecel that needs to be banned.
Point is, to ban a mentally ill user who spends so much time in incel forums, who achieved such a niche and short-lived experience, with such an unusual character who most users here would not touch ever in their lives, would be a disservice to the community. Should we then also ban the users who would reject this woman? Worse than Bretty, they would not really be involuntary celibates since they deny her, no? - Devil's advocate of course, meant to show perspective.
No doubt there will be controversy. I appreciate (thought out) counterarguments if anyone has any.
I'm considering now that a warning, though not permaban, could very well be justified, but I'd like to hear opinions.
At least the dude isn‘t ableist and is being professional as he should be doing as an admin, even if he got my level of autism wrong since my autism is high functioning but he’s at least trying to understand, unlike the staff members of this Discord server I was in who refer to autistic men as ’retards’ in a way to feel above them, etc.FACTS
tbhAt least the dude isn‘t ableist and is being professional as he should be doing as an admin, even if he got my level of autism wrong since my autism is high functioning but he’s at least trying to understand, unlike the staff members of this Discord server I was in who refer to autistic men as ’retards’ in a way to feel above them, etc.
The staff of that server I’m speaking of even say that autistic men should be killed and that they are worthless, etc. Not professional at all.tbh
I think every ableist user should be investigated
ableism is a big problemThe staff of that server I’m speaking of even say that autistic men should be killed and that they are worthless, etc. Not professional at all.
Yeah, bro, for real. Not wrong at all about that.ableism is a big problem
It's good that Sergeant could see your point of view
Based. Absolute justice. NO FAKECELS.Your entire argument was a "false dichotomy" (google it if you are unsure of what I'm talking about)
The forum doesn't have to allow fakecels OR ELSE become like reddit
All the other stuff you somehow decided to place in the same bracket as boasting about having a normie sex life can very easily be allowed, whilst banning fakecels that boast about having a normie sex life
Also like I've said before in a thread made by Sarge himself (because I know what you are going to argue next - its predictable)
If I had to choose between never being allowed to talk about prostitution again and having all fakecels banned, or being able to talk about it but fakecels being allowed because "I'm talking about sex too", I would choose to have all talks of escortcelling and prostitution banned
So don't even bother coming with that argument lol
I am fully for banning all talks of sex period involving any incel regardless of payment or not if it means getting rid of ALL fakecels, no exceptions, no leniency because they fake having a mental illness or any other trollish bullshit like that
This part especially was cringe, this post literally exudes the fake laughing of a politician trying to do PR (public relations) and calm people down
"Remember those good times, so incel and relatable am I right guiz? "
No, fuck off
Also, maybe I'm remembering incorrectly, but @Colvin76 WAS BANNED FOR BEING A FAKECEL (so you couldn't have used a worse example)
"If we banned fakecels then you couldn't have made all these memories under false pretenses with fakecels "
We know, that's a good thing, you are literally reminiscing about trolls indirectly mocking us and sadistically having fun "playing around" with us losers, we don't want them around to "make memories"
Serge plsI just gave him the power to post an appeal, other mod had understandably taken it away.
Quite clearly the only reason why our old boy isn't banned is because serge knows that this shithole website that should have shut down in 2018 would die if it wasn't for the retards who keep activity upThe sexual favors you guys keep prattling on about here in regards to the Bretty boy situation aren’t the issue from Serge’s perspective.
The issue is Serge attempting to make this a better, nicer and arguably more just forum to be a part of than Reddit by not being so viciously black and white about banning everyone by the exact letter of the law ie the forum rule set but again looking at things on a case by case basis.
Bretty boy has only been shown mercy…and it’s a mercy I might add that Serge would grant to any one of you under similar circumstances because Bretty boy is so obviously and severely mentally ill with the tism and probably god knows what else is going on inside the boy’s head?
And I understand that some of you think he’s faking it and it’s just a LARP and it invites others to act in the same way if they want to generate a “get out of jail” ie banning free card for themselves should they make admissions of having had voluntary sexy times with a live human female of dubious attractiveness on our site.
Look, I get your concerns but this is how Serge wants it done and he is likely confident he and we his staff can see through a LARP or not.
Now a question for you guys…
Would you rather Serge run this forum exactly like Reddit ie as a veritable leftist version of Cobra Kai, where we give absolutely no nuance or leeway or leniency, as it pertains to everyone, whether mentally ill tard or not following the rules to the exact letter of the law and striking first, striking hard and having no mercy as we ban you and or your friends for minor or medium or major violations?
If we were to do things that way, you all wouldn’t get to see all of the beautiful, wonderful, entertaining, delicious racial battles/fights and arguments between my boy bummer drummer and the big homie Thoughtfulcel.
Nor would you have the sewers board that you post maxxing spammers enjoy or all the brutally hilarious NSFW Colvin posts you guys used to make of random knee grows from shock sites being tortured and set on fire that topic starters would say was Colvin and then explained that to be the reason why he was away from the forum ie that he’d been captured and was being tortured hahahahaha.
No, I really don’t think you guys want the overly strict moderation that you claim, otherwise you’d of left the site for good, for greener pastures the very minute ol Bretty boy was unbanned by yours truly.
Now sure I could be wrong about that but I pretty much am never wrong about anything.
The old picture of him was HTN-chadlite tier (which explains the outercourse story with a becky+), but the loss of most of his teeth will likely ruin bone structure over time. What a retard.
even then, he still foot-fucked a sub 2 foid
Quite clearly the only reason why our old boy isn't banned is because serge knows that this shithole website that should have shut down in 2018 would die if it wasn't for the retards who keep activity up
Do you moderate Inceltear as well?
Quite clearly the only reason why our old boy isn't banned is because serge knows that this shithole website that should have shut down in 2018 would die if it wasn't for the retards who keep activity up
na mod, foids owe me her pussy because i have contributed to the well being of the society."No one is owed anything”.
alright he says it is a one off, but for whatever discussion about his sexual experience he did outside this forum, should he not get a temporary ban, he is unbanned immediately, he knew he fucked up, as we can see him ,as a deleted user on the pictorial evidence,Another question for you guys is what if Bretty is so incredibly mentally ill we eventually find out that he imagined it all?
Of course in regards to the foot rub and tug and whatever other supposed sexual acts allegedly took place in his life.
How can we believe such a mentally ill loony tune about anything that they say really?
I recall him saying his autism is not severe.Autism is not a "Get out of jail for free" card, 1 in 4 users here have autism. In Bretty's case it is more severe than average, so it was a consideration
Mine and his autism are high functioning since we were both able to make accounts on this site and we both communicated with you, well, if that dude is autistic anyway.
I’m personally ‘strange’ by society standards but that doesn’t mean my autism is severe.
I show up as ‘Deleted User’ because that is my old Discord account that got disabled.na mod, foids owe me her pussy because i have contributed to the well being of the society.
alright he says it is a one off, but for whatever discussion about his sexual experience he did outside this forum, should he not get a temporary ban, he is unbanned immediately, he knew he fucked up, as we can see him ,as a deleted user on the pictorial evidence,
and also he says he was not expecting to be unbanned so he is aware of things.
of course living with autism sucks but also he is a high functioning autist which means he can perform daily task , An HFA may find it difficult to maintain relationships and conversation.
anyway the ultimate decision makers are the moderators .
I recall him saying his autism is not severe.
alright , glad to know.I show up as ‘Deleted User’ because that is my old Discord account that got disabled.
I show up as ‘Deleted User’ because that is my old Discord account that got disabled.
Brett claims to be a fully functioning adult with high functioning autism and spergs out and smashes his head on the floor if you claim he's low functioning. Grotesque also has it hard regarding his autism and he didn't get a second chanceAutism is not a "Get out of jail for free" card, 1 in 4 users here have autism. In Bretty's case it is more severe than average, so it was a consideration on top of the other arguments I made.