Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Can Jannies & Admincels please clarify the rules on sexual experiences?

Can we unban gripmaxxing :feelsseriously:
 
The logic is as follows:
Bretty is a user who deals with what I understand is severe autism. He achieved a one-time fetishistic experience with a 39 year old woman with cerebral palsy, who asked him to walk ahead on the streets so as to not be seen with him, who later blocked him, and with whom bretty did not have what most people would call sex, but a footjob, rub, or something along those lines.

Moreover, this was all shared in a non-public discord server and the messages were leaked, this was not posted on the forum. We can consider this as information that was brought to our attention, but not as a case of bragging.

Consider that many neurotypical users gladly post on the forum about their escort experiences (which we do not warn since the community voted that they are allowed, remember that), but then if a severely autistic user says (not on the forum) that an almost 40 year old woman with cerebral palsy wanted a purely sexual one-time fetish experience with him - clearly not a romantic one from what I understand - then he is considered a fakecel that needs to be banned.

Point is, to ban a mentally ill user who spends so much time in incel forums, who achieved such a niche and short-lived experience, with such an unusual character who most users here would not touch ever in their lives, would be a disservice to the community. Should we then also ban the users who would reject this woman? Worst than Bretty, they would not really be involuntary celibates for denying her, no? - Devil's advocate of course, but meant to show perspective.

No doubt there will be controversy. I appreciate (thought out) counterarguments if anyone has any.
I'll forgive you if you unban gripmaxxing since you're giving 2nd chances and unbanning autistic people, gripmaxxing also has autism
 
received a warning (10%) without any clarification/elucidation in regards

good luck with turning this forum a ,,better place" by letting fakecels get away unpunished while creating a collateral cascade effect leading users to leave by the huge disappointment that are the rules being blatantly unapplied to fakecels mascots, just change the name of forum to ,,larpers.is" instead
 
I don't care much about Bratty Boy but the double standards is what makes this thing very sus.
 
received a warning (10%) without any clarification/elucidation in regards

good luck with turning this forum a ,,better place" by letting fakecels get away unpunished while creating a collateral cascade effect leading users to leave by the huge disappointment that are the rules being blatantly unapplied to fakecels mascots, just change the name of forum to ,,larpers.is" instead
Sorry about that.

You were warned for a low effort spam (single emoticon) post on ID.

Had you made the same post on lounge or sewers no warning would’ve been issued.:feelsclown:
 
Sorry about that.

You were warned for a low effort spam (single emoticon) post on ID.

Had you made the same post on lounge or sewers no warning would’ve been issued.:feelsclown:
:feelsjuice:
 
The logic is as follows:
Bretty is a user who deals with what I understand is severe autism. He achieved a one-time fetishistic experience with a 39 year old woman with cerebral palsy, who asked him to walk ahead on the streets so as to not be seen with him, who later blocked him, and with whom bretty did not have what most people would call sex, but a footjob, rub, or something along those lines.

Moreover, this was all shared in a non-public discord server and the messages were leaked, this was not posted on the forum. We can consider this as information that was brought to our attention, but not as a case of bragging.

Consider that many neurotypical users gladly post on the forum about their escort experiences (which we do not warn since the community voted that they are allowed, remember that), but then if a severely autistic user says (not on the forum) that an almost 40 year old woman with cerebral palsy wanted a purely sexual one-time fetish experience with him - clearly not a romantic one from what I understand - then he is considered a fakecel that needs to be banned.

Point is, to ban a mentally ill user who spends so much time in incel forums, who achieved such a niche and short-lived experience, with such an unusual character who most users here would not touch ever in their lives, would be a disservice to the community. Should we then also ban the users who would reject this woman? Worse than Bretty, they would not really be involuntary celibates since they deny her, no? - Devil's advocate of course, meant to show perspective.

No doubt there will be controversy. I appreciate (thought out) counterarguments if anyone has any.
I'm considering now that a warning, though not permaban, could very well be justified, but I'd like to hear opinions.
My autism is high functioning but I‘m ‘strange’ by society standards and I’m not so 100% but my brain age is POSSIBLY not the same as my real age, etc, and as for the other thing, I won’t discuss this here.
 
Last edited:
My autism is high functioning but I‘m strange by society standards and I’m not so 100% but my brain age is possibly not the same as my real age and as for the other thing, I won’t discus this here.
Jfl
 
My autism is high functioning but I‘m ‘strange’ by society standards and I’m not so 100% but my brain age is POSSIBLY not the same as my real age, etc, and as for the other thing, I won’t discuss this here.
I do sometimes struggle on how to word shit when speaking in real life though because you know, in real life, once you say something, it’s said but online you can think on how to word something and also edit your words but I do communicate well still.
 
The logic is as follows:
Bretty is a user who deals with what I understand is severe autism. He achieved a one-time fetishistic experience with a 39 year old woman with cerebral palsy, who asked him to walk ahead on the streets so as to not be seen with him, who later blocked him, and with whom bretty did not have what most people would call sex, but a footjob, rub, or something along those lines.

Moreover, this was all shared in a non-public discord server and the messages were leaked, this was not posted on the forum. We can consider this as information that was brought to our attention, but not as a case of bragging.

Consider that many neurotypical users gladly post on the forum about their escort experiences (which we do not warn since the community voted that they are allowed, remember that), but then if a severely autistic user says (not on the forum) that an almost 40 year old woman with cerebral palsy wanted a purely sexual one-time fetish experience with him - clearly not a romantic one from what I understand - then he is considered a fakecel that needs to be banned.

Point is, to ban a mentally ill user who spends so much time in incel forums, who achieved such a niche and short-lived experience, with such an unusual character who most users here would not touch ever in their lives, would be a disservice to the community. Should we then also ban the users who would reject this woman? Worse than Bretty, they would not really be involuntary celibates since they deny her, no? - Devil's advocate of course, meant to show perspective.

No doubt there will be controversy. I appreciate (thought out) counterarguments if anyone has any.
I'm considering now that a warning, though not permaban, could very well be justified, but I'd like to hear opinions.
FACTS:blackpill::yes::smonk:
 
The logic is as follows:
Bretty is a user who deals with what I understand is severe autism. He achieved a one-time fetishistic experience with a 39 year old woman with cerebral palsy, who asked him to walk ahead on the streets so as to not be seen with him, who later blocked him, and with whom bretty did not have what most people would call sex, but a footjob, rub, or something along those lines.

Moreover, this was all shared in a non-public discord server and the messages were leaked, this was not posted on the forum. We can consider this as information that was brought to our attention, but not as a case of bragging.

Consider that many neurotypical users gladly post on the forum about their escort experiences (which we do not warn since the community voted that they are allowed, remember that), but then if a severely autistic user says (not on the forum) that an almost 40 year old woman with cerebral palsy wanted a purely sexual one-time fetish experience with him - clearly not a romantic one from what I understand - then he is considered a fakecel that needs to be banned.

Point is, to ban a mentally ill user who spends so much time in incel forums, who achieved such a niche and short-lived experience, with such an unusual character who most users here would not touch ever in their lives, would be a disservice to the community. Should we then also ban the users who would reject this woman? Worse than Bretty, they would not really be involuntary celibates since they deny her, no? - Devil's advocate of course, meant to show perspective.

No doubt there will be controversy. I appreciate (thought out) counterarguments if anyone has any.
I'm considering now that a warning, though not permaban, could very well be justified, but I'd like to hear opinions.
people here have too much of a low iq black and white perspective and ignore any context to care, ironic considering how much they bash normies for having a herd mentality
its like u said, if him having sex with that 39 year old is considered being fakecel then that means that anyone on here that would reject an opportunity like that is also a fakecel
 
At least the dude isn‘t ableist and is being professional as he should be doing as an admin, even if he got my level of autism wrong since my autism is high functioning but he’s at least trying to understand, unlike the staff members of this Discord server I was in who refer to autistic men as ’retards’ in a way to feel above them, etc.
 
At least the dude isn‘t ableist and is being professional as he should be doing as an admin, even if he got my level of autism wrong since my autism is high functioning but he’s at least trying to understand, unlike the staff members of this Discord server I was in who refer to autistic men as ’retards’ in a way to feel above them, etc.
tbh
I think every ableist user should be investigated
 
tbh
I think every ableist user should be investigated
The staff of that server I’m speaking of even say that autistic men should be killed and that they are worthless, etc. Not professional at all.
 
The staff of that server I’m speaking of even say that autistic men should be killed and that they are worthless, etc. Not professional at all.
ableism is a big problem
It's good that Sergeant could see your point of view
 
Your entire argument was a "false dichotomy" (google it if you are unsure of what I'm talking about)

The forum doesn't have to allow fakecels OR ELSE become like reddit

All the other stuff you somehow decided to place in the same bracket as boasting about having a normie sex life can very easily be allowed, whilst banning fakecels that boast about having a normie sex life

Also like I've said before in a thread made by Sarge himself (because I know what you are going to argue next - its predictable)

If I had to choose between never being allowed to talk about prostitution again and having all fakecels banned, or being able to talk about it but fakecels being allowed because "I'm talking about sex too", I would choose to have all talks of escortcelling and prostitution banned

So don't even bother coming with that argument lol

I am fully for banning all talks of sex period involving any incel regardless of payment or not if it means getting rid of ALL fakecels, no exceptions, no leniency because they fake having a mental illness or any other trollish bullshit like that



This part especially was cringe, this post literally exudes the fake laughing of a politician trying to do PR (public relations) and calm people down

"Remember those good times, so incel and relatable am I right guiz? :soy:"
giphy.gif


No, fuck off :feelskek:

Also, maybe I'm remembering incorrectly, but @Colvin76 WAS BANNED FOR BEING A FAKECEL (so you couldn't have used a worse example)

"If we banned fakecels then you couldn't have made all these memories under false pretenses with fakecels :soy:"

We know, that's a good thing, you are literally reminiscing about trolls indirectly mocking us and sadistically having fun "playing around" with us losers, we don't want them around to "make memories"
Based. Absolute justice. NO FAKECELS.
 
The sexual favors you guys keep prattling on about here in regards to the Bretty boy situation aren’t the issue from Serge’s perspective.

The issue is Serge attempting to make this a better, nicer and arguably more just forum to be a part of than Reddit by not being so viciously black and white about banning everyone by the exact letter of the law ie the forum rule set but again looking at things on a case by case basis.

Bretty boy has only been shown mercy…and it’s a mercy I might add that Serge would grant to any one of you under similar circumstances because Bretty boy is so obviously and severely mentally ill with the tism and probably god knows what else is going on inside the boy’s head?

And I understand that some of you think he’s faking it and it’s just a LARP and it invites others to act in the same way if they want to generate a “get out of jail” ie banning free card for themselves should they make admissions of having had voluntary sexy times with a live human female of dubious attractiveness on our site.

Look, I get your concerns but this is how Serge wants it done and he is likely confident he and we his staff can see through a LARP or not.

Now a question for you guys…

Would you rather Serge run this forum exactly like Reddit ie as a veritable leftist version of Cobra Kai, where we give absolutely no nuance or leeway or leniency, as it pertains to everyone, whether mentally ill tard or not following the rules to the exact letter of the law and striking first, striking hard and having no mercy as we ban you and or your friends for minor or medium or major violations?

If we were to do things that way, you all wouldn’t get to see all of the beautiful, wonderful, entertaining, delicious racial battles/fights and arguments between my boy bummer drummer and the big homie Thoughtfulcel.

Nor would you have the sewers board that you post maxxing spammers enjoy or all the brutally hilarious NSFW Colvin posts you guys used to make of random knee grows from shock sites being tortured and set on fire that topic starters would say was Colvin and then explained that to be the reason why he was away from the forum ie that he’d been captured and was being tortured hahahahaha.:feelskek:

No, I really don’t think you guys want the overly strict moderation that you claim, otherwise you’d of left the site for good, for greener pastures the very minute ol Bretty boy was unbanned by yours truly.:feelsclown:

Now sure I could be wrong about that but I pretty much am never wrong about anything.:feelscomfy:
Quite clearly the only reason why our old boy isn't banned is because serge knows that this shithole website that should have shut down in 2018 would die if it wasn't for the retards who keep activity up
 
The old picture of him was HTN-chadlite tier (which explains the outercourse story with a becky+), but the loss of most of his teeth will likely ruin bone structure over time. What a retard.

even then, he still foot-fucked a sub 2 foid

Quite clearly the only reason why our old boy isn't banned is because serge knows that this shithole website that should have shut down in 2018 would die if it wasn't for the retards who keep activity up
:feelsthink::feelsthink::feelsthink::feelsthink:
 
Damn I need a footjob myself

What 7 days of nofap does to ya
 
Do you moderate Inceltear as well? :soy:
:feelskek::feelskek:
No one here will be surprised judging by his and other mods' actions/inactions
Quite clearly the only reason why our old boy isn't banned is because serge knows that this shithole website that should have shut down in 2018 would die if it wasn't for the retards who keep activity up
 
Last edited:
"No one is owed anything”.
na mod, foids owe me her pussy because i have contributed to the well being of the society.
Another question for you guys is what if Bretty is so incredibly mentally ill we eventually find out that he imagined it all?

Of course in regards to the foot rub and tug and whatever other supposed sexual acts allegedly took place in his life.

How can we believe such a mentally ill loony tune about anything that they say really?
alright he says it is a one off, but for whatever discussion about his sexual experience he did outside this forum, should he not get a temporary ban, he is unbanned immediately, he knew he fucked up, as we can see him ,as a deleted user on the pictorial evidence,
and also he says he was not expecting to be unbanned so he is aware of things.
of course living with autism sucks but also he is a high functioning autist which means he can perform daily task , An HFA may find it difficult to maintain relationships and conversation.
anyway the ultimate decision makers are the moderators .
Autism is not a "Get out of jail for free" card, 1 in 4 users here have autism. In Bretty's case it is more severe than average, so it was a consideration
I recall him saying his autism is not severe.
Mine and his autism are high functioning since we were both able to make accounts on this site and we both communicated with you, well, if that dude is autistic anyway.

I’m personally ‘strange’ by society standards but that doesn’t mean my autism is severe.
 
Last edited:
na mod, foids owe me her pussy because i have contributed to the well being of the society.

alright he says it is a one off, but for whatever discussion about his sexual experience he did outside this forum, should he not get a temporary ban, he is unbanned immediately, he knew he fucked up, as we can see him ,as a deleted user on the pictorial evidence,
and also he says he was not expecting to be unbanned so he is aware of things.
of course living with autism sucks but also he is a high functioning autist which means he can perform daily task , An HFA may find it difficult to maintain relationships and conversation.
anyway the ultimate decision makers are the moderators .

I recall him saying his autism is not severe.
I show up as ‘Deleted User’ because that is my old Discord account that got disabled.
 
@SergeantIncel if grotesquesubhuman got permabanned with no opportunity of appeal because he supposedly LARPed his ascent on a completely different forum then I think the same rules should apply to brettygoy tbh,
Autism is not a "Get out of jail for free" card, 1 in 4 users here have autism. In Bretty's case it is more severe than average, so it was a consideration on top of the other arguments I made.
Brett claims to be a fully functioning adult with high functioning autism and spergs out and smashes his head on the floor if you claim he's low functioning. Grotesque also has it hard regarding his autism and he didn't get a second chance
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top