Regenerator
JBWfag Extermination Advocate
★★★★★
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2023
- Posts
- 22,300
JBB works way more in White countries than JBW
JBB works way more in White countries than JBW
Keep making essaysget it through your skull, you are not incel because you AREN'T BROWN. you are reaching for fucking straws looking at anecdotal data of whores trying out pakis and browns (and then going back to looking for white chads) and trying to say THAT is the one thing missing.
nigger being brown would not fix anything, it is MORE unattractive. statistically proven, eurocentric features and whtie skin is more attractive BY FAR. Every ethnic dating out of their race ends up having to negotiate "desire" with money and gifts and good behavior. Maybe the tyrones and chadguptas of blacks and indians are desirable.
- When considering a man of a different race from their own: 95% excluded Indian men, 94% excluded middle eastern men, 92% excluded Asian men, 87% excluded black men, 69% excluded Latino men, and 42% excluded white men.
- Thus we can see that among this group, women employed a racial hierarchy for men in interracial dating of: White > Latino > Black > Asian > Middle Eastern > Indian. White women were the least likely to exclude their own race (4%) and most likely to only want their own race (65%). Asian women were most likely to exclude their own race (40%) and least likely to only want their own race (6%).
- Feliciano C, Robnett B. 2016. Yahoo Personals Dating Preferences Study—Los Angeles, New York, Chicago, Atlanta, 2004-2005. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. [Abstract]
- Robnett B, Feliciano C. 2011. Patterns of Racial-Ethnic Exclusion by Internet Daters. Social Forces, 89(3):807-828. [Abstract]
you are incel because you are unnattractive. bad bone structure. bad face. Not your skin tone, you were born with the CORRECT skin color you low iq retard. Try being reborn as one of us ethnics and see how that fucking goes.
Im the highest iq user on this site, i should become a mod instantly after making my accthis is possibly the most stupid OP I've read so far.
I go outside I usually see ethnic males with women (usually of their own race). Not so many whites.JBB works way more in White countries than JBW
can u stop this cope? lot of slav foid married in EU too, i know slav incels do exist but u cant discard jbw entirely like this
Cool, now look at the actual marriage/sexhaving/cohabitation data that actually mean something in the real world:
The absolute only racial group in the West that struggles because of their race are East Asians, while in the UK at least, Slavs/EEs also join them as the only groups whose women are more likely to marry out than their men. In the US, blacks are much more likely to marry white women that vice versa, while Latinos, Indians and others mostly tie with white guys or slightly lose, but then make up for it since all of them have higher fertility with white women than white men have with their women.
For ethnics, all ethnic man-white woman couples have a higher fertility than JBW ones
Interesting:feelsstudy::feelsjuice:. Racial Pairings and Fertility: Do Interracial Couples Have Fewer Children? These data also indicate substantial variation in fertility across different racial-gender pairings (Table 2, off-diagonal cells). Of these racial pairings, fertility was lowest...incels.is
The preferences studies like the one you just cited are, frankly, completely meaningless unless there's a study that actually matters, with actual marriage/sex/children data backing it up.
Obviously in a majority white country, people are going to prefer the majority, or at least not kick them out of their dating pool, given that the other populations are smaller.
I could equally simply cite this Egyptian study where they asked women their preferred skin color in men, with the majority picking brown, followed by black and white in the last place:
The Impact of Male Physical Attractiveness in Predicting Wives' Marital Satisfaction
Physical qualities assumes a significant part in deciding allure. This examination expects to assess the effect of male physical engaging quality in anticipating spouses' conjugal fulfillment. The current examination was led on 350 female members. The greater part of them were 20-39 years of age...bjas.journals.ekb.eg
Same principle as the study you showed. In a brown country, most people prefer brown, while in a white country, most people prefer white. Both of those are equally meaningless without actual real-world results data supporting them.
Total numbers are meaningless, it's the ratios that matter. You can have however many of your men marrying foreign women, as long as your women are marrying out more, you're losing. It's as simple as that.
Using this exact logic, you might as well say that outmarriage isn't a problem anywhere outside of the West (where, as mentioned, it's a problem only for East Asians), since no place has anywhere as much interracial relationship as it has. 99%+ of marriages in China, for example, are between two Chinese, but since noodles there are about twice as likely to marry foreigners as their male counterparts are, that means that they are losing out to foreigners.
Same thing here. There might not be as many international marriages in Russia as in the US, but since Russian women are overwhelmingly more likely to be the ones doing so, which is the case in other Slavic countries as well, that means that the local men are losing to those foreigners. It's that simple.
Yes? I have gone over that study since I posted it and made sure to write out for each of the studied regions which ethnicities were more likely to have their men marry Russian women (which were most of them), and for which the reverse was true (which was a much smaller amount.)
Yes, most people marry within their group. Not just in Russia, but worldwide. Even in the US, with the possible exception of noodlewhores (finally seeing the pattern?), most people marry within their race. That's why, as I've said, it's not really about the total numbers, but about the gender ratio, and which groups' women are more likely to choose foreigners over their own men when given the chance, which, as that study clearly shows, usually happens to Russians when they come into contact with minorities in their country.
The researchers even calculated the endogamy scores for the groups there, and you can clearly see that Russians tend to be less endogamous than many of those minorities who, despite being massively outnumbered by ethnic Russians (who, according to you, are also boosted by being white), they still overwhelmingly choose their own people, and when they do mix with Russians, it's mostly minority men dating and marrying ethnic Russian women.
Boyo really looked at data which says that everyone, white and non-white, is doing the same thing and preferring and mostly marrying their own, and said that it proves that whites somehow have it better because of that.
1. In all the data you showed, only these facts remain:Cool, now look at the actual marriage/sexhaving/cohabitation data that actually mean something in the real world:
The absolute only racial group in the West that struggles because of their race are East Asians, while in the UK at least, Slavs/EEs also join them as the only groups whose women are more likely to marry out than their men. In the US, blacks are much more likely to marry white women that vice versa, while Latinos, Indians and others mostly tie with white guys or slightly lose, but then make up for it since all of them have higher fertility with white women than white men have with their women.
For ethnics, all ethnic man-white woman couples have a higher fertility than JBW ones
Interesting:feelsstudy::feelsjuice:. Racial Pairings and Fertility: Do Interracial Couples Have Fewer Children? These data also indicate substantial variation in fertility across different racial-gender pairings (Table 2, off-diagonal cells). Of these racial pairings, fertility was lowest...incels.is
The preferences studies like the one you just cited are, frankly, completely meaningless unless there's a study that actually matters, with actual marriage/sex/children data backing it up.
Obviously in a majority white country, people are going to prefer the majority, or at least not kick them out of their dating pool, given that the other populations are smaller.
I could equally simply cite this Egyptian study where they asked women their preferred skin color in men, with the majority picking brown, followed by black and white in the last place:
The Impact of Male Physical Attractiveness in Predicting Wives' Marital Satisfaction
Physical qualities assumes a significant part in deciding allure. This examination expects to assess the effect of male physical engaging quality in anticipating spouses' conjugal fulfillment. The current examination was led on 350 female members. The greater part of them were 20-39 years of age...bjas.journals.ekb.eg
Same principle as the study you showed. In a brown country, most people prefer brown, while in a white country, most people prefer white. Both of those are equally meaningless without actual real-world results data supporting them.
Total numbers are meaningless, it's the ratios that matter. You can have however many of your men marrying foreign women, as long as your women are marrying out more, you're losing. It's as simple as that.
Using this exact logic, you might as well say that outmarriage isn't a problem anywhere outside of the West (where, as mentioned, it's a problem only for East Asians), since no place has anywhere as much interracial relationship as it has. 99%+ of marriages in China, for example, are between two Chinese, but since noodles there are about twice as likely to marry foreigners as their male counterparts are, that means that they are losing out to foreigners.
Same thing here. There might not be as many international marriages in Russia as in the US, but since Russian women are overwhelmingly more likely to be the ones doing so, which is the case in other Slavic countries as well, that means that the local men are losing to those foreigners. It's that simple.
Yes? I have gone over that study since I posted it and made sure to write out for each of the studied regions which ethnicities were more likely to have their men marry Russian women (which were most of them), and for which the reverse was true (which was a much smaller amount.)
Yes, most people marry within their group. Not just in Russia, but worldwide. Even in the US, with the possible exception of noodlewhores (finally seeing the pattern?), most people marry within their race. That's why, as I've said, it's not really about the total numbers, but about the gender ratio, and which groups' women are more likely to choose foreigners over their own men when given the chance, which, as that study clearly shows, usually happens to Russians when they come into contact with minorities in their country.
The researchers even calculated the endogamy scores for the groups there, and you can clearly see that Russians tend to be less endogamous than many of those minorities who, despite being massively outnumbered by ethnic Russians (who, according to you, are also boosted by being white), they still overwhelmingly choose their own people, and when they do mix with Russians, it's mostly minority men dating and marrying ethnic Russian women.
Boyo really looked at data which says that everyone, white and non-white, is doing the same thing and preferring and mostly marrying their own, and said that it proves that whites somehow have it better because of that.
Boyo really looked at data which says that everyone, white and non-white, is doing the same thing and preferring and mostly marrying their own, and said that it proves that whites somehow have it better because of that.
goodI can't wait when we nuke the world
Slavs will nuke soon
And again. Do you even fucking READ the studies you postCool, now look at the actual marriage/sexhaving/cohabitation data that actually mean something in the real world:
The absolute only racial group in the West that struggles because of their race are East Asians, while in the UK at least, Slavs/EEs also join them as the only groups whose women are more likely to marry out than their men. In the US, blacks are much more likely to marry white women that vice versa, while Latinos, Indians and others mostly tie with white guys or slightly lose, but then make up for it since all of them have higher fertility with white women than white men have with their women.
For ethnics, all ethnic man-white woman couples have a higher fertility than JBW ones
Interesting:feelsstudy::feelsjuice:. Racial Pairings and Fertility: Do Interracial Couples Have Fewer Children? These data also indicate substantial variation in fertility across different racial-gender pairings (Table 2, off-diagonal cells). Of these racial pairings, fertility was lowest...incels.is
The preferences studies like the one you just cited are, frankly, completely meaningless unless there's a study that actually matters, with actual marriage/sex/children data backing it up.
Obviously in a majority white country, people are going to prefer the majority, or at least not kick them out of their dating pool, given that the other populations are smaller.
I could equally simply cite this Egyptian study where they asked women their preferred skin color in men, with the majority picking brown, followed by black and white in the last place:
The Impact of Male Physical Attractiveness in Predicting Wives' Marital Satisfaction
Physical qualities assumes a significant part in deciding allure. This examination expects to assess the effect of male physical engaging quality in anticipating spouses' conjugal fulfillment. The current examination was led on 350 female members. The greater part of them were 20-39 years of age...bjas.journals.ekb.eg
Same principle as the study you showed. In a brown country, most people prefer brown, while in a white country, most people prefer white. Both of those are equally meaningless without actual real-world results data supporting them.
Total numbers are meaningless, it's the ratios that matter. You can have however many of your men marrying foreign women, as long as your women are marrying out more, you're losing. It's as simple as that.
Using this exact logic, you might as well say that outmarriage isn't a problem anywhere outside of the West (where, as mentioned, it's a problem only for East Asians), since no place has anywhere as much interracial relationship as it has. 99%+ of marriages in China, for example, are between two Chinese, but since noodles there are about twice as likely to marry foreigners as their male counterparts are, that means that they are losing out to foreigners.
Same thing here. There might not be as many international marriages in Russia as in the US, but since Russian women are overwhelmingly more likely to be the ones doing so, which is the case in other Slavic countries as well, that means that the local men are losing to those foreigners. It's that simple.
Yes? I have gone over that study since I posted it and made sure to write out for each of the studied regions which ethnicities were more likely to have their men marry Russian women (which were most of them), and for which the reverse was true (which was a much smaller amount.)
Yes, most people marry within their group. Not just in Russia, but worldwide. Even in the US, with the possible exception of noodlewhores (finally seeing the pattern?), most people marry within their race. That's why, as I've said, it's not really about the total numbers, but about the gender ratio, and which groups' women are more likely to choose foreigners over their own men when given the chance, which, as that study clearly shows, usually happens to Russians when they come into contact with minorities in their country.
The researchers even calculated the endogamy scores for the groups there, and you can clearly see that Russians tend to be less endogamous than many of those minorities who, despite being massively outnumbered by ethnic Russians (who, according to you, are also boosted by being white), they still overwhelmingly choose their own people, and when they do mix with Russians, it's mostly minority men dating and marrying ethnic Russian women.
Boyo really looked at data which says that everyone, white and non-white, is doing the same thing and preferring and mostly marrying their own, and said that it proves that whites somehow have it better because of that.
Nigguh chill out man1. In all the data you showed, only these facts remain:
Niggers and spics have lots of sex with other niggers and spics - wow shocker. Is anyone surprised? Those cultures have terrible inhibitions and attitudes towards sex. You wouldn’t be retarded enough to suggest niggers are fucking all the white women when you included this image? Right? I don’t think you’d suggest something that stupid.
2. “ Of all the mixed race kids, white women have 3x more children with blacks than men do with blacks!”
Yes, tyrone brings over his lack of birth control abilities whenever a mediocre (usually fat) white foid decides to try a tyrone. Notice how the dumb fucking foids go back to seeking white chads on tinder (anecdotal again but if you have a brain you should understand). Once again, you’re taking 12% of white male and female dating choices and say that applies to the whole population. How come you don’t say the same shit for men? In all your studies it shows men have children with black women too. With your flawless logic wouldn’t that mean “BRO BLACK GIRLS ARE WAY MORE ATTRACTIVE THAN WHITES BRO EVEN THOUGH ONLY 5% of white fathers have black kids BLACK SKIN IS IN BRO WHITE GIRLS SHOULD PAINT THEMSELVES BLACK“ you see how stupid that sounds?
You are so eager to be the most incel in this forum and try to twist the data to say that you have it the worst, everyone in here does that shit.
You’re laughing. By your OWN take you’re agreeing that white men must obviously prefer non whites because 11% of them have kids with nonwhites! And then you say looking at studies of their dating preferences on apps or just fucking asking them is not data that should be looked at??? Imagine if I said this shit and kept call the entire site liars whenever a white guy says he likes white women
you can’t see the retardation in how wrong that is? you completely ignored that 90% of the population PICKED. PICKED. Their own race instead of racemixing. And you say “well that’s uhh that’s just expected bro thats obvious but it means nothing bro jbw is myth”.
You’ve lost all credibility about this stupid distraction, “brown is better” jfl keep coping the whole site knows how ape brained that take is, this thread is gay, Wasting our damn time with this
Are you NT?Seriously do you think I could ascend in Poland or Russia? My 5'5 turbo manlet height is my only failo. I otherwise I can have a good face.
Yeah for the most partAre you NT?
Yeah then you could probably find a polish gf.Yeah for the most part
But average height in Poland is 5'11, I would get mogged hardYeah then you could probably find a polish gf.
True I'm 5'7ft and I only height mog boomers here.But average height in Poland is 5'11, I would get mogged hard
165cm for foid is like 40th imo and ive never seen anyone who was shorter in a couple than a foid (maybe once per year)But average height in Poland is 5'11, I would get mogged hard
Irrelevant. They have sex, that's all that matters. If anything, "terrible inhibitions and attitudes towards sex" would be ones preventing their people from having sex.Niggers and spics have lots of sex with other niggers and spics - wow shocker. Is anyone surprised? Those cultures have terrible inhibitions and attitudes towards sex.
Bruh what? I never even implied who those people are having sex with, because it's frankly irrelevant. Sex is sex. I know that a fair number of guys here for some reason worship white women and seem to only consider sex with them to be true ascension, which is bullshit.You wouldn’t be retarded enough to suggest niggers are fucking all the white women when you included this image? Right? I don’t think you’d suggest something that stupid.
When have I applied that to the whole population? Literally when have I even implied that all whites prefer blacks or non-whites in general? Bruh, no offense, but I don't even really get what you're arguing right now. What I was saying is that, while most people pick their own group, when interracial and other intergroup relationships do happen, for most groups, the gender ratios are roughly equal, except for white/Asian pairings where white men do very well with Asian women, and white/black pairings, where white women and black men very much attract each other, which implies that whatever advantage white men might inherently have must be rather small.Once again, you’re taking 12% of white male and female dating choices and say that applies to the whole population.
Again, when have I implied that blacks are more attractive than whites? Read again what I wrote in the paragraphs above. The black-white intermarriage rates are worthy of being pointed out in those debates since they are just as much a proof against JBW working for men as the white/Asian ones are proof of it, with the other pairings being neutral in this.How come you don’t say the same shit for men? In all your studies it shows men have children with black women too. With your flawless logic wouldn’t that mean “BRO BLACK GIRLS ARE WAY MORE ATTRACTIVE THAN WHITES BRO EVEN THOUGH ONLY 5% of white fathers have black kids BLACK SKIN IS IN BRO WHITE GIRLS SHOULD PAINT THEMSELVES BLACK“ you see how stupid that sounds?
Maybe, but that's the funny thing about this data. They show everyone being mostly the same inceldom-wise, except for ricecels in the West, who clearly are a bit below the others.You are so eager to be the most incel in this forum and try to twist the data to say that you have it the worst, everyone in here does that shit.
Again, when have I said that white women prefer nonwhites? Both white men and women marry out and have children with nonwhites at similar numbers, white men more so with Asians than Asian men with white women, and white women more so with blacks than black women with white men. Roughly equal for the other white/non-white pairings. That is something wildly contrary to how many people here have been interesting the JBW stuff, which says that white men have a massive advantage over non-whites on the dating market.You’re laughing. By your OWN take you’re agreeing that white men must obviously prefer non whites because 11% of them have kids with nonwhites!
It should be looked at, but it should also be kept in mind that, in the end, it's the actual dating/marriage etc. data that matters. It's interesting to see who prefers whom, but if in the end people from all of those different groups have sex equally as much, then those preferences quite clearly have no effect on the inceldom of anyone in those groups.And then you say looking at studies of their dating preferences on apps or just fucking asking them is not data that should be looked at???
???Imagine if I said this shit and kept call the entire site liars whenever a white guy says he likes white women
Well, yeah, that is expected because interracial marriages/dating and so on are a minority for every group, apart from possibly Asian women.you can’t see the retardation in how wrong that is? you completely ignored that 90% of the population PICKED. PICKED. Their own race instead of racemixing. And you say “well that’s uhh that’s just expected bro thats obvious but it means nothing bro jbw is myth”.
Bruh, once again, you're misunderstanding what I've said. I'm not claiming that brown is better, I'm just pointing out that, given that those types of preferences can vary based on the country, because sexual imprinting is a real thing and it can be done with non-parents as well:You’ve lost all credibility about this stupid distraction, “brown is better” jfl keep coping the whole site knows how ape brained that take is, this thread is gay, Wasting our damn time with this
At this point, I'm not even sure what JBW is to you. From your previous posts, I thought that you meant that it means that white people have a massive boost to their SMV thanks to their skin color, which is what many ethnics here say. Then, you've said that white people having a preference for their own race, which is something other groups have as well, is proof of JBW, when that's a completely different thing. Now, you're claiming that only a minority of women preferring black skin is JBW, when what they prefer includes brown skin tones.And again. Do you even fucking READ the studies you post
Your egyptian study, done IN BENHA EGYPT, by niggas with names like “abdhalla” ADMITS:
“Among members, 61.4% ladies discover light earthy colored skin of men is
the most alluring skin shading. “
The other 10%? WHITE skin preference, the last 28%? Black.
You are saying 28% of EGYPTIAN women proves the JBW is wrong, completely ignoring that when asked,SIXTY ONE PERCENT (actually 70% if you include those that perefer white) of them chose lighter skin over black. Lmao even the majority of shitskin egyptians prefer shitskin egyptians and lighter skin over blacks Copium level 900
Look I will agree with mostly everything you’re saying. I just refuse to ever beleive that being brown or black is better than being white.Irrelevant. They have sex, that's all that matters. If anything, "terrible inhibitions and attitudes towards sex" would be ones preventing their people from having sex.
Bruh what? I never even implied who those people are having sex with, because it's frankly irrelevant. Sex is sex. I know that a fair number of guys here for some reason worship white women and seem to only consider sex with them to be true ascension, which is bullshit.
When have I applied that to the whole population? Literally when have I even implied that all whites prefer blacks or non-whites in general? Bruh, no offense, but I don't even really get what you're arguing right now. What I was saying is that, while most people pick their own group, when interracial and other intergroup relationships do happen, for most groups, the gender ratios are roughly equal, except for white/Asian pairings where white men do very well with Asian women, and white/black pairings, where white women and black men very much attract each other, which implies that whatever advantage white men might inherently have must be rather small.
As another member described it, it's a slight (I'd even argue very slight) market preference being presented by many people here as an absolute law:
This forum is unironically more White supremacist than Stormfront (most JBW is unfounded cope)
First of all, not everyone here. Whenever JBW debates arise there's a civil war, but those that do believe in JBW as an absolute law of life take it way further than a slight market preference and take it as an absolute universal law. The White supremacy found here is mostly found in...incels.is
Also, I can't help but notice that you seem to be ignoring the population numbers a bit. Not only the general in-group preference basically every group has, but also their numbers will limit how many can intermarry.
Again, when have I implied that blacks are more attractive than whites? Read again what I wrote in the paragraphs above. The black-white intermarriage rates are worthy of being pointed out in those debates since they are just as much a proof against JBW working for men as the white/Asian ones are proof of it, with the other pairings being neutral in this.
That's the same if you do this for women as well, you literally only need to change a few words.
Maybe, but that's the funny thing about this data. They show everyone being mostly the same inceldom-wise, except for ricecels in the West, who clearly are a bit below the others.
Again, when have I said that white women prefer nonwhites? Both white men and women marry out and have children with nonwhites at similar numbers, white men more so with Asians than Asian men with white women, and white women more so with blacks than black women with white men. Roughly equal for the other white/non-white pairings. That is something wildly contrary to how many people here have been interesting the JBW stuff, which says that white men have a massive advantage over non-whites on the dating market.
It should be looked at, but it should also be kept in mind that, in the end, it's the actual dating/marriage etc. data that matters. It's interesting to see who prefers whom, but if in the end people from all of those different groups have sex equally as much, then those preferences quite clearly have no effect on the inceldom of anyone in those groups.
???
Well, yeah, that is expected because interracial marriages/dating and so on are a minority for every group, apart from possibly Asian women.
As I've said, you seem to be forgetting about population numbers. In addition to preferring their own, like most others do as well, whites are also the majority, both in North America and especially so in Europe. No matter how much they try, they will inevitably racemix less than minorities, because there simply aren't enough partners for them to racemix with.
Bruh, once again, you're misunderstanding what I've said. I'm not claiming that brown is better, I'm just pointing out that, given that those types of preferences can vary based on the country, because sexual imprinting is a real thing and it can be done with non-parents as well:
[STUDY] In humans, only attractive females fulfil their sexually imprinted preferences for eye colour
@tehgymcel420 @Gymcelled @Copexodius Maximus @Incline https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-62781-7 Abstract Early exposure to parental features shapes later sexual preferences in fish, birds, and mammals. Here I report that human males’ preferences for a conspicuous trait, colourful...incels.is
Then that further proves that whatever JBW there is, is not an universal law, or anything even close to that.
At this point, I'm not even sure what JBW is to you. From your previous posts, I thought that you meant that it means that white people have a massive boost to their SMV thanks to their skin color, which is what many ethnics here say. Then, you've said that white people having a preference for their own race, which is something other groups have as well, is proof of JBW, when that's a completely different thing. Now, you're claiming that only a minority of women preferring black skin is JBW, when what they prefer includes brown skin tones.
I mean, in the exact same way, we can also put the brown and black skin tone preferences together and get an even bigger majority preferring darker than white skin tones.
JBW is cope, JDBB (Just don't be Black) is reality.
Fair enough brocel. Sorry if I came off as too aggressive or nasty, I'm just used to arguing a lot about stuff like this.Look I will agree with mostly everything you’re saying. I just refuse to ever beleive that being brown or black is better than being white.
We can just both agree that some have a preference for brown skin sometimes (and i’m gonna say those are tyrones and chadguptas) the same way asian women have a preference for whites more than others.
But that doesn’t deny the fact that it would be statistically better to be white. Or like you said the “slight market preference”. For us ethnics we have lived and breathed that our whole lives - no amount of lies can undo the patterns deep in our subconscious. That’s why I get very immeasurably pissed off even some faggot says blacks can’t be Intel, curry and blacks can’t be incel because it’s like saying we don’t exist or that the clear preferences we see around us FOR whites and for chads doesn’t exist.
We will just never fully agree on this and it is what it is. It’s not like any of this will suddenly make women desire me anyway.