Why didn't she tell the swedish fags to leave him alone instead of staying silent until the police arrived?
My first (perhaps misogynistic... which I don't want to be, so I'm going to second-guess it here) instinct is to just say because she's a horrible human being.
However, when I try to think of an alternate explanation here, one seems pretty obvious: she could've been paralyzed with fear.
Not everyone immediately screams when violence erupts. Sometimes you're just petrified.
She might've even made some noise, and just not had it noticed. The Swedes were too busy beating the shit out of Brock to actually notice if she had opened her eyes or spoken anything.
Keep in mind this wasn't a silent night: a party was going on maybe 20 feet away (this was just behind a dumpster next to the house) and there was loud music blaring.
Plus, even if the swedes had noticed her being animated in the midst of attacking Brock: they are NOT going to admit that. The whole reason they aren't having assault charges pressed against them is based on the idea that Emily Doe (Chanel Miller) was supposedly non-responsive and being ~obviously raped~ so they HAD to attack him.
If you can't stop them from reaching their goal by yourself then your approval or disapproval doesn't matter to them.
The approval / disapproval of individuals does matter to groups trying to tip public favor when it's near-gridlock.
My thought process doesn't exist in a void, it can be mirrored in others.
If they do, it should just be seen as a minor annoyance, and not a crime that puts you on a sex offender's registry.
I concur with you about that, although more broadly because I don't believe in having a special status/registry for sex crimes. It's not ilke they have a "murderer registry" where parents get to be notified when a murderer moves into the neighborhood. It's bullshit. Murderers are more dangerous.
Foids dressed like whores get their asses grabbed in clubs all the time, they should be used to it in public too.
I don't believe in a 'dressed like whores' concept. Whether a woman is a slut or a prostitute, she might dress as a nun or as a soldier while doing so. There's just no such thing.
Women will also attack guys in clubs if they get their asses grabbed by non-chads, so there's not really a double standard between recreation in clubs or working to earn money as a waitress in a diner. The double standard is simply between the consequences for violence between 2 people depending on whether it's F>M or M>F.
Whores need to snap out of this "transaction" way of thinking, and just accept that they're put on earth to please men if they decide to be whores.
I do not believe in any kind of inherent purpose for women, I think it's fine for us to determine our own purposes.
In this case there is no evidence the woman was a literal whore (selling sex) though I can understand why you might view her as some kind of metaphorical whore because of how she was dressed revealingly in short-shorts...
Women in many occupations do show off their assets, I think to give them advantages either from their bosses (less work, more raises) or customers (more tips, less complaints) and this understandable makes those of us not able to exploit that envious of their privilege.
They force men to please women by making them follow cucked laws and stealing their tax money.
Until foids are willing to forgo all their government assistance then I see nothing wrong with men stealing minor "transactions" from the ones who dress like sluts.
You make a legitimate point about how they are exploiting men en masse and I do understand the desire to 'even the scales'.
I suppose why I don't see this as any kind of solution is it really doesn't fix the problem. They'll just use shit like this as further justification to win more privileges for themselves.
I know I personally never pursue such "minor transactions" so it's usually just chadlites (who think the girl might like it and might tolerate it, but turn out to be wrong) who actually bother trying it and occasionally getting away with it.
If we actually had enough control over the system to declare "okay lads, as an apology for circumcision and child support inequality, you can grope all the waitress QTs you like" then I think we'd have the power to make more substantial changes.
Since we don't actually have this power, thinking this even approaches justice is just cope. Hell, even if we could achieve that it would be cope, because groping butts isn't anywhere close to sex.
Hell, even if we could just have sex with any woman we wanted, that would still be cope, because they'd still hate us.
I think the only satisfying justice (perhaps a pipe dream) is to actually change the hearts and minds of women to actually love us and validate us and WANT us.
Part of pursuing that is certainly in our court (better ourselves by being less obese, for example, so a greater portion of us are attractive to women) but it's blue-pill to think that a unilateral effort toward self-improvement from men would somehow achieve this in isolation. Women have to improve themselves too (make a greater portion of themselves attractive to men by also becoming less obese, for example) so it is a cooperative effort to find happiness, but I don't know how we can convince them to do this.
It's a change I don't think coercion could accomplish. Negotiation on an intellectual seems like a pipe dream... how do we bridge the gap between our thinking?
I wonder if some of it is a "blink first" situation, like men don't bother getting ripped because they think women won't like them even if they do, and women don't bother being thin+chaste because they don't think men will get ripped for them and commit to them so they just settle on being occasional cumdumps for chads/chadlites.
I focus too much on obesity as obviously there's less mutable stuff (height, face) which is far more expensive to fix with surgery. I guess obesity is just an easy one to focus on because it's so prevalent. We'd have a lot more mutually fulfilling relationships out there if both genders were gym-maxing consistently.
It's not just about physical attraction but also lifestyle choices too, I suppose. I wish there was a way to have women see the merit in fringe hobbies, as I think the minority engaging in them are just trying to fill special niches with only a minority holding actual acceptance and elevating of those hobbies. It's like they're slumming in a hobby hoping to snag a chad who is briefly interested in a hobby so they can leave it together.
