All women today are whores, all women today are human toilets, literal whores are just that to a larger degree.
Looking at this objectively:
There is no real difference between taking a woman out on a date where the collective cost (food, drinks, transportation, etc) is $500, and simply paying a prostitute $500 directly to fuck.
There is no real difference between a woman who has fucked 100 men in a year and a woman who has fucked 500 men in a year (whores have repeat customers, so a more appropriate sentence structure would be "100 times" or "500 times" a year).
I've identified two blue pilled concepts that are at the core mindset of incels unwilling to pay for sex:
1. Dating, Marraige, etc isn't payment for sex - YES IT ACTUALLY IS, BUT YOU ARE LAUGHABLY PAYING TO GAMBLE FOR A CHANCE TO FUCK RATHER THAN PAYING JUST TO GET THE SEX WITHOUT THE GAMES. All non-platonic interactions between men and woman function under a model of prostitution, all of it. If you've deluded yourself into thinking that you "aren't really paying for it" because you took a woman out on a date or bought her drinks then you have fallen hook line and sinker for this blue pilled concept.
Its all semantic games, dating, marriage, etc are COVERT FORMS OF PROSTITUTION. You are still paying, just indirectly, and with a "gamble mechanic" added to the "game" to create the illusion of "choice" allowing the woman to refuse, its implied though by the social construct that she should have sex with you. Its all just a convoluted way for humans to participate in prostitution in a "guilt free" manner, so we can still stroke our egos as being "better than animals" while essentially functioning as they do.
2. Arbitrary personal scale of how many past sexual partners are "too much" before a woman is seen as "used goods" - THERE'S ONLY ONE ANSWER................... ONE.
Mens standards have surely fallen in these times, in the past a woman would not even be worthy of marriage if she was no longer a virgin, mothers would break down and cry for the fate of their daughters if they had gave it up to some random dude, women were scared to lose it without marriage. A family's "status" in a community, especially that of the father, was tied to the virginity of the family's daughters, failing to remain one before marriage brought shame upon your family name and reflected badly on your father, lowering the prestige of your family.
Now we have guys setting these arbitrary numbers in their heads, and every guy has a different one:
"As long as its not more than 1, maybe 2, anything more than that and she's a whore"
"I mean if she didn't cross 5 guys she's a quality woman, it shows she has restraint"
"Hey as long as she didn't get gangbanged in college that's wife material right there"
Every one of those guys thinks he's "black pilled" or "red pilled" about women and he "knows how to pick em". They don't realize that their standards are "wavering" with the changing times and are ridiculously blue pilled.
A lot of incels keep making these kind of arguments when it comes to prostitution and why they wouldn't pay for sex - "She's had 100 dicks this week"
Ok, but your oneitis who you would marry if given the chance, and pay her more than the whore asks for, has likely had 50 to 100 dicks in a year, does that really make a difference, she's still a whore, your arbitrary number doesn't mean shit, if she's had more than zero dicks she's already tarnished.
Actual Black Piller: "No Hymen, No Diamond, JBF (Just Be First) Theory is all that counts, if she has had sex with anyone but me I'll fuck her, but I won't marry her"
Oh and here's why that reasoning is valid:
Looking at this objectively:
There is no real difference between taking a woman out on a date where the collective cost (food, drinks, transportation, etc) is $500, and simply paying a prostitute $500 directly to fuck.
There is no real difference between a woman who has fucked 100 men in a year and a woman who has fucked 500 men in a year (whores have repeat customers, so a more appropriate sentence structure would be "100 times" or "500 times" a year).
I've identified two blue pilled concepts that are at the core mindset of incels unwilling to pay for sex:
1. Dating, Marraige, etc isn't payment for sex - YES IT ACTUALLY IS, BUT YOU ARE LAUGHABLY PAYING TO GAMBLE FOR A CHANCE TO FUCK RATHER THAN PAYING JUST TO GET THE SEX WITHOUT THE GAMES. All non-platonic interactions between men and woman function under a model of prostitution, all of it. If you've deluded yourself into thinking that you "aren't really paying for it" because you took a woman out on a date or bought her drinks then you have fallen hook line and sinker for this blue pilled concept.
Its all semantic games, dating, marriage, etc are COVERT FORMS OF PROSTITUTION. You are still paying, just indirectly, and with a "gamble mechanic" added to the "game" to create the illusion of "choice" allowing the woman to refuse, its implied though by the social construct that she should have sex with you. Its all just a convoluted way for humans to participate in prostitution in a "guilt free" manner, so we can still stroke our egos as being "better than animals" while essentially functioning as they do.
2. Arbitrary personal scale of how many past sexual partners are "too much" before a woman is seen as "used goods" - THERE'S ONLY ONE ANSWER................... ONE.
Mens standards have surely fallen in these times, in the past a woman would not even be worthy of marriage if she was no longer a virgin, mothers would break down and cry for the fate of their daughters if they had gave it up to some random dude, women were scared to lose it without marriage. A family's "status" in a community, especially that of the father, was tied to the virginity of the family's daughters, failing to remain one before marriage brought shame upon your family name and reflected badly on your father, lowering the prestige of your family.
Now we have guys setting these arbitrary numbers in their heads, and every guy has a different one:
"As long as its not more than 1, maybe 2, anything more than that and she's a whore"
"I mean if she didn't cross 5 guys she's a quality woman, it shows she has restraint"
"Hey as long as she didn't get gangbanged in college that's wife material right there"
Every one of those guys thinks he's "black pilled" or "red pilled" about women and he "knows how to pick em". They don't realize that their standards are "wavering" with the changing times and are ridiculously blue pilled.
A lot of incels keep making these kind of arguments when it comes to prostitution and why they wouldn't pay for sex - "She's had 100 dicks this week"
Ok, but your oneitis who you would marry if given the chance, and pay her more than the whore asks for, has likely had 50 to 100 dicks in a year, does that really make a difference, she's still a whore, your arbitrary number doesn't mean shit, if she's had more than zero dicks she's already tarnished.
Actual Black Piller: "No Hymen, No Diamond, JBF (Just Be First) Theory is all that counts, if she has had sex with anyone but me I'll fuck her, but I won't marry her"
Oh and here's why that reasoning is valid:
Last edited:
