Correct:
en.wikipedia.org
And 80% is shocking tbh, I consider myself a 50-50 on this, with half of IQ being genetic the others being environmental, though I am aware that at a young age you are more susceptible to environmental factors.
See above, most modern scientists would disagree with that statement
Yes, that is correct
I partially believe that, due to what was shared here:
Essentially, these found that Blacks with more White ancestry tended to perform better cognitively based on those studies above.
They also found certain MTAG-derived SNPs correlate strongly with IQ.
I've never denied education & the such don't play a role, for the 10'000th time.
Never said it was the full case, you're putting words in my mouth now, I said it's part of the case
Look at tons of SEA countries or China, all were colonized and/or had influence on them & now are growing insanely.
The argument myself & others are making, is that due to these races having been genetically complete in these regions & then evolving over time to it, and thus having certain alleles.
"The colder the winter temperatures and the more northerly the environment, the higher were the IQs that evolved. In corroboration of this thesis, Templer & Arikawa (2006) have reported a correlation across 129 nations of .66 between national IQs and low winter temperatures"
Also, this is how IQ tests are done:
." In
many studies conducted in Kenya and other African countries, the Raven’s Progressive Matrices and the Raven’s Colored Progressive Matrices are used to measure IQs. The RCPM is a culturally unbiased test comprising mostly of shapes meant to measure spatial and reasoning ability. Unlike the verbal tests, these tests are highly g-loaded and exert significant demands on the examinees’ cognitive faculties"
View: https://zinahissa.medium.com/are-iq-tests-biased-against-africans-2e1bfd4a8b63
You amounting the argument to this fully would be the same as me amounting it all to genetics. Again, never denied the role of environment but firstly, Whites actually helped many countries progress industrially under colonialism, though ofc I don't deny various mistreatment did occur.
Also, you seem to imply it is
all Whites benefiting from Neo-liberal capitalism, when these countries
do not work in favor of Whites aka the working-middle class ones, richfags are different.
China? They seem to be holding just fine & are now challenging the US, so they haven't faced much intervention. I even admitted to
@Made in Heaven & some other Sands here that we fucked up in Iraq, Syria, etc. and those places would be well off.
Yet how did this culture manifest itself? I'm aware, wherever poverty is present crime can grow(Irish mob, Italian mafia, etc) but the thing is, it seems to be
They do, and it is ofc noticeable & somewhat significant. As I've explained, we need to just apply Occam's razor. Sure, it is all valid to say that the environment does play a role, but then how can we also say genetics play a role in helping develop that of looks & possibly diseases & the heritability of various mental issues, and then somehow say that race(aka appearance defined by genes) somehow doesn't matter at all?
LatAm? That doesn't count, and Blacks in the UK are quite similar to the ones in the US
As explained:
.
Hispanics are a poor group to measure, since it's an identity, unless you meant Mestizo, and many are mixed with black
Also:
The most dangerous cities in the world are found in Mexico. Colima tops the list.
www.statista.com
Hispanics are a mixed race, meaning genetic recombination screws them up.
As for Rednecks, I've been around tons, most are low-IQ & are not exactly smart people, but I never had an issue with one aside from their loudmouths. Most I knew were hard working, blue collar folks.
There is still crime in those, what makes you think otherwise? And can you at least show something to prove this?
View attachment 1416126
Incorrect:
View attachment 1416133
Background During the colonization of the world, after dispersal out of African, modern humans encountered changeable environments and substantial phenotypic variations that involve diverse behaviors, lifestyles and cultures, were generated among the different modern human populations. Results...
bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com
Basically tons of things related to neurological development differs by population.
If it could impact stuff related to disease, which ofc ties into genes related to SNPs & the such, then how could it not possibly impact other areas of your biology related to such?
But for just phenotype(appearance) alone yes, that would be valid.
I disagree, for reasons explained above
