Blacks are only more violent because their culture encourages it

[Blackpill Monk]

This is the Typical low IQ response from a race "realist"

Go back to reddit you brainwashed SJW

 

[Devoteecel]

Defending colored people is not gay

Why do you defend them? Niggers are disgusting and hate us.

 

[Logic55]

Go back to reddit you brainwashed SJW

I got permabanned from reddit because of my Incel rhetoric.

 

[Logic55]

Why do you defend them? Niggers are disgusting and hate us.

I defend all colored people. Black people are nice to me. You are a person of color too. Stop denying it.

 

[Devoteecel]

I defend all colored people. Black people are nice to me. You are a person of color too. Stop denying it.

I'm a lightskinned person of color. I'm not a fucking nigger. Defending niggers is like defending foids. Niggers won't suck your faggot dick for simping for them. Niggers have tried to rob me.

 

[Logic55]

Defending niggers is like defending foids

Nonsense.

 

[Logic55]

Niggers won't suck your faggot dick for simping for them.

I don't want attention from blacks.

 

[Devoteecel]

I don't want attention from blacks.

Then why do you fucking defend worthless animals?

 

[Logic55]

Then why do you fucking defend worthless animals?

I don't view them as animals because I met a lot of blacks who are normal people. And I was robbed one time by a white passing Hispanic guy.

 

[Devoteecel]

I don't view them as animals because I met a lot of blacks who are normal people. And I was robbed one time by a white passing Hispanic guy.

The guy probably didn't speak English.

 

[Logic55]

The guy probably didn't speak English.

He was speaking English to me.

 

[DarkStar]

it really isnt

Check this out:

Here we apply this technique to examine SIRE differences in g. We find that
African and Amerindian ancestry are strongly negatively associated with general
cognitive ability among African, Hispanic, and other American subsamples. This
replicates previous research which showed that genetic ancestry predicts
cognitive ability, independent of socioeconomic status and phenotypic
discrimination variables which are the usual suspects (Kirkegaard et al., 2019;
Lasker et al., 2019; Warne, 2020). The importance of such analyses within SIRE
groups is that they shed light on the cause of g differences between SIRE groups
with respect to similarities in developmental processes (Rowe, Vazsonyi &
Flannery, 1994)

The ancestry effects are consistent in direction across subsamples and hold
after controlling for a wide array of economic and social factors, including migrant
status, SIRE, ethnic attachment, measures of discrimination, phenotypic indices
of race, and general SES. These results suggest that African, Hispanic, and other
groups have inherited alleles from their African and Amerindian ancestors which
make them liable to lower levels of g. In fact, as seen in Table 5 (Model 2), 100%,
76%, 81%, and 100% of the respective Black, Native American, Other, and
Hispanic SIRE effects were explained by genetic ancestry. This association
between genetic ancestry and g suggests a partial genetic basis for observed
SIRE differences.

t should be noted that the polygenic scores represent genetic variation that
is caused by common alleles, not genetic variation that is caused by rare alleles
under mutation-selection balance. The causal alleles that are tapped by polygenic
scores are ancient. Most were already polymorphic 60,000 years ago when
people left Africa and spread all over Eurasia. Today’s racial allele frequency
differences are the cumulative effects of selection and genetic drift acting over
more than 2,000 generations, while rare variants under mutation-selection
balance are much younger, no more than one or two millennia or even less.
Therefore it is predictable that genetic race differences that evolved over a long
time are differences in polygenic scores but not necessarily differences in
mutational load. The latter are the result of strength of selection during the last
centuries.
Overall, the results suggest that genetic variants related to general cognitive
ability vary between source genetic populations and have a causal effect on
intelligence. Because individuals within SIRE groups differ in their proportion of
African, European and Amerindian ancestors, general cognitive ability varies by
genetic ancestry within SIRE group

https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8611/1/1/34

We conducted an admixture study to assess the association between cognitive ability and European ancestry in the African- and European-American populations. Earlier researchers (e.g., [51,52]) were unable to detect significant relationships between ancestry and cognitive ability. We, however, found a strong, significant association between European genetic ancestry and cognitive ability, confirming the recent results of both Kirkegaard et al. [24] and Warne [25].

Rushton and Jensen [9] called for modern genetic studies to test the hereditarian model. They predicted that “for those Black individuals who possess more White genes, their physical, behavioral, and other characteristics will approach those of Whites” ([9], p. 262). In the present study, we confirmed that this was the case for general cognitive ability. Moreover, we showed that the association between European ancestry and g was substantially mediated by eduPGS rather than skin color PGS. These results provide support for a hereditarian model.

We also evaluated the transethnic validity of eduPGS. We found that the eduPGS with the highest validity for g in both the African- and European-American samples was the MTAG_EA_10K set. Although the validity in the African-American sample was approximately half of that in the European-American sample (rAA = 0.1115; rEA = 0.2269), the relations were statistically significant in both populations (p < 0.0001). As with Piffer [111] we found large African-/European-American differences in these eduPGS (d = 1.89). Using the beta in the African-American sample and controlling for the effect of European ancestry (B = 0.124; Model 1b; Table 10), we estimate that the known eduPGS can naïvely explain as much as 20%–25% of the African-/European-American intelligence gap.
Removing variants with low MAF in African 1000 Genomes lineages had little effect on the validity of MTAG_10K eduPGS among African and European-Americans. Thus, contrary to some arguments, European-specific alleles do not seem to be biasing prediction with eduPGS. Our results corroborate those of Piffer [111] who found a strong ecological correlation between MTAG-derived SNPs and population IQ (r = 0.86). We also found, using both regression and path analysis that, while the eduPGS mediates the association between European ancestry and cognitive ability, skin color scores do not

Race and IQ news + new studies

Controversial new studies and content on: Chinese IQ, Ashkenazi IQ, mixed-race IQ.

thuletide.wordpress.com

I mean yeah because they live near each other?

Partially the reason, but also because they all share similar origins which genetics explains the story of:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hEOJuK64BM&t=1462s

on the other hand you have hillbillies and rednecks that behave similarly to ghetto blacks since they're lower on the socioeconomic end

Check this out:

I've been around rednecks & while they are not very smart, they are much more trustworthy & civil than most Blacks.

I heard that the police falsely imprisons blacks at a disproportionate rate

Data shows African Americans are more likely to be wrongfully convicted | Criminology, Law and Society

African Americans are more likely to be wrongfully convicted of murder, rape and drug crimes than white people, and those who are exonerated spend more time in prison before they are released, according to a recent report by the National Registry of Exonerations.

cls.soceco.uci.edu

that could be a factor as well

Even if so, it doesn't change the fact Blacks overwhelmingly commit crime

I agree there appears to be some degree of systemic discrimination against blacks in court justice system

Although it doesn't explain why black communities have much higher rates of murder and criminal violence than other racial communities

US cities with the highest murder rates (Baltimore, St. Louis, New Orleans, Milwaukee, Detroit), most of them have one thing in common

If street criminality can be influenced by poverty and low economic opportunities, then why are rates of street violence much higher for lower class black neighbourhoods, compared with lower class non-black neighbourhoods in the United States and other countries?

This also

 

[DarkStar]

You are a person of color too.

Pointless term made to create a "White v. Non-White" narrative

Frankly, if I was an East Asian Rice or Levantine/Persian/Turk Sand, I'd be insulted to be lumped in with Curries, Spics, Junglerices, and Nafris.

 

[blackpillednigga]

View attachment 1414786

the slope and differences arent that high. which means the differences could still easily be environmental rather than genetic. also it's still unknown whether IQ is mainly determined by inheritance or the environment as theres no definite proof for either

Race and IQ news + new studies

Controversial new studies and content on: Chinese IQ, Ashkenazi IQ, mixed-race IQ.

thuletide.wordpress.com

Partially the reason, but also because they all share similar origins which genetics explains the story of:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hEOJuK64BM&t=1462s


Check this out:

View attachment 1414787

I've been around rednecks & while they are not very smart, they are much more trustworthy & civil than most Blacks.

View attachment 1414789

Even if so, it doesn't change the fact Blacks overwhelmingly commit crime

This also

I would say theres a difference between African-Americans and Africans. afro-americans specifically have a culture where their families are broken and they're taught by their parents to thugmaxx. on the other hand africans dont have that culture but are dirt poor which explains why they also have high crime rates. basically I dont have anything to fully disprove that blacks are inherently violent but theres still a lot of factors that can be at play besides genes, and you're still kinda reaching

 

[La Grande *Infamie*]

Black culture compounds, and is a byproduct of, already existing predilections in the black brain

 

[slavcel11]

And why does their culture encourage it? Because of their genes. Genes manifest themselves in complex human interactions, which take various forms.

 

[Adolf Kitler]

Saying that certain races are more violent than others because of genetics is a myth.

 

[KillNiggers]

Idc if they are violent. I just want their death.

 

[odaed]

Antioch High School shooting - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Why don't you dig one up?

 

[Wumbus]

Culture is a byproduct of race

 

[DarkStar]

And why does their culture encourage it? Because of their genes. Genes manifest themselves in complex human interactions, which take various forms.

This.

Here's something interesting:

Here, we demonstrate for the first time a robust association between cultural values of individualism–collectivism and allelic frequency of the serotonin transporter gene, controlling for associated economic and disease factors. Geographical regions characterized by cultural collectivism exhibit a greater prevalence of S allele carriers of the serotonin transporter gene, even when cultural regions rather than nations served as the unit of analysis. Additionally, we show that global variability in historical pathogen prevalence predicts global variability in individualism–collectivism owing to genetic selection of the S allele of the serotonin transporter gene in regions characterized by high collectivism. Importantly, we also reveal a novel and surprising negative association between individualism–collectivism, frequency of S allele carriers of the serotonin transporter gene and global prevalence of anxiety and mood disorder. Across nations, both collectivism and allelic frequency of the S allele negatively predict global prevalence of anxiety and mood disorders. Critically, our results further indicate that greater population frequency of S allele carriers is associated with decreased prevalence of anxiety and mood disorders due to increased cultural collectivism.

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2009.1650

In this scheme, nomadic subsistence strategies would require more creativity than sedentary ones, which would require more long-term planning but otherwise relatively little creativity. In fact, there seem to be various genetic differences between nomadic and sedentary people:

We know of a gene that may play a part in this story: the 7R (for 7-repeat) allele of the DRD4 (dopamine receptor D4) gene. It is associated with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), a behavioral syndrome best characterized by actions that annoy elementary school teachers: restless-impulsive behavior, inattention, distractibility, and the like.

The polymorphism is found at varying but significant levels in many parts of the world, but is almost totally absent from East Asia. Interestingly, alleles derived from the 7R allele are fairly common in China, even though the 7R alleles themselves are extremely rare there. It is possible that individuals bearing these alleles were selected against because of cultural patterns in China. The Japanese say that the nail that sticks out is hammered down, but in China it may have been pulled out and thrown away.

ADHD is associated with a higher level of creativity. Conformism and obedience to authority that are associated with those farming cultures are negatively correlated with creativity. In fact, it seems that agricultural societies select against creative personalities! East Asian cultures are renowned for their high productivity and work ethos, much less so for their creativity. China, like most agricultural societies, was once a hotbed of innovation. Considering its huge population, China’s contribution to innovation seems mediocre at best. China is much better at copying Western innovations than coming up with its own.

View: https://andreashofer72.medium.com/the-evolutionary-psychology-of-human-creativity-a1d7b3d2643d

 

[DarkStar]

the slope and differences arent that high. which means the differences could still easily be environmental rather than genetic. also it's still unknown whether IQ is mainly determined by inheritance or the environment as theres no definite proof for either

Did you even read it? This was analyzing various alleles & SNPs correlates with intelligence

And I'd say it's still noticeably different.

I would say theres a difference between African-Americans and Africans

Genetically yes, African Americans on average could have some substantial European DNA.

. afro-americans specifically have a culture where their families are broken

Africa has this also:

Over 60% of SA’s children are born to unmarried mothers. Most single parent households are created because the parents were never married. High divorce and paternal death rates due to HIV/AIDS, account for the rest

For example, the population census of Burkina Faso in 2006 showed that single parents with children constituted 9.2% of all nuclear households and 80% of these households were single mother families (United Nations Statistics Division 2014). Also, in sub-Saharan Africa the percentage of children who live with a single parent ranges between 13% in Nigeria and 43% in South Africa (Lippman et al. 2014).

This also reminds me of how Shaniqus have some Tyrone baby daddy, while Urkel gets nothing:

Scholars of the African traditional family agree that the one widely known aspect that distinguishes the African traditional family, say from the European one, is the perversity of polygamy3. Although polygamy is the act of an individual being married to more than one spouse at the same time, the more commonly practiced in Africa is polygyny “….the legal marriage of one man to two or more women concurrently – is permitted.”4 This author argues that because of its perversity, the presence and absence of polygyny was a significant determinant and indicator of the nature of virtually every African social group; whether tribe, clan, or extended family, whether matrilineality or patrilineality was practiced, bride price existed, and how children were raised.

Polygyny was widely practiced in Africa and it often formed the backbone of the traditional African family patterns. According to Mair, “….the polygynous joint family, consisting of a man, his wives, and their children, is the ideal for most Africans.”5 Studies conducted from the 1930s to 1950s indicate that polygyny was common virtually in all regions of Africa.6

The Traditional African Family – Mwizenge S. Tembo

and they're taught by their parents to thugmaxx

Not in every case. I met plenty who had parents who seemingly tried to steer them from them if anything, but that didn't work out. I partly blame society & cucked normies for falling for the "muh slavery n reparations" guilt trip shit.

. on the other hand africans dont have that culture but are dirt poor which explains why they also have high crime rates. basically I dont have anything to fully disprove that blacks are inherently violent but theres still a lot of factors that can be at play besides genes, and you're still kinda reaching

reaching by attributing genes to behavior? I'm sorry, but if anything you're reaching here

I've never denied environment doesn't play a role, but then how can populations which evolved in certain climates, interacting with populations in certain ways, not have selected for certain traits and/or will have manners "ingrained" into them?

Genetics don't just determine looks, they can determine a lot.

 

[Logic55]

I've never denied environment doesn't play a role, but then how can populations which evolved in certain climates, interacting with populations in certain ways, not have selected for certain traits and/or will have manners "ingrained" into them?

The environment matters more then genes when it comes to cultural differences. That's for sure

 

[DarkStar]

The environment matters more then genes when it comes to cultural differences. That's for sure

You always respond with this low-effort, one liners

And no, culture is a byproduct of genes manifesting themselves in various interactions, partially impacted by the environment.

 

[Logic55]

You always respond with this low-effort, one liners

And no, culture is a byproduct of genes manifesting themselves in various interactions, partially impacted by the environment.

The sources you cite downplay importance of socioeconomic factors.

 

[Logic55]

partially impacted by the environment.

Nice joke

 

[DarkStar]

Nice joke

You are a very pretentious, conceited, and generally a prick- you know that right?

I've tried to be civil, but here you are- you are one of the biggest pricks I've ever met

 

[DarkStar]

The sources you cite downplay importance of socioeconomic factors.

Because it's analyzing genes

You are such a Redditor it's unreal

 

[FuckYou]

Get exterminated with their cocks then.

what??

 

[autistspy1]

I mean yeah because they live near each other? on the other hand you have hillbillies and rednecks that behave similarly to ghetto blacks since they're lower on the socioeconomic end

fr, for every ghetto black person I've met far more trashy white morons

 

[DarkStar]

fr, for every ghetto black person I've met far more trashy white morons

t. doesn't even understand the debate here

 

[blackpillednigga]

I've never denied environment doesn't play a role, but then how can populations which evolved in certain climates, interacting with populations in certain ways, not have selected for certain traits and/or will have manners "ingrained" into them?

ik that genes play a role, but this role is almost negligible. lets start with iq. you said previously somewhere that races have an iq "ceiling" aka maximum potential of intelligence. even if thats true, the differences in iq between whites and non-whites could be because whites are more likely to reach their ceiling as they live in 1st world countries and are wealthier on average. you can just say "but their 1st/3rd worldness is a byproduct of their iq" when whites have been conquering the world non-stop preventing a lot of progress in other countries, and still do so today using global neoliberal capitalism. if every non-white country didn't face intervention by western forces then youd have a point. but we know thats not true

and now when it comes to violence, blacks are disproportionately more violent not only because they're poor, but also their thug culture. I'm sure genes might play a role here, but there are blacks in other countries that behave just as normally as the native population since they're completely removed from thug life. rich blacks can still be violent because they still bring their thug culture with them, and there can be rich thugs as well as they're not uncommon. their thug culture is a result of their initial poverty, not because of genes. my proof is that hispanics, other non-whites, and rednecks behave very similarly to blacks despite being a different race. the thing they have in common is being poor. rednecks have lower crime rates because they tend to hang out in rural areas away from civilization, unlike the other poor non-whites

the only actual significant biological differences between races are:
-phenotypes
-chances of getting diseases (like blacks being more likely to get sickle cell)

I think thats literally it. others such as intelligence and behaviors are impacted by genes but it's so small that it almost doesn't matter is my point

 

[based_meme]

ik that genes play a role, but this role is almost negligible.

IQ is between 50-80% heritable.

 

[DarkStar]

IQ is between 50-80% heritable.

Correct:

Early twin studies of adult individuals have found a heritability of IQ between 57% and 73%,[7] with some recent studies showing heritability for IQ as high as 80%.[8]

Heritability of IQ - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

And 80% is shocking tbh, I consider myself a 50-50 on this, with half of IQ being genetic the others being environmental, though I am aware that at a young age you are more susceptible to environmental factors.

ik that genes play a role, but this role is almost negligible.

See above, most modern scientists would disagree with that statement

lets start with iq. you said previously somewhere that races have an iq "ceiling" aka maximum potential of intelligence.

Yes, that is correct

I partially believe that, due to what was shared here:

Rushton and Jensen [9] called for modern genetic studies to test the hereditarian model. They predicted that “for those Black individuals who possess more White genes, their physical, behavioral, and other characteristics will approach those of Whites” ([9], p. 262). In the present study, we confirmed that this was the case for general cognitive ability. Moreover, we showed that the association between European ancestry and g was substantially mediated by eduPGS rather than skin color PGS. These results provide support for a hereditarian model.

We found that the eduPGS with the highest validity for g in both the African- and European-American samples was the MTAG_EA_10K set. Although the validity in the African-American sample was approximately half of that in the European-American sample (rAA = 0.1115; rEA = 0.2269), the relations were statistically significant in both populations (p < 0.0001). As with Piffer [111] we found large African-/European-American differences in these eduPGS (d = 1.89). Using the beta in the African-American sample and controlling for the effect of European ancestry (B = 0.124; Model 1b; Table 10), we estimate that the known eduPGS can naïvely explain as much as 20%–25% of the African-/European-American intelligence gap.
Removing variants with low MAF in African 1000 Genomes lineages had little effect on the validity of MTAG_10K eduPGS among African and European-Americans. Thus, contrary to some arguments, European-specific alleles do not seem to be biasing prediction with eduPGS. Our results corroborate those of Piffer [111] who found a strong ecological correlation between MTAG-derived SNPs and population IQ (r = 0.86)

https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8611/1/1/34

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354766492_Genetic_Ancestry_and_General_Cognitive_Ability_in_a_Sample_of_American_Youths

Essentially, these found that Blacks with more White ancestry tended to perform better cognitively based on those studies above.

They also found certain MTAG-derived SNPs correlate strongly with IQ.

even if thats true, the differences in iq between whites and non-whites could be because whites are more likely to reach their ceiling as they live in 1st world countries and are wealthier on average.

I've never denied education & the such don't play a role, for the 10'000th time.

you can just say "but their 1st/3rd worldness is a byproduct of their iq"

Never said it was the full case, you're putting words in my mouth now, I said it's part of the case

Look at tons of SEA countries or China, all were colonized and/or had influence on them & now are growing insanely.

The argument myself & others are making, is that due to these races having been genetically complete in these regions & then evolving over time to it, and thus having certain alleles.

"The colder the winter temperatures and the more northerly the environment, the higher were the IQs that evolved. In corroboration of this thesis, Templer & Arikawa (2006) have reported a correlation across 129 nations of .66 between national IQs and low winter temperatures"

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222557129_Temperature_skin_color_per_capita_income_and_IQ_An_international_perspective#:~:text=The%20colder%20the%20winter%20temperatures,IQs%20and%20low%20winter%20temperatures

Also, this is how IQ tests are done:

." In many studies conducted in Kenya and other African countries, the Raven’s Progressive Matrices and the Raven’s Colored Progressive Matrices are used to measure IQs. The RCPM is a culturally unbiased test comprising mostly of shapes meant to measure spatial and reasoning ability. Unlike the verbal tests, these tests are highly g-loaded and exert significant demands on the examinees’ cognitive faculties"


View: https://zinahissa.medium.com/are-iq-tests-biased-against-africans-2e1bfd4a8b63

when whites have been conquering the world non-stop preventing a lot of progress in other countries, and still do so today using global neoliberal capitalism.

You amounting the argument to this fully would be the same as me amounting it all to genetics. Again, never denied the role of environment but firstly, Whites actually helped many countries progress industrially under colonialism, though ofc I don't deny various mistreatment did occur.

Also, you seem to imply it is all Whites benefiting from Neo-liberal capitalism, when these countries do not work in favor of Whites aka the working-middle class ones, richfags are different.

if every non-white country didn't face intervention by western forces then youd have a point. but we know thats not true

China? They seem to be holding just fine & are now challenging the US, so they haven't faced much intervention. I even admitted to @Made in Heaven & some other Sands here that we fucked up in Iraq, Syria, etc. and those places would be well off.

and now when it comes to violence, blacks are disproportionately more violent not only because they're poor, but also their thug culture.

Yet how did this culture manifest itself? I'm aware, wherever poverty is present crime can grow(Irish mob, Italian mafia, etc) but the thing is, it seems to be

I'm sure genes might play a role here,

They do, and it is ofc noticeable & somewhat significant. As I've explained, we need to just apply Occam's razor. Sure, it is all valid to say that the environment does play a role, but then how can we also say genetics play a role in helping develop that of looks & possibly diseases & the heritability of various mental issues, and then somehow say that race(aka appearance defined by genes) somehow doesn't matter at all?

but there are blacks in other countries that behave just as normally as the native population since they're completely removed from thug life.

LatAm? That doesn't count, and Blacks in the UK are quite similar to the ones in the US

their thug culture is a result of their initial poverty, not because of genes.

As explained:

And why does their culture encourage it? Because of their genes. Genes manifest themselves in complex human interactions, which take various forms.

.

This.

Here's something interesting:

View attachment 1415474

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2009.1650

View: https://andreashofer72.medium.com/the-evolutionary-psychology-of-human-creativity-a1d7b3d2643d

my proof is that hispanics, other non-whites, and rednecks behave very similarly to blacks despite being a different race.

Hispanics are a poor group to measure, since it's an identity, unless you meant Mestizo, and many are mixed with black

Also:

Most dangerous cities in the world 2024 | Statista

The most dangerous cities in the world are found in Mexico. Colima tops the list.

www.statista.com

Hispanics are a mixed race, meaning genetic recombination screws them up.

As for Rednecks, I've been around tons, most are low-IQ & are not exactly smart people, but I never had an issue with one aside from their loudmouths. Most I knew were hard working, blue collar folks.

the thing they have in common is being poor. rednecks have lower crime rates because they tend to hang out in rural areas away from civilization, unlike the other poor non-whites

There is still crime in those, what makes you think otherwise? And can you at least show something to prove this?

the only actual significant biological differences between races are:
-phenotypes
-chances of getting diseases (like blacks being more likely to get sickle cell)

Incorrect:

Different level of population differentiation among human genes - BMC Ecology and Evolution

Background During the colonization of the world, after dispersal out of African, modern humans encountered changeable environments and substantial phenotypic variations that involve diverse behaviors, lifestyles and cultures, were generated among the different modern human populations. Results...

bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com

Basically tons of things related to neurological development differs by population.

I think thats literally it.

If it could impact stuff related to disease, which ofc ties into genes related to SNPs & the such, then how could it not possibly impact other areas of your biology related to such?

But for just phenotype(appearance) alone yes, that would be valid.

others such as intelligence and behaviors are impacted by genes but it's so small that it almost doesn't matter is my point

I disagree, for reasons explained above

 

[SIR ETHNICCEL]

Saying that certain races are more violent than others because of genetics is a myth.

i bet you think communism is the best political system

 

[Logic55]

i bet you think communism is the best political system

No. I don't like communism

 

[Azaylias]

Saying that certain races are more violent than others because of genetics is a myth.

prefrontal cortex

 

[fullofchagrin]

Saying that certain races are more violent than others because of genetics is a myth.

 

[fullofchagrin]

Culture is a byproduct of race

this might be true, it is proven that people of different races who grow up under the same conditions turn out the same, but what you say might still be true

 

[fullofchagrin]

They can be, look at Mongols, Turkics, Japan in WWII, even how the CCP is with it's Mudslime population(based)

 

[Keulut]

Blacks are vile creatures with a low temper and impulse control.

 

[InternalJizzz]

Nah I'm not gay

what you said is BS. every other race of people statistically doesn’t commit the same amount of crime as blacks do. there’s a direct correlation between IQ and crime. and 30% of thier DNA is so foreign it’s unseen in other races

 

[InternalJizzz]

Asians have high IQ because of culture.

you are probably one of the most delusional people i’ve ever met. confront reality and stop trying to lie and gaslight yourself fr.

 

[Failed Pullout]

Saying that certain races are more violent than others because of genetics is a myth.

Saying that certain races is more or less (insert whatever) because of genetics isn't a myth at all. If you don't believe in genetic determinism than you are really denying Inceldom as well.

 

[Failed Pullout]

 

[Ibrahim997]

Culture is a byproduct of race

And vicverca

 

[Logic55]

you are probably one of the most delusional people i’ve ever met. confront reality and stop trying to lie and gaslight yourself fr.

So far, I don't see any scientific evidence that Asians are high IQ because of their DNA. I'm not delusional for being suspicious of race realism.

 

[Logic55]

If you don't believe in genetic determinism than you are really denying Inceldom as well.

Genetics determines your physical appearance but not your IQ. Theres a difference.

 

[Logic55]

there’s a direct correlation between IQ and crime

This is due to socioeconomic factors.

 

[blackpillednigga]

If you don't believe in genetic determinism than you are really denying Inceldom as well.

the blackpill has nothing to do with racial determinism and Im tired of SFcels shoehorning their ideology onto inceldom

blackpill: the idea that the way society treats you is based on your genes. racial determinism: the idea that your race predetermines everything including your iq, behavior, and how much you can ascend. the differences: the blackpill is about how society unfairly treats you based on genes, and...

incels.is