Being high IQ is a little boring

[Diddy]

ur probably mentally challenged

 

[BigSadnes765]

I tried to use reddit

So what did you said about high IQ, again?

 

[Diocel]

OP is not a smart fella, he’s a fart smella

based little jokester

 

[kek1]

Reddit is the 80 iq cesspool of mentally disabled normies

 

[kek1]

To all the redditors reading this, the best cure for low iq is jumping off a cliff

 

[ubermensch666]

Yes i know a lot of ultra high iq people who despise the Internet discussion places because it's always a cesspool of mentally disabled normie retards. It's basically impossible to do any high iq stuff in the Internet ironically. Ultra high iq people communicate in private and not on public Internet.

You'r right. I deleted my account. That place is so stupid that i cant stay for 1 day

 

[kek1]

You'r right. I deleted my account. That place is so stupid that i cant stay for 1 day

If you stayed in Reddit they would just sabotage you and bully you for being smarter than them, they're insecure retards

 

[ubermensch666]

If you stayed in Reddit they would just sabotage you and bully you for being smarter than them, they're insecure retards

Yes, have some people like them on this forum too.

 

[kek1]

Yes, have some people like them on this forum too.

Yeah that's why i don't post about iq anymore

 

[Puppeter]

Got that off some random 10 question quiz on Google

You likely have the intellectual capacity equal to that of a predatory bird, like say a raven or a crow

No such thing as iq test lol idk why normies feel special

 

[Transcended Trucel]

u aren't high IQ until you have some proof to show us. If u got PhD in some high IQ physics shit, got job @faang or HFT trading firm, become NASA or DARPA researcher. Then yes you are high IQ. But till then don't dare to claim being high IQ.

 

[Darth_Homosexualis]

First, i have nothing to do all day (i finish school last year) and i cant use 95% of internet because i think this is so stupid
I tried to use reddit, i enter in some sub's about things i'm intereast like philosophy, literature, religion and mental issues, but they'r midwit af
100-200 years ago this things was for elit, not for plebe discuss
I cant stay around these people whitout despise them
One example, they love nietzsche and "muhh god is dead" but simply ignore 95% of his philosophy, who is basically a social darwinism, they'r much dumb to understand this quote:
"What is good?—Whatever augments the feeling of power, the will to power, power itself, in man.
What is evil?—Whatever springs from weakness.
What is happiness?—The feeling that power increases—that resistance is overcome.
Not contentment, but more power; not peace at any price, but war; not virtue, but efficiency (virtue in the Renaissance sense, virtu, virtue free of moral acid).
The weak and the botched shall perish: first principle of our charity. And one should help them to it.
What is more harmful than any vice?—Practical sympathy for the botched and the weak—Christianity...."

Intellect is a burden insomuch as it gives you insight into the alarming ignorance and obtuseness of your fellow homosapiens, whose notion of culture in the contemporary world is an abomination compared with that which preceded it, both aesthetically and morally. That being said, in modern society, where your earning capacity correlates very strongly with certain aptitudes that can only be acquired if you are predisposed to master them, there is a strong connection between success as measured by conventional metrics (income, status, educational attainment, etc.) and intelligence.

 

[Darth_Homosexualis]

u aren't high IQ until you have some proof to show us. If u got PhD in some high IQ physics shit, got job @faang or HFT trading firm, become NASA or DARPA researcher. Then yes you are high IQ. But till then don't dare to claim being high IQ.

Jobmaxxing or educationmaxxing are objective indicia of intellectual capacity whereas merely asserting it as fact on the basis reading comprehension or analytical aptitude is subjective and as such, a more dubious measure.

 

[ubermensch666]

Jobmaxxing or educationmaxxing are objective indicia of intellectual capacity whereas merely asserting it as fact on the basis reading comprehension or analytical aptitude is subjective and as such, a more dubious measure.

IQ is physiological characteristic, you born with this.

 

[TheProphetMuscle]

ur probably dead average

 

[Darth_Homosexualis]

IQ is physiological characteristic, you born with this.

I'm not contesting that; what I'm saying is that relying on your own manifest ability to engage in activities which you ascribe great intellectual value to is an exercise in subjective analysis whereas, achieving recognition in domains which are universally acknowledged to require a high intellectual aptitude as a prerequisite is an objective analysis. Also see my post above for ruminations on your initial dilemma.

 

[Zettacel]

Welcome to Incels.is, traveller. We can talk about everything here, discuss everything.. hope you will have a good experience here!

Thank you very much bro, im enjoyng the experience

 

[war_with_myself]

the real smart imo are thoze who master skillzz

 

[GriffithIsInnocent]

Average retard after they figure out the derivative of x. Thoughts @Fallenleaves ?

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

Average Reddit user after they figure out out the derivative of x. Thoughts @Fallenleaves ?

We'll start later today, then.

 

[Fallenleaves]

Average Reddit user after they figure out out the derivative of x. Thoughts @Fallenleaves ?

Not much to say

 

[GriffithIsInnocent]

Not much to say

Based

 

[GriffithIsInnocent]

We'll start later today, then.

Great, thank you!

 

[Fallenleaves]

Based

There's nothing left to say

 

[Zettacel]

IQ is physiological characteristic, you born with this.

IMO, it isn't immutable. IQ is a measurement, so it depends on the indicators used to determine it. IQ indicators (brain horsepower, memory, problem-solving ability, concept assimilation capacity, etc.) can be developed and improved by a person, so IQ can consequently be increased.

It is important to remember that IQ, being a measurement, is not an intelligible object in the universe. for example, we know how much a pound weighs or how much a foot measures, and we use these measurements for many things, but they are not themselves tangible objects. That is, measures depend on the indicators used to define them, they are not properly intelligible objects.

Pls, let me know if i haven't been clear. /Google Translate used

 

[DenHaag]

OP is not a smart fella, he’s a fart smella

Lmao

 

[nohope.]

First, i have nothing to do all day (i finish school last year) and i cant use 95% of internet because i think this is so stupid
I tried to use reddit, i enter in some sub's about things i'm intereast like philosophy, literature, religion and mental issues, but they'r midwit af
100-200 years ago this things was for elit, not for plebe discuss
I cant stay around these people whitout despise them
One example, they love nietzsche and "muhh god is dead" but simply ignore 95% of his philosophy, who is basically a social darwinism, they'r much dumb to understand this quote:
"What is good?—Whatever augments the feeling of power, the will to power, power itself, in man.
What is evil?—Whatever springs from weakness.
What is happiness?—The feeling that power increases—that resistance is overcome.
Not contentment, but more power; not peace at any price, but war; not virtue, but efficiency (virtue in the Renaissance sense, virtu, virtue free of moral acid).
The weak and the botched shall perish: first principle of our charity. And one should help them to it.
What is more harmful than any vice?—Practical sympathy for the botched and the weak—Christianity...."

ur not high iq

 

[etbrute]

Smells midwit. HIGH IQ have found their spaces.

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

Smells midwit. HIGH IQ have found their spaces.

I used to demonstrations on this site and LooksMax.

Those demonstrations stopped some time ago, strangely enough.

 

[wei#3959]

No it ain’t