I read somewhere that having kids above 40 is pretty risky. Which means i have less than 8 years to find a foid and impregnate her. Would be a shame to die without spreading my genetics.
Serious As a guy, whats the highest age at which you can have healthy kids
thirteen, no just joking, but I'm sorry to say this, if she passed her 30's it's over, the probability of the kid be born with autism, down syndrome and soy genes will be way more high, the best age would be 16.
No the guys age not the foids age. Foids should be like 27 max
For the foid? Wat abt the guy.
Oooh I thought OP was talking about the foid age.
But I thought there was no limit for men, I thought we could spread our seeds endless trough all our life span.
I don't think there is a age limit tbh, never heard of this for men only for foids
As long as you can get it up boyo.
It's foids that have a shelf life.
It's foids that have a shelf life.
Thats a myth tbh. Above 40, the chances of having an autistic kid is very high. The quality and motility of sperm go down drastically with age for men. The cutoff i think is close to 36 or 37.
D
For the guy I remember reading it really goes shit at 50. But for eggs every single year the woman is past 34, the chance of down syndrome for the kid goes up like 33%
Not true.
Good. Cunts definitely have a shorter shelf life than men.
My father was 43 & I'm just fine. Duhhhhh.
Based on what? Something 'you read somewhere'? What exactly?
Sperm is weaker and less potent with age and it's harder to impregnate a woman, yes. But that doesn't mean that if you succeed in impregnating a woman, your kids are going to be deformed toad creatures.
I dont know about toad creatures lol. But they might end up mentally fked up if youre like 50 or something.
We're already fucked up mentally haha.
Having retard kids is not going to help tbh.
I see no proof for this old man theory though. History has many examples of old guys having kids and there's no evidence of them being deformed or retarded. If the woman is young and fertile, that's what matters.
Older women do correlate with things like down syndrome.
D
No idea tbh, probably it's similar to what happen with whores so i would say 33
Older women (30+) are at higher risk of having retard kids. But the myth that men can have kids at any age has been shattered by recent studies.
What recent studies mate, that's what I'm not finding is proof of this claim.
I did a brief search on google and only thing I see are a few bullshit normie articles which involve older men copulating with older women, that latter of which we already know are the correlating factor in these issues.
Fertility and the Aging Male
In the United States since 1980, the birth rate in women aged > 35 years has increased by nearly 60%, whereas the birth rate for women aged 20 to 34 years has increased by only 10%. The trend in parenthood at an older age has also been seen in ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
There are other studies that focus on chances of having autistic kids.
The child being housed inside the mother contributes in the majority as to what will come out, food being eaten, the environment, the stress, where the age of a male would factor in I'd imagine is in how much sperm he produces & the copy of himself those sperm hold in their genetic code.
They're a blueprint of your lineage so they're a copy of what you are currently & the less sperm you're generating means the winner that got through out of say 50,000 participants might of come 50th if 300,000 were running.
lol.
Not only less sperm, but sperm of lesser quality and motility. Lesser quality sperm increases chances of genetic defects while lack of motility decreases the chances of fertilization.
I
I'd like to see a study that monitors the average age the parents were of top athletes & models, I bet they tended to be on the lower side of average.
Most definitely. My mom had me when she was 22, my dad was arnd 30. Didnt really help tbh, but the next generation of curry kids are going to be both ugly and retarded.
Its unimaginably over.
around 30 maybe
Not sure, Barron trump, seems to be rather healthy. Yet his dad was already in his late 60's when he had them. I don't think men, have to worry about age, as much as women. When it comes to having kids.
Didn't they put him on all kinds of vitamin & nutrition supplements & how old was his mother? The health of someone with Trump's wealth has to have its perks in regards to health options.
We can but there are risks. Roasties can have kids technically at age 40 but that doesn’t mean there won’t be problems.
Dude, this literally proves what I just said lol.Fertility and the Aging Male
In the United States since 1980, the birth rate in women aged > 35 years has increased by nearly 60%, whereas the birth rate for women aged 20 to 34 years has increased by only 10%. The trend in parenthood at an older age has also been seen in ...
There are other studies that focus on chances of having autistic kids.
"It is difficult to demonstrate the effects that DNA fragmentation and paternal age have on genetic disorders"
"Specifically, there was no link between paternal age and Down syndrome, Klinefelter syndrome, Turner syndrome, XYY syndrome, Apert syndrome (FGFR2 mutation), or sex ratio.57 There is ongoing debate in the literature regarding the contribution of paternal age to trisomies in the offspring. A study of 3419 offspring with trisomies showed a paternal age effect only (emphasis mine) when the maternal age was ≥ 35 years. This effect was strongest when maternal age was > 40 years. (emphasis mine)"
Like I said, it's the foid's age that matters with regard to the topic you raised.
The majority of this article (from a paternal standpoint) has to do with the quality and potency of semen, which does naturally wane with age, not old guys fucking and having retarded children, of which there is no correlation here. The only thing there is a correlation between older men and developmental issues, is with respect to miscarriages per the Singh study.
Fair point, actually. Sure him being born into a billionairs family, definitly helped. Still i don't think men, have to worry as much about it as women. Yet i definitly wouldn't recommend any men, to have kids past the age of 50. Not necessarily because of health issues, but also because at this age, you probably won't be able to enjoy, your kids to the same extend, a men in his 30's or even 40's would be able to.
This article specifically talks about sperm deterioration with age in men. As far as autism, there have been several studies. Check below article and the studies referenced.
Father’s advanced age feeds autism risk
Are older fathers more likely to have children with autism? A series of epidemiological studies is giving credence to the idea, suggesting that, with age, sperm may accumulate damage that increases…
www.spectrumnews.org
He ain't playing no catch in the backyard for sure.
No doubt on the sperm part. That said, nothing against you at all here, but I'm not buying the studies referenced by the author with relation to autism upon reading them. Reichenberg admits he didn't conduct deep correlation analysis because of sample size limitations and Croen's methodology had gaping holes in it. Even despite that fact, the latter concludes that parental age "is still a relatively small contributor" to autism. In fairness, the research in this area appears to be all over the board, from people claiming that data "suggests" the two factors are related, to those who take a more balanced statistical approach who say there is no independent relationship between paternal age and autism.This article specifically talks about sperm deterioration with age in men. As far as autism, there have been several studies. Check below article and the studies referenced.
Father’s advanced age feeds autism risk
Are older fathers more likely to have children with autism? A series of epidemiological studies is giving credence to the idea, suggesting that, with age, sperm may accumulate damage that increases…
Even assuming that the evidence which suggests there is a higher rate of autism prevalence in older fathers is correct, that evidence which does exist is laughable in terms of drawing any meaningful conclusions from it. While Spectrum News puts out the gaudy headline that "paternal age ups the rate of autism," they reference data from Jonsson, which shows a 1.50% chance of males in their 20's having an autistic baby vs. 1.58% for those in their 40's. That is not a statistically significant difference. (And keep in mind this statistic is for men in their 40's paired with a woman also in her 40's). Such paltry results aren't even worthy of funding for further research tbh. They certainly aren't anything someone in their 40's should consider problematic for even one second when banging a girl.
Though 40 is awhile away, if some hot girl temporarily loses her vision and wants bang me at that age, it won't be on mine, that's for sure.
I find the lack of appreciation for epigenetics alarming in the studies these autism groups are doing. It seems like they're just trying to pin matters, the hypothetical causes of which aren't even well developed in socially-acceptable circles, onto the most lazy, lowest common denominator factors imaginable. And not surprisingly, it seems some are attempting to pin causation on men (i.e. male age) whilst ignoring other potential factors in the human ecosystem (chemical, environmental, etc.).
I could go on, but since this isn't a science forum, I'll leave it there.
That only applies to women... JFL men have almost unlimted time before having kids.
This
Even if you have healthy kids in your 40s, will you have the energy to make enough money and raise them?
It's all fucking pointless. Your sons will need god tier genes even have a half shot at a decent life in the next 20 years.
It's all fucking pointless. Your sons will need god tier genes even have a half shot at a decent life in the next 20 years.
The male can be whatever age. This issue is that the female should be 30 and below. It is possible to ascend as an 80 year old man with an 18 year old foid.
No ur not, ur posting here with us
Like almost 80 if you are Mick Jagger.
For normal people, not sure. Also MJ if he had no musical talent and was born in the modern era would have been incel. He was an ugly dude when he was younger
For normal people, not sure. Also MJ if he had no musical talent and was born in the modern era would have been incel. He was an ugly dude when he was younger
40 is risky, but professional sperm screen can prevent some common issues. My advice is that if you have the money, use a surrogate.
Last edited:
It was the opposite trying to be implied but text doesn't convey that very well & I guess not all cultures have sarcasm.
The other option is to freeze my sperm now. Not sure if thats actually viable though.
This is why you are 7 feet tall.
I wouldn't. If frozen eggs are any indication, the success rate is 25%. What is stopping you right now from going the surrogate route?
My mom had me when she was 30 and I turned out fine
How would that work ?
Ya. Why else would you be posting here lol.
Not sure if height is correlated with parental age, although lot more studies have to be done to establish this.
Last edited:
B
I think you're right, OP. From what I recall, the number is in fact 40. After that age, your children will be less healthy overall, but the risk isn't as high as it is for women who have kids in their mid 30s.
Surrogacy? Two major steps: find a good donor egg from a Stacy of your preferred race. Going rate is about $6k per dozen. Second step is to get in touch with a donor agency. Depending on where you live, it may be cheaper to go overseas. I would have at least $50k set aside before I went down this path. Surrogates in Ukraine, Russia or SEA run about $30k to $50k. South America and Africa idk. Remember, any foid can be the surrogate, all that matters is that she is healthy and stays healthy during the pregnancy.
I would research it if I were you so you get an idea of how the process goes. I think it'll grow in popularity soon thanks to all the sub-6 men not wanting to settle with used goods.
Tbh i dont know if i want kids that badly. If i cant get a foid by the time iam 40, id prolly just throw in the towel and give up on trying.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
