Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Aryanism.net opinions about human beauty

  • Thread starter Cybersex is our hope
  • Start date
Cybersex is our hope

Cybersex is our hope

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 4, 2018
Posts
7,627
They have this idea that aryanism is about skull shape and craniometry and not colours or pigmentation (absolutely true) but then, since they associate this traits with the Neolithic farmers opposed to Mesolithic hunter-gatherers, they go further saying that every farmer society from the past/Neolithic, be it European, Asian or African is classifiable as aryan with aryan looking individuals and people.

What do you think about that?
http://aryanism.net/culture/aesthetics/human-beauty/
 
Article said that make up makes an aryan face look worse instantly. Explains a lot, when I think about it.
they go further saying that every farmer society from the past/Neolithic, be it European, Asian or African is classifiable as aryan
They shouldn‘t be called aryan. some of them just happened to have european/nordic facial bone features, which is good, but they‘re still ethnic
 
Article said that make up makes an aryan face look worse instantly. Explains a lot, when I think about it.

They shouldn‘t be called aryan. some of them just happened to have european/nordic facial bone features, which is good, but they‘re still ethnic


The point is that they suggest that those facial features aren't inherently European but typical of every descendant of Neolithic people (indo-aryans). They say that putting someone in the same race just for skin pigmentation is like saying that a black pug has more in common with a black Rottweiler than it has with a white pug
 
Never thought I'd have such an interesting time skimming through an article from a seemingly pro-nazi website
 
A particular example highlighting the importance of balance between the body parts is the trait commonly known as Morton’s Toe, in which the second toe is slightly more prominent than the big toe. While this is a racial ideal of human beauty consistently portrayed in the visual arts

This is probably the only ideal trait that I possess
 
That article makes no sense. He's actually arguing that greater forehead amplitude is a GOOD THING. ie. A bulbous forehead.

Maybe for women since it looks neotenous. Not for men.

He obviously has no idea what he's talking about.
 
They have this idea that aryanism is about skull shape and craniometry and not colours or pigmentation (absolutely true) but then, since they associate this traits with the Neolithic farmers opposed to Mesolithic hunter-gatherers, they go further saying that every farmer society from the past/Neolithic, be it European, Asian or African is classifiable as aryan with aryan looking individuals and people.

What do you think about that?
http://aryanism.net/culture/aesthetics/human-beauty/
LMAO i've seen that shit before , i used to be NS and it's definitely jewish-shilling , only Europoids can be Aryan
A
 
Most retarded website I've ever seen. On par with timecube.
 
This indo-aryan connection makes no sense. This branch is historically found in the near east and south asia, at 2 Millennium BC. Also, farmer cultures from Europe were pre-indoeuropean. Some linguistically known remnants of these groups may be the etruscans, cypro-minoans and basques.
 
This website is a joke. Their blog is written by a leftie mangina liberal who defends mass immigration and american BLM but happens to hate jews.
 
I'm of the same opinion. Blacks who look indo-European have often caucasoid DNA for various reasons (afro-Americans, Somali etc)
This indo-aryan connection makes no sense. This branch is historically found in the near east and south asia, at 2 Millennium BC. Also, farmer cultures from Europe were pre-indoeuropean. Some linguistically known remnants of these groups may be the etruscans, cypro-minoans and basques.
Yep but they say every single agricultural society shares the same face traits because they needed to be more neotenous in order to bond better in a farming society
 

Similar threads

Flagellum_Dei
Replies
45
Views
3K
Genetics_subhuman
Genetics_subhuman
Chudpreet
Replies
143
Views
2K
DarkStar
DarkStar
Flagellum_Dei
Replies
78
Views
3K
Flagellum_Dei
Flagellum_Dei
Eremetic
Replies
3
Views
618
AntisocialNihilist
AntisocialNihilist

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top