Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment Are You an Efilist?

Title


  • Total voters
    16
DreamCoper

DreamCoper

"Cope in the deep, or drown in it"
★★★★
Joined
Mar 11, 2025
Posts
2,319
Online time
16m 46s
Efilism = The belief that sentient life is bad and leads to net suffering and should be eradicated.
 
Yes, but only in a theoretical sense.
 
No, that's evil and stupid. I like many things about life
 
I do not understand how any incel with an iq above 90 cannot realize it
 
Reddit ideology
 
Efilism = The belief that sentient life is bad and leads to net suffering and should be eradicated.
i'm not that utilitarian + collectivist.

Also if i'm suffering so much I can always kick bucket.
But I dont care about the suffering of normies and foids. only about myself and fellow incels
 
I agree with their perspective on life since it's logical but I only care about myself. I don't care what happens to others.

Life is brutal and creates pointless suffering for the unfortunate, those who deny it are not seeing the bigger picture. This is the reason why I sometimes feel out of place here too and I hesitated before I joined the forum.

Life eats itself, evolves and replicates in brutal ways, there is nothing else beyond that goal.
 
Last edited:
Life should be a dream
 
elaborate?
I mean that I agree with the core reasoning, which is that sentient life inherently involves unavoidable suffering and that non-existence would, in principle, prevent it, in the usual proposition:

---

[1] the presence of suffering is harmful.

[2] the absence of pleasure isn't.

[3] the absence of anything is neutral—neither good, nor bad.

[4] therefore, neutrality is preferable over the possibility of suffering, for there is nothing inherently harmful about nonexistence.

---

But I don’t actively advocate for ending life in practice. My stance is more a philosophical conclusion than a call to immediate action, because it isn't pragmatic, and it often leads to half-measures that bring more suffering than good to living beings (this includes many of the measures for preventing life).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top