Are men more evolved than women?

[mericks]

If you're on this forum you're no doubt aware of the statistic that scientists believe that historically 80% of women reproduce vs only 40% of men.

I'd like to submit that this means males are under more evolutionary pressure than females, which causes undesirable traits to be eliminated faster as well as the faster emergence of new traits which are desirable. Thus it could be said that men are more evolved.

The counterargument to this would probably be that most of the human genome is gender neutral and therefore most traits would evolve at the same rate between both males and females. IDK.

I'm not an expert on any of this so I could easily be wrong. I was just thinking about how many things there are that can ruin your chances as a man but wouldn't even matter if you're a woman when it occurred to me that this means there is a disparity in how much evolutionary pressure males are under compared to females.

 

[NoLooksNoLife]

Who else high af rn?

 

[decembrist_kirillov]

women are holes thats all

 

[mericks]

Who else high af rn?

Yeah pretty much. Wish i could get drunk right now, but I'm on medication that reacts badly with alcohol so I'm forced to contemplate all my dumb ideas completely sober.

 

[wereq]

I'd like to submit that this means males are under more evolutionary pressure than females, which causes undesirable traits to be eliminated faster as well as the faster emergence of new traits which are desirable. Thus it could be said that men are more evolved.

correct

 

[Man]

Are men more evolved than women?​

abso-fucking-lutely
Name one metric where women exceed men that isn't related to having sex or being given something.

6 year old boy > Fully developed woman
JFL

 

[LesscoBlob]

If you're on this forum you're no doubt aware of the statistic that scientists believe that historically 80% of women reproduce vs only 40% of men.

That is true, however the main reason as to why most men didn't reproduce has to do with the fact that a massive percentage of men also died in wars.

I'd like to submit that this means males are under more evolutionary pressure than females, which causes undesirable traits to be eliminated faster as well as the faster emergence of new traits which are desirable. Thus it could be said that men are more evolved.

While this would result in more evolved men (and even women as we inherit both of our parents' genes) theoretically, this doesn't happen in practise, because basically all women reproduce, so they get to pass on their genes no matter how bad they are. And since, we inherit both of our parents' genes, men become incels again.

The counterargument to this would probably be that most of the human genome is gender neutral and therefore most traits would evolve at the same rate between both males and females. IDK.

Exactly. Also, the trais that are most attractive to women have nothing to do with evolutionary fitess. "Nice eyes" and a "sharp jawline" aren't evolutionarily advantageous. I suppose you could make the arguement for height, but face is the most important part and its attractiveness has zero evolutionary advantages.

I'm not an expert on any of this so I could easily be wrong. I was just thinking about how many things there are that can ruin your chances as a man but wouldn't even matter if you're a woman when it occurred to me that this means there is a disparity in how much evolutionary pressure males are under compared to females.

There are a lot of things that can destroy you as a man, but they literally don't matter if you're a woman. It should also be said that the reason why men don't reproduce through more "controversial" means (ie. rape is one of the most common ways animals pass on their genes and even genetically weak men are physically stronger than the average woman), but we don't do it due to social norms.
Here's a thread explaining it all.

The Elimination of Average/Below Average Males from the Sexual Market Has Nothing to Do with Natural Selection

I feel overwhelmed by rage whenever I hear anyone make this fucking retarded argument, and the frustrating thing is that its repeated by a wide array of people pushing different ideological agendas. Feminist cunts use it as a way of justifying the mistreatment of males Redpillers use it to...

incels.is

 

[based_meme]

If you're on this forum you're no doubt aware of the statistic that scientists believe that historically 80% of women reproduce vs only 40% of men.

I'd like to submit that this means males are under more evolutionary pressure than females, which causes undesirable traits to be eliminated faster as well as the faster emergence of new traits which are desirable. Thus it could be said that men are more evolved.

The counterargument to this would probably be that most of the human genome is gender neutral and therefore most traits would evolve at the same rate between both males and females. IDK.

I'm not an expert on any of this so I could easily be wrong. I was just thinking about how many things there are that can ruin your chances as a man but wouldn't even matter if you're a woman when it occurred to me that this means there is a disparity in how much evolutionary pressure males are under compared to females.

I'm no expert either, but those evolutionary pressures that select for the males who successfully pass on their genes will be carried over into the following generations. Said differently, it doesn't matter what the DNA of the female is like (good, bad), all that matters is the DNA of the male that is passed on to the next generation, since females are the selectors.

 

[Diddy]

women are holes thats all

 

[Dokes]

Yes but the number of LGBT trannys tranistioning means this stat will be mute soon

 

[MarquisDeSade]

If you're on this forum you're no doubt aware of the statistic that scientists believe that historically 80% of women reproduce vs only 40% of men.

I'd like to submit that this means males are under more evolutionary pressure than females, which causes undesirable traits to be eliminated faster as well as the faster emergence of new traits which are desirable. Thus it could be said that men are more evolved.

The counterargument to this would probably be that most of the human genome is gender neutral and therefore most traits would evolve at the same rate between both males and females. IDK.

I'm not an expert on any of this so I could easily be wrong. I was just thinking about how many things there are that can ruin your chances as a man but wouldn't even matter if you're a woman when it occurred to me that this means there is a disparity in how much evolutionary pressure males are under compared to females.

The same people who make that argument you have to remind them that this is 2023 now, and why are we allowing neanderthal sexual inequality in terms of sexual opportunity permeate in the modern age? Also, none of this is at all sustainable.

 

[DarkStar]

Who else high af rn?

 

[DarkStar]

women are holes thats all

 

[DarkStar]

Men traditionally led society for many generations and it was accepted that women had a duty to fulfill that did not involve leading society; nowadays we do not have this anymore, so men are stagnating.

 

[bigantennaemay1]

Depends on the male. There are idiots, cucks and simps out there, as well as JBW copers here, that could give women a run for their money straight to the bottom of the evolutionary gene pool.

 

[wei#3959]

Depends on the male. There are idiots, cucks and simps out there, as well as JBW copers here, that could give women a run for their money straight to the bottom of the evolutionary gene pool.

 

[wei#3959]

yes depends on the person (water is wet)

 

[bigantennaemay1]

Men traditionally led society for many generations and it was accepted that women had a duty to fulfill that did not involve leading society; nowadays we do not have this anymore, so men are stagnating.

Brutal traditional vs. modern man pill.