Blackpill The Elimination of Average/Below Average Males from the Sexual Market Has Nothing to Do with Natural Selection

[SayanimCel]

I feel overwhelmed by rage whenever I hear anyone make this fucking retarded argument, and the frustrating thing is that its repeated by a wide array of people pushing different ideological agendas.

• Feminist cunts use it as a way of justifying the mistreatment of males
• Redpillers use it to justify their “just do better” BS advice
• Chad worshippers use it to further worship Chad

The definition of natural selection is, “The process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring”

Only this has next to zero application to human males as we are prohibited from using a large percentage of our adaptations to our advantage, due to cucked social norms, police forces, etc.

It’s the equivalent of a lion being unable to hunt food because “lion social norms” dictate that running at full speed after a gazelle is ‘toxic’ and ‘immoral,’ so he can only run at 80% of his full speed, which isn’t enough.

If the human males that women have rejected and mistreated were able to use all their evolutionary adaptations (as is the case for animals existing in a truly natural selection-style environment) they could employ their:

• Greater physical strength, speed, agility, stamina and durability to forcefully pass on their genes (forced snuggles)
• Cunning / tactics / strategy / intellect to amass wealth/power/authority through means which modern society prohibits, e.g. selling drugs
• Networking with other average/below average men to take the resources of Chad, which is common in the animal kingdom (males who are getting shafted by the sexual distribution of their group joining together and defeating the dominant male)

Also, in a truly natural selection-style environment, the “Chads” that pass on their genes (not cos females selected them jfl, but because they took them by force), would possess the genes most adapted for their future offspring to have the best chances of survival

This is not the case today. What about having a NW0 hairline or clear skin is correlated with improved chances of survival? Fucking nothing. It would be one thing if the mistreatment of average/below average men at least led to the selection for traits that are actually useful like intelligence, memory, immune system, etc. but it’s not – its leading to a selection for “nice eyes” and “high cheekbones” jfl which do not benefit the human gene pool whatsoever

The modern sexual marketplace has absolutely nothing to do with natural selection and anybody who says it does is a fucking disingenuous retard

 

[Greyandoldcel]

So, bottom line is natural selection will fuck us over?
Chad and his useless, not including appearance features will cause everything to fuck up.

Sorry, I'm a bit low iq but that's what I mainy got from your spiel.

 

[I.N.C.E.L.S. Boss]

The definition of natural selection is, “The process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring”

Chad is more adapted to an environment that promotes hypergamy.

 

[I want to believe]

Chad is more adapted to an environment that promotes hypergamy.

 

[Deleted member 42691]

I feel overwhelmed by rage whenever I hear anyone make this fucking retarded argument, and the frustrating thing is that its repeated by a wide array of people pushing different ideological agendas.

• Feminist cunts use it as a way of justifying the mistreatment of males
• Redpillers use it to justify their “just do better” BS advice
• Chad worshippers use it to further worship Chad

The definition of natural selection is, “The process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring”

Only this has next to zero application to human males as we are prohibited from using a large percentage of our adaptations to our advantage, due to cucked social norms, police forces, etc.

It’s the equivalent of a lion being unable to hunt food because “lion social norms” dictate that running at full speed after a gazelle is ‘toxic’ and ‘immoral,’ so he can only run at 80% of his full speed, which isn’t enough.

If the human males that women have rejected and mistreated were able to use all their evolutionary adaptations (as is the case for animals existing in a truly natural selection-style environment) they could employ their:

• Greater physical strength, speed, agility, stamina and durability to forcefully pass on their genes (forced snuggles)
• Cunning / tactics / strategy / intellect to amass wealth/power/authority through means which modern society prohibits, e.g. selling drugs
• Networking with other average/below average men to take the resources of Chad, which is common in the animal kingdom (males who are getting shafted by the sexual distribution of their group joining together and defeating the dominant male)

Also, in a truly natural selection-style environment, the “Chads” that pass on their genes (not cos females selected them jfl, but because they took them by force), would possess the genes most adapted for their future offspring to have the best chances of survival

This is not the case today. What about having a NW0 hairline or clear skin is correlated with improved chances of survival? Fucking nothing. It would be one thing if the mistreatment of average/below average men at least led to the selection for traits that are actually useful like intelligence, memory, immune system, etc. but it’s not – its leading to a selection for “nice eyes” and “high cheekbones” jfl which do not benefit the human gene pool whatsoever

The modern sexual marketplace has absolutely nothing to do with natural selection and anybody who says it does is a fucking disingenuous retard

You get it

But muh natural selection, even the weakest of incel could overpower 98% of female around the world.

The reality is that we lived in the worst controlled social engineering ever at the advantage of women.

To keep your lion analogy, it’s like the zebra grew a pair of wings nowadays.

Since the beginning of mankind , we are currently in the best era for female, everything is designed for their desire

 

[I.N.C.E.L.S. Boss]

what do i get ?

 

[nystagmuscel]

To think that we could live like kings if people simply didn’t abide by non-physical, completely made up and arbitrary platitudes

 

[Zhou Chang-Xing]

Human social norms are an environment, we live in a human social environment and the adaptations that would have helped "in the wild" don't benefit us in the Social human environment.


View: https://youtu.be/GTX0xkhbXHU

 

[Mystic]

You get it

But muh natural selection, even the weakest of incel could overpower 98% of female around the world.

The reality is that we lived in the worst controlled social engineering ever at the advantage of women.

To keep your lion analogy, it’s like the zebra grew a pair of wings nowadays.

Since the beginning of mankind , we are currently in the best era for female, everything is designed for their desire

 

[Mystic]

To think that we could live like kings if people simply didn’t abide by non-physical, completely made up and arbitrary platitudes

 

[thehardestpart]

Yeah, I said something along those lines in another thread:

They believe in naturalism when excusing women's degeneracy, but somehow men are expected to be single and not be hateful, somehow work for other men's kids, and somehow not want to hurt/r4p3 random foids on the streets after years of celibacy (in Dark Souls 3: Fire Fades[UWSL]™[/UWSL] Edition), which is completely unnatural

 

[CurrycelRaja]

I feel overwhelmed by rage whenever I hear anyone make this fucking retarded argument, and the frustrating thing is that its repeated by a wide array of people pushing different ideological agendas.

• Feminist cunts use it as a way of justifying the mistreatment of males
• Redpillers use it to justify their “just do better” BS advice
• Chad worshippers use it to further worship Chad

The definition of natural selection is, “The process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring”

Only this has next to zero application to human males as we are prohibited from using a large percentage of our adaptations to our advantage, due to cucked social norms, police forces, etc.

It’s the equivalent of a lion being unable to hunt food because “lion social norms” dictate that running at full speed after a gazelle is ‘toxic’ and ‘immoral,’ so he can only run at 80% of his full speed, which isn’t enough.

If the human males that women have rejected and mistreated were able to use all their evolutionary adaptations (as is the case for animals existing in a truly natural selection-style environment) they could employ their:

• Greater physical strength, speed, agility, stamina and durability to forcefully pass on their genes (forced snuggles)
• Cunning / tactics / strategy / intellect to amass wealth/power/authority through means which modern society prohibits, e.g. selling drugs
• Networking with other average/below average men to take the resources of Chad, which is common in the animal kingdom (males who are getting shafted by the sexual distribution of their group joining together and defeating the dominant male)

Also, in a truly natural selection-style environment, the “Chads” that pass on their genes (not cos females selected them jfl, but because they took them by force), would possess the genes most adapted for their future offspring to have the best chances of survival

This is not the case today. What about having a NW0 hairline or clear skin is correlated with improved chances of survival? Fucking nothing. It would be one thing if the mistreatment of average/below average men at least led to the selection for traits that are actually useful like intelligence, memory, immune system, etc. but it’s not – its leading to a selection for “nice eyes” and “high cheekbones” jfl which do not benefit the human gene pool whatsoever

The modern sexual marketplace has absolutely nothing to do with natural selection and anybody who says it does is a fucking disingenuous retard

Nw0???
New world order hairline?