American-cels, send this paragraph to your congressman under your name. Let's make change happen!

[Deleted member 36776]

It as an anthropological truth widely known that the race of Man is partly polygynous in its instinct. We have historically repressed this by monogamous cultural norms which have become undone in the last few decades. It's become clear that female sexual liberty has meant that female sexual choice will often settle on the same men to the exclusion of other men. Some dudebros will get a rotating harem and effectively block the sexual opportunity of other men. Also, serial monogamy (the shameless practice of which we have also come to allow) is itself is a form of polygyny -- i.e, man getting older but always dating women in their fertile years. In granting these freedoms, we have not thought through whether the new sexual order would need balancing out in some other way. We have not thought out whether under this new sexual regime (in which our daughters summon their Chads and Tyrones on their Tinders and Instagrams) whether keeping prostitution prohibited would in fact come to constitute a harm.

Prostitution was prohibited across the United States in the 1920s to the 1940s when there was a conservative sensibility about sexual relations and society very strongly enforced monogamy. As the culture has changed very much since with regards to marriage (in that women's economic progress has freed them from economic dependency on men) and as we have chosen to sexually liberate our women (in that we allow them to be proud of their various orffices serving as masturbation devices for the aforementioned Cs & Ts) it can be fairly said that the continued prohibition of prostitution can no longer be justified and is harmful to the mental health of the men who lose out as a result of the polygyny which we now allow. Never-minding the howling of social conservatives and aging suburban wives, society should complete the Sexual Revolution and legalize prostitution. It is unconscionable to permit our women to whore out for Chads and Tyrones without also permitting them to whore out for legal tender.

I, (YOUR NAME), ask you (YOUR CONGRESS REPRESENTATIVE/senators/etc) to support a federal bill legalizing prostitution as a matter of human rights and, we add, as to reduce the socio-sexual status of our looksmatched Beckies who, as we write, are getting reamed by Chads who use them as biological sex dolls, thereby not only monopolizing them but also ruining them for us, thereby filling these Beckies with an oppressive haughtiness to which by nature they are not entitled.

Let women have their Tinder.

Let men have their Hookr.

 

[Restart80]

I, (YOUR NAME), ask you (YOUR CONGRESS REPRESENTATIVE/senators/etc) to support a federal bill legalizing prostitution as a matter of human rights and, we add, as to reduce the socio-sexual status of our looksmatched Beckies who, as we write, are getting reamed by Chads who use them as biological sex dolls, thereby not only monopolizing them but also ruining them for us.

This.

Should throw in a request to lower AoC too, with reference to the biological argument that femoids mature faster and their brains stop developing at like 15 anyway.

 

[Words2_live_bye]

Let women have their Tinder.

Let men have their Hookr.

 

[Deleted member 35171]

It's just begun for accelerationcels

Accelerate boys, accelerate

 

[Restart80]

It's just begun for accelerationcels

Accelerate boys, accelerate

Just like my driving instructor recently said: "ACCELERATE, ACCELERATE!"

 

[Deleted member 36776]

This.

Should throw in a request to lower AoC too, with reference to the biological argument that femoids mature faster and their brains stop developing at like 15 anyway.

My defensive take on the age of consent issue:

If women are going to be explicit about their evolutionary desire for taller males then men should be explicit about their preference for teen femoids

Men do not speak of this desire out of decency but the attraction to teen girls is very raw and intense in the average man. His penile blood flow when shown nude pics of teen femoids would be greater than when shown pics of 30 year old roasties. Women prefer taller guys for "evolutionary"...

incels.is

 

[Angry_runt]

I can imagine this kind of thing bringing Democrats and Republicans together while they're laughing and ridiculing us.

 

[Deleted member 36776]

Let's look at the "New Yorker" article by on incels by that roastie.

The Rage of the Incels


Look at this passage:

Several distinct cultural changes have created a situation in which many men who hate women do not have the access to women’s bodies that they would have had in an earlier era. The sexual revolution urged women to seek liberation. The self-esteem movement taught women that they were valuable beyond what convention might dictate. The rise of mainstream feminism gave women certainty and company in these convictions. And the Internet-enabled efficiency of today’s sexual marketplace allowed people to find potential sexual partners with a minimum of barriers and restraints. Most American women now grow up understanding that they can and should choose who they want to have sex with.

You are told a structural situation has created many men who hate women not getting access to women's bodies blah blah.

She has to frame it as "many men who hate women" because she herself in terms of socio-sexual status has benefited from the double whammy of allowing women to share attractive men while not permitting legal prostitution. If she acknowledges that the incels created by this structural issue are not monsters then she would have to be open to a remedy (legal prostitution) harmful to her own sexual interests and status. Awareness of this makes the author sound angry and afraid. "Whatever is done for the incels is going to come at my expense and I resent this despite my lip service about tolerating sex work" is the tone of the article. It's truly like the sort of thing someone just called out on their privileges for the first time would write.

"Progressivism" and liberals are disgustingly hostile to incels because we're being asked to pay the price of the "progress" inherent in roasties like our yenta author here chasing Chad cock when young and counting on enough desperate betas willing to wife them up when their wombs are nearly expired. Yea Jill, women are free to select their sexual partners as freely as possible (which you celebrate) but their hypergamy gives them a tendency to share attractive men in quasi-polygnous arrangements. The variance in sexual success between any two young men has increased because we are mammals and women will share attractive men when we remove cultural restraints on their animal sexual nature. Fixing this imbalance will indeed require deflating the worth of the sexual availability of roasties like you. You will have the right to whore around for personal pleasure. You will also have the right to whore around for money. Why resent the increase of sexual liberty?

Josh Hawley 2024