Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill All women are socialists... unless we are talking about the SEX MARKET

zombie

zombie

Rotting until I am actually dead
-
Joined
Feb 2, 2019
Posts
1,179
All women love socialism, they want all resources to be evenly distributed, to never have to work or any other egalitarian bullshit that socialists promise.

However, when the subject is sexual freedom, women couldn't care less about equality or helping the "poor", they want the most freedom as they possibly can. They want the most capitalist society possible.

They don't give a shit if 99% of sex are had by 1% of men, to them freedom all of a sudden becomes a sacred deity to be worshiped, but only for having sex and using drugs.

Funny how that works.
 
high IQ

in fact, this can be seen in Commie countries

where foids were given a lot of (sexual) freedom

it was so bad that it went all the way to modern times, which is why modern slavic women are whores and all mainland chinknoodlewhores are gold diggers

exp.
 
they apply Rothbardian economics in their pussies
 
They also enjoy spouting off about natural selection and eugenics when it's convenient, which is hilarious and really highlights what simpletons they are.
 
They also enjoy spouting off about natural selection and eugenics when it's convenient, which is hilarious and really highlights what simpletons they are.

Every time some hole start talking about "good genes" and "natural selection" I ask the whore how many kids they have.

They always get BTFO because they never have any (women with kids don't have time to debate on the internet) so I just make the logical conclusion that they are as much of a dead end as any incel. They get pissed and start their bullshit rationalizations about how they could have them anytime they wanted to. Yeah bitch but they won't because they like being Chad's disposable sexdolls more than being mothers.
 
There is a movie about a Russian sniper during WW2. I think, I'm not sure though, that it's in this movie that there is a great black pill.

One character is jealous of the affection his love interest has for an other guy. He then reflects on how communism can not solve all inequalities, because some people are just born with natural advantages in life, in that case looks and talent (I think he was jealous of the sniper), and communism can't do shit about that. In the movie the character was a fervent communist but jealousy made him doubt his political beliefs.

In fact, arguably communism makes things even worse, because if people can't be more economically successful than others, then the only thing people can stand out for to attract women, is genetics, basically.
 
There is a movie about a Russian sniper during WW2. I think, I'm not sure though, that it's in this movie that there is a great black pill.

One character is jealous of the affection his love interest has for an other guy. He then reflects on how communism can not solve all inequalities, because some people are just born with natural advantages on life, in that case looks and talent (I think he was jealous of the sniper), and communism can't do shit about that.

In fact, arguably communism makes things even worse, because if people can't be more economically successful than others, then the only thing people can stand out for to attract women, is genetics, basically.

Controlling sex is normally related with religion which is banned in communist dystopias, so they are mostly liberal when it comes to sex, which makes it just another way that communism ideologies fail in the long run because of the birthrates plummeting.
 
They also enjoy spouting off about natural selection and eugenics when it's convenient, which is hilarious and really highlights what simpletons they are.

First of, it's sexual selection, not natural selection.

Second, we've already debunked this idea in other threads, but I guess it will keep popping out because women don't care about making sense, they care about protecting their ass.

 
There is a movie about a Russian sniper during WW2. I think, I'm not sure though, that it's in this movie that there is a great black pill.

One character is jealous of the affection his love interest has for an other guy. He then reflects on how communism can not solve all inequalities, because some people are just born with natural advantages in life, in that case looks and talent (I think he was jealous of the sniper), and communism can't do shit about that. In the movie the character was a fervent communist but jealousy made him doubt his political beliefs.

In fact, arguably communism makes things even worse, because if people can't be more economically successful than others, then the only thing people can stand out for to attract women, is genetics, basically.
Russia was a free real estate for men after 30 million of them died in both world wars. It is the one of rare instances where women had to compete over any man they saw cause the country was closed for foreignars and there were so little of young men left.
 
Russia was a free real estate for men after 30 million of them died in both world wars. It is the one of rare instances where women had to compete over any man they saw cause the country was closed for foreignars and there were so little of young men left.

I legit believe this is the reason Russian women are the most beautiful in the world, men could simply select the most beautiful of them to marry and the ugly had no kids.

Meanwhile, feminist matriarchal countries produce the ugliest women (and prettiest men) in the world.
 
If it were up to them, all sub8 males would be killed or become slaves
 
Women don't have any genuine beliefs, they throw their lot in with whatever appeals to their instincts—homemaking and having Chad's children.
 
Redistribute pussy (in Minecraft).
 
All women love socialism, they want all resources to be evenly distributed, to never have to work or any other egalitarian bullshit that socialists promise.
If the Soviet Union took over and followed its constituion, those lazy foids would either be dead or in labor camps, since "He who does not work, neither shall he eat"
However, when the subject is sexual freedom, women couldn't care less about equality or helping the "poor", they want the most freedom as they possibly can. They want the most capitalist society possible.
I can't believe they even care about the financially poor. They only claim to care about the poor when someone else pays, or they only give small amount to virtue signal. They really just care about themselves
I legit believe this is the reason Russian women are the most beautiful in the world, men could simply select the most beautiful of them to marry and the ugly had no kids.
I remember there was an academic who made a similar argument, though he pushed the timeline back to medieval wars and not just WWI and WWII. Can't find it now, but if I do I'd post it
 
It's all about self-interest

Women are losers in the economic domain so they want socialism there, but when it comes to sex they are in high demand and therefore want a brutal market economy that most men can't even compete in.

Women don't really give a fuck about the poor or incels
 
yes, soys do the same things, they are complete hypocrites
 
I'd support economical Marxism a little bit more if it wasn't infested by femicunts and their cucks nowadays.

During the early days of feminism, marxists and racial egalitarians were highly critical of it (and totally rightfully so).
 
Meanwhile, feminist matriarchal countries produce the ugliest women (and prettiest men) in the world.
How dare you ? All women are beautiful, inkwell.
 
All women love socialism, they want all resources to be evenly distributed, to never have to work or any other egalitarian bullshit that socialists promise.

However, when the subject is sexual freedom, women couldn't care less about equality or helping the "poor", they want the most freedom as they possibly can. They want the most capitalist society possible.

They don't give a shit if 99% of sex are had by 1% of men, to them freedom all of a sudden becomes a sacred deity to be worshiped, but only for having sex and using drugs.

Funny how that works.

It's easy to call their philosophy: opportunistic. If equality is good for them, then they want it, if freedom is good for them then they want it too. But it's men fault that women can force their brutal philosophy on society, democracy is a cool thing but nowadays it's parody of itself, only ~20% of population should have voting rights.


Russia was a free real estate for men after 30 million of them died in both world wars. It is the one of rare instances where women had to compete over any man they saw cause the country was closed for foreignars and there were so little of young men left.

it happeened in most countries in central/east europe, Poland lost ~18% of population mostly young men. After the war every men could get a wife. And nowadays those old fucks call young men losers for not having girlfriend lol(not to mention there's 100k more young men than women in Poland, and with influx of immigrants I would say that is more like 250k more young men than women, as immigrants are mostly young males). It would be easy to somewhat change this shit situation in western world and bring more women than men from poorer country(fucking even more thirdworldcels, but that's how world works), but west is on it path of autodestruction
 
Last edited:
Could be argued the sex market is the most consequentional of all markets. It’s really the one that matters the most
 
high IQ

in fact, this can be seen in Commie countries

where foids were given a lot of (sexual) freedom

it was so bad that it went all the way to modern times, which is why modern slavic women are whores and all mainland chinknoodlewhores are gold diggers

exp.

I've always wondered about this, if inceldom was a problem in socialist countries

Actually I remember lurking on /r/communism one time and I saw someone make a post saying "Communism makes sense except the promotion of the full sexual liberation of women, which can have bad effects on society as a whole, and hurts men" or sonething to that effect. The post eventually got deleted. I used to browse leftist communities all the time, I still do sorta, I would probably still be a Marxist if I didn't discover that there's a contradiction between female and male sexuality (could possibly be reconciled with Marxism - marxism is all about contradictions, can this contradiction be resolved or sublimated?) and that gender equality isn't possible because of the sexual power women hold.

Related post:


Realizing that incels were actually correct, despite being demonized in far-left communities, and that supporting feminism is against my own interests along with men as a whole, is probably the biggest plot twist in my life/ideological path.

Another thing, I notice parallels between the blackpill/incel community and online marxist "communities", not because they are related ideologically in any way (they're not) but dealing with the maturity and understanding of whatever the central topic is (like the blackpill). On /r/communism for example the majority of the people are kinda stupid and a lot of the posts are questions about something, usually stupid questions, and only a select few people know how to properly defend Marxism and the history of socialism, the rest will get swallowed up by liberalism eventually when their worldview falls apart and they can easily be embarrassed in a debate. You see a same phenomenon on incels.co in relation to the blackpill, in my opinion
 
Last edited:
There is a movie about a Russian sniper during WW2. I think, I'm not sure though, that it's in this movie that there is a great black pill.

One character is jealous of the affection his love interest has for an other guy. He then reflects on how communism can not solve all inequalities, because some people are just born with natural advantages in life, in that case looks and talent (I think he was jealous of the sniper), and communism can't do shit about that. In the movie the character was a fervent communist but jealousy made him doubt his political beliefs.

In fact, arguably communism makes things even worse, because if people can't be more economically successful than others, then the only thing people can stand out for to attract women, is genetics, basically.

That movie was Enemy at the Gates. Interesting film, on the plus side it wasn't your generic cookie cutter WWII movie, and it didn't gloss over the brutality of the Stalinist regime. On the other hand, the ending (the character you mentioned, a political officer, ends up questioning all his long-held beliefs and ultimately sacrifices himself so the "hero" Chad sniper can kill the enemy sniper and ride off into the sunset with the Stacy female soldier) was formulaic Hollywood, with the typical way of "solving" a love triangle (kill off one of the men, always the less chadly one; Pearl Harbor did the same thing).
 
There is a movie about a Russian sniper during WW2. I think, I'm not sure though, that it's in this movie that there is a great black pill.

One character is jealous of the affection his love interest has for an other guy. He then reflects on how communism can not solve all inequalities, because some people are just born with natural advantages in life, in that case looks and talent (I think he was jealous of the sniper), and communism can't do shit about that. In the movie the character was a fervent communist but jealousy made him doubt his political beliefs.

In fact, arguably communism makes things even worse, because if people can't be more economically successful than others, then the only thing people can stand out for to attract women, is genetics, basically.
Stalingrad?

edit: nvm not the right movie
 
Stalingrad?

edit: nvm not the right movie
I think that's the French title.


I didn't know it was directed by Jean-Jacques Annaud. He's an interesting director, for sure. I saw "the name of the rose" as a kid, possibly the first sex scene I've ever watched on screen. Hot AF. IIRC the whole plot of the movie was kind of a black pill because it's all about sex being this powerful, secret force that turns men mad. It's only a tiny black because the story takes place in a very different society from ours so it's hard to relate to, but it's dumb because human nature is always the same.
 

Similar threads

Balding Subhuman
Replies
13
Views
200
IceBathMogger
I
antisocialcel
Replies
5
Views
189
BPJ
BPJ
Alexander400
Replies
16
Views
765
Genetics_subhuman
Genetics_subhuman
Stupid Clown
Replies
14
Views
506
blackpillednigga
blackpillednigga
Stupid Clown
Replies
6
Views
137
Grodd
Grodd

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top