Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill The decline of sex

  • Thread starter Deleted member 10124
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 10124

Self-banned
-
Joined
Jul 8, 2018
Posts
13,424

Screenshot 20191123 093847


So the whole leftist crap of "equality & diversity" goes out the window in favour of will oh the wisp "libertarianism" whenever it suits them. How very Nazi lite all this selective eugenics. SJW in the streets. KKK in the sheets.

Screenshot 20191123 093940


I expected better than the usual :soy: Incel bashing but genuinely on point regarding our problems.

Screenshot 20191123 094044


Revolutions formed that way my dear man. Revolutions on the whole were successful.

Screenshot 20191123 094111


Last sentence. No shit.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20191123-093847.jpg
    Screenshot_20191123-093847.jpg
    282 KB · Views: 78
If only all the combined frusturation and rage of incels could be used as one political force. It'll mostly be wasted by guys donating to camwhores and becoming "friends" with them. The potential lost.
 
That first quote infuriates me. "Less attractive, talented, or genetically fit men reproduced less".

We talked about that already. Sexual selection of women on men is a poor indicator of genetic quality. Unless you're racist, the racepil itself proves it.

Not to mention, most men still used to get married. Celibacy was not prevalent. Those "inferior" men indeed reproduced less, but not because of celibacy, rather because of cuckoldry.

Also, Chad starts to fuck in high school, way before he has achieved anything in his stupid life. How can women pretend they pick him because he's "more talented". It's complete BS.
 
Last edited:
Brutal yet interesting. We're doomed
 
If only all the combined frusturation and rage of incels could be used as one political force. It'll mostly be wasted by guys donating to camwhores and becoming "friends" with them. The potential lost.
Someone has to start speaking about not giving money to women for nothing
 
Porn has already been strongly linked with a steep fall in sexual violence among young men. Now it seems pornography has caused a more general decline in sexual interest among young men, which is leading to higher rates of celibacy among that group.

Why do they come up with this? Who the fuck wants to watch some other guy fuck a hot young girl.

The reason guys watch porn is because real women are a meme to most guys, like a mirage in the desert.

Obviously we would have wanted the real thing.
 
That first quote infuriates me. "Less attractive, talented, or genetically fit men reproduced less".

We talked about that already. Sexual selection of women on men is a poor indicator of genetic quality. Unless you're racist, the racepil itself proves it.

Not to mention, most men still used to get married. Celibacy was not prevalent. Those "inferior" men indeed reproduced less, but not because of celibacy, rather because of cuckoldry.

Also, Chad starts to fuck in high school, way before he has achieved anything in his stupid life. How can women pretend they pick him because he's "more talented". It's complete BS.

I think he's touching upon looks, money & status.

Thing is I wouldn't give a fuck if I had access to legalised or decriminalized prostitution, better anti STI drugs, better anti contraceptives for bareback.

Then better & well paid jobs, better access to surrogacy, better access to artificial wombs, better access to child care, affordable homes, better health care, better education, better civil defence, better foreign defence. Etc.

Watch the current so called hierarchy that the author mentions evaporate over night.

Ps. We're nearly there what I mentioned.
the fire rises
Thing is. If you mention "misogynistic hate speech" in a condemnation tone. Are you truly libertarian as libertarianism counters authoritarianism under the auspices of "*insert whoever* are wonderful effect" & therefore needs utmost protection.
 
Last edited:
Why do they come up with this? Who the fuck wants to watch some other guy fuck a hot young girl.

The reason guys watch porn is because real women are a meme to most guys, like a mirage in the desert.

Obviously we would have wanted the real thing.
That should be common sense.

How can someone seriously think guys are content with porn and don't care about getting the real thing ?
 
If only all the combined frusturation and rage of incels could be used as one political force.

It will be. It's happening now.
That should be common sense.

How can someone seriously think guys are content with porn and don't care about getting the real thing ?

I'm not. That's why I Escortcelled & even then I go in only for GFE ALL the time.
 
It's all about genetics. But if less attractive, talented, or genetically fit men can't procreate, so, less attractive, talented, or genetically fit woman will do this. Natural selection is bs.
 
It's all about genetics. But if less attractive, talented, or genetically fit men can't procreate, so, less attractive, talented, or genetically fit woman will do this. Natural selection is bs.

Yeah. I've noticed. Short women should not be allowed to breed as they'll create short men. Short men create short women. So it goes.

Funnily enough short men & average to tallish women create average height to tall sons but small daughters. Both offspring sexually attractive to the opposite sex.

The whole natural selection is b.s..
 
That first quote infuriates me. "Less attractive, talented, or genetically fit men reproduced less".

We talked about that already. Sexual selection of women on men is a poor indicator of genetic quality. Unless you're racist, the racepil itself proves it.

Not to mention, most men still used to get married. Celibacy was not prevalent. Those "inferior" men indeed reproduced less, but not because of celibacy, rather because of cuckoldry.

Also, Chad starts to fuck in high school, way before he has achieved anything in his stupid life. How can women pretend they pick him because he's "more talented". It's complete BS.

They pick him because of genetic fitness.
 
Redistribute sex (in Minecraft).
 
"Whether this trend is seen as negative or positive is largely subjective."

1454098573885s.jpg
 
Fucking boomer faggot. Eugenics only for men it seems.
 
He brutally described inceldom and its history and the castes of men who mate, women, and the celibate men but then goes on to describe incels today as "Angry and entitled... Hmm.. they might have some valid points though". Did he forget what he just wrote earlier? Yes, we're clearly correct.
 
He brutally described inceldom and its history and the castes of men who mate, women, and the celibate men but then goes on to describe incels today as "Angry and entitled... Hmm.. they might have some valid points though". Did he forget what he just wrote earlier? Yes, we're clearly correct.

He's careful about what he writes. He's fundamentally agreeing with us though although he can't come out & say it due to the industry (Adult I believe) he's working in.
"Whether this trend is seen as negative or positive is largely subjective."

1454098573885s.jpg
Let every "losers in the mate gaming" going to ER and we will see if is subjective.

Thing is. Nobody & I mean nobody in this day & age are going to take their subjugation & oppression placidly. Especially when we're bombarded daily with the "grievances of oppressed minorities" day in, day out.
Redistribute sex (in Minecraft).

Thing is I wouldn't give a fuck if I had access to legalised or decriminalized prostitution, better anti STI drugs, better anti contraceptives for bareback.

Then better & well paid jobs, better access to surrogacy, better access to artificial wombs, better access to child care, affordable homes, better health care, better education, better civil defence, better foreign defence. Etc.

Watch the current so called hierarchy that the author mentions evaporate over night.
 
Last edited:
It is also beneficial for evolution that low IQ populations, dumb single mothers and poor people die off, so what? Hypocritical motherfuckers.

I hate those evolution motherfuckers more that anything. How about I break your fucking skull hitting it repeatedly against a wall, would it be beneficial for evolution?
 
It is also beneficial for evolution that low IQ populations, dumb single mothers and poor people die off, so what? Hypocritical motherfuckers.

Precisely this.
 
Most countries in the world practise monogamy, those that are polygamous are far poorer and more unstable in comparison. This has to be for a reason.
 
It's all about genetics. But if less attractive, talented, or genetically fit men can't procreate, so, less attractive, talented, or genetically fit woman will do this. Natural selection is bs.
I hate those evolution motherfuckers more that anything. How about I break your fucking skull hitting it repeatedly against a wall, would it be beneficial for evolution?
Based.
 
Let every "losers in the mate gaming" going to ER and we will see if is subjective.

they deserve everything they get.

It is also beneficial for evolution that low IQ populations, dumb single mothers and poor people die off, so what? Hypocritical motherfuckers.

I hate those evolution motherfuckers more that anything. How about I break your fucking skull hitting it repeatedly against a wall, would it be beneficial for evolution?
lol, high iq as always, things like this just make me rage aimlessly.
 
Most countries in the world practise monogamy, those that are polygamous are far poorer and more unstable in comparison. This has to be for a reason.

High IQ. The economist even pointed this out.

Civil war & consanguinity further down the road in this current climate.
 
Women pick most normal phenotypes, not the fittest ones.
Major cope. Normal would imply most frequently occuring, and Chad is not a normal phenotype among males by any stretch of the imagination. Also, define fittest. Sure, you can find some outlier that is extremely high IQ or able to fight physically, or resist certain bacteria or whatever, but it does not really matter. Foid selection is for the top-tier males, and for gene stability (actually the most 'fit' if you really think about it). Genetics which would last for more than one generation.. regression toward the mean and all that, should not be ignored.
 
Normal would imply most frequently occuring,
No, that's not what I meant.

By normal, I mean average. Right in the center of the fitness curve.

I've already explained my theory about this. Women are attracted by phenotypes that don't deviate from the average, because those phenotypes indicate low mutation loads and are thus safer from a reproductive strategy.
 
No, that's not what I meant.

By normal, I mean average. Right in the center of the fitness curve.
That is what a bell curve would imply, no? The most average and 'normal' would be found in the middle, where Chad would not be. Do you disagree?
 
That is what a bell curve would imply, no? The most average and 'normal' would be found in the middle, where Chad would not be. Do you disagree?

I believe Chad is indeed in the middle of the curve.

Of course, it depends on how we define fitness. Nowadays, since natural selection is essentially reduced to sexual selection, Chad is indeed to the right of the curve.

However, in a more primitive society, the Chad phenotype would have very little impact on survival, except maybe height. The only reason it attracts females, IMHO, is that mating with him is less likely to endanger the woman during childbirth. Let me just remind you that the C-section has existed for millennias, possibly ever since people had cutting tools. Just think about the fact that the procedure is named after one of the greatest emperor who has ever lived : he was cut out from the womb of his mother, and she died (I assume).

Men and women are subjected to different selective pressures, and as a result their notion of fitness and thus attractiveness is different.
 
Last edited:
Someone has to start speaking about not giving money to women for nothing
good luck convincing low iq simp bitchboys and boomertards. just go on twitch and try by messaging them they are the obvious ones donating and moderating for the scamwhores
 
He need to read some writings by Roger Devlin.

Women do not select mates whos qualities are best TODAY for TODAYs species, but their sexual preferences and instincts developed during primitive days, many thousands of years ago, so the "qualities" they are attracted to, are neccesarily NOT good for a modern, civilised society.

So no, its not "better for the specie" that Stacy fuck 30 different criminal Jeremy Meeks who bash her fucking head in every other day instead of some high IQ engineer.


Polygamous societies ALWAYS end up like shit-holes, due to violence, cause of tons of men raging when they have no family or nothing to live for. We have (HAD) monogamy for a fucking reason, you damn retard.
 
He need to read some writings by Roger Devlin.

Women do not select mates whos qualities are best TODAY for TODAYs species, but their sexual preferences and instincts developed during primitive days, many thousands of years ago, so the "qualities" they are attracted to, are neccesarily NOT good for a modern, civilised society.

So no, its not "better for the specie" that Stacy fuck 30 different criminal Jeremy Meeks who bash her fucking head in every other day instead of some high IQ engineer.


Polygamous societies ALWAYS end up like shit-holes, due to violence, cause of tons of men raging when they have no family or nothing to live for. We have (HAD) monogamy for a fucking reason, you damn retard.

It's only going to get worse.



Ps. This doesn't work though. Consanguinity down at the end of the road. No definite that they're kids are going to be Stacies or Chads down the line. Civil war since why should men contribute & get nothing in return. Why are women & Chads entitled to this current set up. Even that Brian Tracy in his motivational CDs said the difference between the abilities of the very top & bottom are marginal to say the least.

It'll just encourage cannibalism, selfishness, self glorification & gratification & fundamentally the death of homosapiens in the long run.
 
It always make me laugh when it comes to how 'women pick best genes in men'. Sure, if we talking about caveman times. Nowadays with our technology and society it's much more dangerous to be poor than to be weak physically. And if we want humanity to survive we need smart people, milions of cavemen Chads will do nothing if we gonna have to leave Earth, one STEMcel is worth more. But women(and men mostly too, but it seems we are more evolved or suited to live in more technologically advanced society) still work on old software OH MY GOD HE HAS SUCH STRONG JAW, WHAT A GENETIC ELITE. Meanwhile people like Isaac Newton and Nicola Tesla died as virgins(I'm not sure about Tesla). It's like we need 7 or 10 bilions of people instead of population even 100x smaller but with more extraordinary people.
And btw one could argue that there is no such thing as superior genes, just genes better suited for some environments. Not to mention that some manlet can have overall shitty genes but have immunity to some deadly disease that will wipe out half of humanity -> that's why genetic diversity is so important, society of perfect Chads can be destroyed by one virus.
 
It always make me laugh when it comes to how 'women pick best genes in men'. Sure, if we talking about caveman times. Nowadays with our technology and society it's much more dangerous to be poor than to be weak physically. And if we want humanity to survive we need smart people, milions of cavemen Chads will do nothing if we gonna have to leave Earth, one STEMcel is worth more. But women(and men mostly too, but it seems we are more evolved or suited to live in more technologically advanced society) still work on old software OH MY GOD HE HAS SUCH STRONG JAW, WHAT A GENETIC ELITE. Meanwhile people like Isaac Newton and Nicola Tesla died as virgins(I'm not sure about Tesla). It's like we need 7 or 10 bilions of people instead of population even 100x smaller but with more extraordinary people.
And btw one could argue that there is no such thing as superior genes, just genes better suited for some environments. Not to mention that some manlet can have overall shitty genes but have immunity to some deadly disease that will wipe out half of humanity -> that's why genetic diversity is so important, society of perfect Chads can be destroyed by one virus.

Fucking based as fuck. So this.
 
That first quote infuriates me. "Less attractive, talented, or genetically fit men reproduced less".

We talked about that already. Sexual selection of women on men is a poor indicator of genetic quality. Unless you're racist, the racepil itself proves it.

Not to mention, most men still used to get married. Celibacy was not prevalent. Those "inferior" men indeed reproduced less, but not because of celibacy, rather because of cuckoldry.

Also, Chad starts to fuck in high school, way before he has achieved anything in his stupid life. How can women pretend they pick him because he's "more talented". It's complete BS.
the statuspill is much better proof of this
 
Celibacy jumped from 10% to 30% in 10 years? lmao i'm so fucking unlucky to be born in this generation
 
It always make me laugh when it comes to how 'women pick best genes in men'. Sure, if we talking about caveman times. Nowadays with our technology and society it's much more dangerous to be poor than to be weak physically. And if we want humanity to survive we need smart people, milions of cavemen Chads will do nothing if we gonna have to leave Earth, one STEMcel is worth more. But women(and men mostly too, but it seems we are more evolved or suited to live in more technologically advanced society) still work on old software OH MY GOD HE HAS SUCH STRONG JAW, WHAT A GENETIC ELITE. Meanwhile people like Isaac Newton and Nicola Tesla died as virgins(I'm not sure about Tesla). It's like we need 7 or 10 bilions of people instead of population even 100x smaller but with more extraordinary people.
And btw one could argue that there is no such thing as superior genes, just genes better suited for some environments. Not to mention that some manlet can have overall shitty genes but have immunity to some deadly disease that will wipe out half of humanity -> that's why genetic diversity is so important, society of perfect Chads can be destroyed by one virus.

Damn that's a good text. This needs to be pasted everytime the fucking argument "women improve our species by selecting men" is brought up.
 

Similar threads

Raider919
Replies
10
Views
574
Raider919
Raider919
Eremetic
Replies
26
Views
2K
Serpents reign
Serpents reign
Lonelyus
Replies
8
Views
996
Eremetic
Eremetic
Eremetic
Replies
3
Views
829
PurgatoryPass
PurgatoryPass

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top