Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Agecucks should honestly fuck off

S

Sean

Diagnosed ADHD
★★★
Joined
Nov 2, 2021
Posts
243
Seriously, what's up with this "stop the pedophilia" bullshit?

We are not sexually attracted to children as they have underdeveloped bodies. People who are sexually attracted to children have mental disorders. Most of us are not pedophiles for that reason.

Hebephilia and ephebophilia are different. Being sexually attracted to 13-year-olds and 14-year-olds is considered to be hebephilia. Being sexually attracted to 15-year-olds all the way to 19-year-olds is considered to ephebophilia.

Hebephilia is not clinically seen as a mental disorder and a deviant sexuality like pedophilia is. Ephebophilia was studied. It's perfectly natural for healthy heterosexual males to feel sexually attracted to mid-teenagers, i.e. 15 to 19.

This hysteria is largely found in North America where the age of consent is 16 in most states, but many South American and European countries have their age of consent as low as 14 and 15.

Historically, older men would marry mid-teenagers because these older men had more resources and these teenage girls were healthier, more fertile, and prettier. Traditionally, the parents of the girls would approve of the men taking them as spouses.

Today, society sees actual deviant sexual behavior like homosexuality as "normal", whereas NORMAL relations as in older men engaging with younger women are seen as morally "wrong". How ironic.

We all know mid-teenage girls who date younger men, don't we? That will never change because it's natural. Girls mature faster and earlier than boys, so they usually prefer older guys who are already mature. Agecucks can cry, but will never change nature. And that's that!
 
Last edited:
I think a big part of it is wanting to make up for missed experiences from a younger age. Like any foid past 18 is gonna be so experienced and used up. Like you’ll never get to be a foids first
 
Nah there are literal retards here that claim 10 years old is prime
 
Nah there are literal retards here that claim 10 years old is prime
They are either trolls or retards. 10 is too young. It's a child by all definitions.

13 to 19 is adolescence by most definitions.

Being attracted to 13 and 14-year-olds is hebephilia (quite natural) and 15 to 19-year-olds, ephebophilia (very natural).

In my opinion, the age of consent should be 14. There's a safe bridge between 12 (childhood), all through early adolescence (13), to 14 years of age.
 
These people are product of their time. They were raised thinking that such thing would be bad. They are literally courses about that at College that you are forced to take for. What is curious is that every time that they will argue that old fucks have "an advantage of power" if you argue with that foids who fuck Chad can perfectly fuck an old ass nigga. Such argument proves that there's no biologically limitation between sexual relationships between teenage girls and grown ass niggas. Therefore is a social construct.
 
Today, society sees actual deviant sexual behavior like homosexuality as "normal", whereas NORMAL relations as in older men engaging with younger women are seen as morally "wrong". How ironic.
Girls mature faster and earlier than boys, so they usually prefer older guys who are already mature. Agecucks can cry, but will never change nature. And that's that!

That really gets me. We live in a time where homosexuality and transgenderism is seen as more "normal" or "healthy" than a man enjoying the sight of a fucking 14-16 year old female. Give me a God Damn break! The hatred for heterosexual males has never been more omnipresent.

Exactly. Gigabased thread.

:bigbrain:
 
1636414896271
 
They are either trolls or retards. 10 is too young. It's a child by all definitions.

13 to 19 is adolescence by most definitions.

Being attracted to 13 and 14-year-olds is hebephilia (quite natural) and 15 to 19-year-olds, ephebophilia (very natural).

In my opinion, the age of consent should be 14. There's a safe bridge between 12 (childhood), all through early adolescence (13), to 14 years of age.

Definitely seems about right to me. 14 ensures that every individual female is ready, barring the ones with such severe disorders that they probably never go through puberty anyway.
 
Seriously, what's up with this "stop the pedophilia" bullshit?

We are not sexually attracted to children as they have underdeveloped bodies. People who are sexually attracted to children have mental disorders. Most of us are not pedophiles for that reason.

Hebephilia and ephebophilia are different. Being sexually attracted to 13-year-olds and 14-year-olds is considered to be hebephilia. Being sexually attracted to 15-year-olds all the way to 19-year-olds is considered to ephebophilia.

Hebephilia is not clinically seen as a mental disorder and a deviant sexuality like pedophilia is. Ephebophilia was studied. It's perfectly natural for healthy heterosexual males to feel sexually attracted to mid-teenagers, i.e. 15 to 19.

This hysteria is largely found in North America where the age of consent is 16 in most states, but many South American and European countries have their age of consent as low as 14 and 15.

Historically, older men would marry mid-teenagers because these older men had more resources and these teenage girls were healthier, more fertile, and prettier. Traditionally, the parents of the girls would approve of the men taking them as spouses.

Today, society sees actual deviant sexual behavior like homosexuality as "normal", whereas NORMAL relations as in older men engaging with younger women are seen as morally "wrong". How ironic.

We all know mid-teenage girls who date younger men, don't we? That will never change because it's natural. Girls mature faster and earlier than boys, so they usually prefer older guys who are already mature. Agecucks can cry, but will never change nature. And that's that!
Fair points mate
 
That really gets me. We live in a time where homosexuality and transgenderism is seen as more "normal" or "healthy" than a man enjoying the sight of a fucking 14-16 year old female. Give me a God Damn break!
Gynocentric soyciety/roasties be jealous.
 
Definitely seems about right to me. 14 ensures that every individual female is ready, barring the ones with such severe disorders that they probably never go through puberty anyway.
Girls are ready far earlier than 14 though. I knew girls who were 12 and sexually active in Middle School. Hell, when I was 10 (rucking TEN) I knew a white girl who would make out with her BF in the school bathroom.

Many girls hit puberty by 6 and want cock by the time they're 9-12 years old
 
Loli appears on this thread to rid it of agecucks: you have been blessed. :owo:
1638726513488-png.543164
 
I don't know why anyone would go out of their way to be an agecuck as an incel
Loli appears on this thread to rid it of agecucks: you have been blessed. :owo:
1638726513488-png.543164
:owo:
 
Nah there are literal retards here that claim 10 years old is prime
Not to sound like a pervert, but they are. I have a 21 y/o female cousin and I can ASSURE you she looked cuter when she was 12 than she does now. She looks kinda Asian since my family is Turk, so she still looks child-like but she was def better looking 10 years ago

Likewise, I have a 12 and 13 y/o sister and I'm pretty sure they've already reached their peaks judging by what my 17 y/o sister looks like
 
Girls are ready far earlier than 14 though. I knew girls who were 12 and sexually active in Middle School. Hell, when I was 10 (rucking TEN) I knew a white girl who would make out with her BF in the school bathroom.

Many girls hit puberty by 6 and want cock by the time they're 9-12 years old
Fair point, but in an ideal society 14 should secure the sexual and psychological development of most girls until they are finally ready to engage in such relations. I know younger girls can be naughty, but this is just a preparation for when they reach maturity. They should be oriented during this phase and not engage in sexual relations that early, in my opinion.

Loli appears on this thread to rid it of agecucks: you have been blessed. :owo:
1638726513488-png.543164
Amen.

I don't know why anyone would go out of their way to be an agecuck as an incel

:owo:
I know, right.
 
Girls are ready far earlier than 14 though. I knew girls who were 12 and sexually active in Middle School. Hell, when I was 10 (rucking TEN) I knew a white girl who would make out with her BF in the school bathroom.

Many girls hit puberty by 6 and want cock by the time they're 9-12 years old

Hmm.. it's hard to gauge since males are slower. The question is just how much slower. The mainstream would have us believe not much slower, if anything. Many females hitting puberty at 6? Damn.

The gap between males and females could be wider than 2 years. Personally I was just slow and didn't even cum until nearly 15, so it is hard to relate.

Fair point, but in an ideal society 14 should secure the sexual and psychological development of most girls until they are finally ready to engage in such relations. I know younger girls can be naughty, but this is just a preparation for when they reach maturity. They should be oriented during this phase and not engage in sexual relations that early, in my opinion.

Based. It takes time to find her a suitable mate in the first place. If she starts having her period, she isn't going to be jumping into sex immediately.
 
Last edited:
Fair point, but in an ideal society 14 should secure the sexual and psychological development of most girls until they are finally ready to engage in such relations. I know younger girls can be naughty, but this is just a preparation for when they reach maturity. They should be oriented during this phase and not engage in sexual relations that early, in my opinion.
It doesn't really matter what we think to be fair, since at the end of the day, it's not like we can change much. Though, let's be blunt, if Chad wanted to marry and fuck a 10 y/o loli who's gone through puberty, not only would her father allow it, the 10 y/o loli would also love it and would not consider herself a victim

This is a Syrian couple where the girl was 12 when the guy married her and she admits she knew NOTHING about sex and her husband "taught her what to do" if you get what I mean:feelsohh::feelsohh::feelsohh: JUST IMAGINE. Exploring your loli wife's body as you "teach her":feelsLSD:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_0ccF1FsUU&list=LL&index=3&ab_channel=MalekMaktabil%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%83%D9%85%D9%83%D8%AA%D8%A8%D9%8A

(video isn't working on the site for some reason, click on the link to see it on youtube)

Also BROOTAL eye color pill. They're arabs yet have blue eyes:feelsUnreal::feelsUnreal::feelsUnreal:
 
Last edited:
The geography teacher's been very lonely :feelshaha:

 
anything above 14 yo is acceptable imo, since it's around that time they start puberty
Nah there are literal retards here that claim 10 years old is prime
I remember a thread in which the majority was lusting for 9 yo girls so it wouldn't surprise me

still doesn't compare to reddit who thinks 21 yo girls aren't actual adults yet lmfao
 
Hmm.. it's hard to gauge since males are slower. The question is just how much slower. The mainstream would have us believe not much slower, if anything. Many females hitting puberty at 6? Damn.

The gap between males and females could be wider than 2 years. Personally I was just slow and didn't even cum until nearly 15, so it is hard to relate.
The guy being older than the woman would be acceptable. If a girl is 12, she can just marry a 16 y/o

If you didn't cum until 15, you're definitley late. I think I had my first wet dream when I was like 11, though I DO also remeber 12 y/o boys in my class talking about masterbation and porn without shame, so take that how you will.
 
Nah dude, if you find girls below 15 attractive then you have a problem. end of story, i can see some girls at 15/16 being already well developed and atractive, but below that they're just kids
 
They should be oriented during this phase and not engage in sexual relations that early, in my opinion.
It's not that I disagree, that's probably the best for the girls but why care about todays 12 year old girls who are going to look at you with disgust in 10 years.
 
sean spitting fax on .is rn
 
Nah dude, if you find girls below 15 attractive then you have a problem. end of story, i can see some girls at 15/16 being already well developed and atractive, but below that they're just kids
13 and 14 are not kids. Not biologically and not by any scientific definition. If YOU are not attracted to them, that's okay, but they are not children and they perfectly know what they're doing when it comes to sex. People who say otherwise haven't been around girls that often. I have, and they are naughty.
 
13 and 14 are not kids. Not biologically and not by any scientific definition. If YOU are not attracted to them, that's okay, but they are not children and they perfectly know what they're doing when it comes to sex. People who say otherwise haven't been around girls that often. I have, and they are naughty.
Dude are you serious? while there are a couple of 13/14 kids having sex that dosnt mean most of them do, also even if they did that dosnt correlate to them not being kids.
 
Dude are you serious? while there are a couple of 13/14 kids having sex that dosnt mean most of them do, also even if they did that dosnt correlate to them not being kids.
A major classic work of literature was based around a couple of that age's relationship though (Romeo & Juliet).
 
Dude are you serious? while there are a couple of 13/14 kids having sex that dosnt mean most of them do, also even if they did that dosnt correlate to them not being kids.
whether something is a kid is a matter of definition dude....
 
Dude are you serious? while there are a couple of 13/14 kids having sex that dosnt mean most of them do, also even if they did that dosnt correlate to them not being kids.
"Dude", they are not considered to be children. 13 and 14-year-old girls are pubescent teenagers in early adolescence. Their bodies are developing fast, their pubic hair already started to show up, their sexual hormones are active, they usually have periods around that age so they can bear children, they have clear secondary sex characteristics (visible boobs, butts, etc), and a compilation of other things that most ADOLESCENTS have. They are not children.
 
I think a big part of it is wanting to make up for missed experiences from a younger age. Like any foid past 18 is gonna be so experienced and used up. Like you’ll never get to be a foids first
Exactly this. I simply cant imagine myself anymore with a foid my age thinking how much she has been tossed down :feelsbadman:
 
I think the Catholic Church said 16 year old foids and 18 year old males can get married. This is probably just because there's a few foids whose hips aren't wide enough yet and would fuck up the baby if they went any younger. Also, agecucks are always talking about some like 40 year old when in reality it would be like a 20 year old who is also a "child" by that definition
 
A major classic work of literature was based around a couple of that age's relationship though (Romeo & Juliet).
Yes, and we used to fight with sticks and hunt for food. i dont say this didn't happen, there were lots of examples of presidents that had a wife who was aged 14. even hitler had something going on with a 14 year old, that dosn't make it right.

"Dude", they are not considered to be children. 13 and 14-year-old girls are pubescent teenagers in early adolescence. Their bodies are developing fast, their pubic hair already started to show up, their sexual hormones are active, they usually have periods around that age so they can bear children, they have clear secondary sex characteristics (visible boobs, butts, etc), and a compilation of other things that most ADOLESCENTS have. They are not children.
In most states you're not considered an adult till you're 18, if you're found with +18 material you will go to prison. so then we can assume that while they're not "childs" they're childs, you can go towards a grey area of 16-17 which most males wont admit but will feel attraction towards.
Now if you go lower than 14 then you just have something wrong in your head, there's literally nothing you could have in common with a girl at that age and you should not find them attractive. you're saying that because they present early stages of womanhood they're not children jesus christ, i hope you're a kid yourself cause that's the only way i can see yourself making this kind of argument either that or you're just trolling.

whether something is a kid is a matter of definition dude....
Yeah, say that to the FBI later.
 
Yes, and we used to fight with sticks and hunt for food. i dont say this didn't happen, there were lots of examples of presidents that had a wife who was aged 14. even hitler had something going on with a 14 year old, that dosn't make it right.

Hitler? Well that's just even more reason to support it. Based.

In most states you're not considered an adult till you're 18, if you're found with +18 material you will go to prison. so then we can assume that while they're not "childs" they're childs, you can go towards a grey area of 16-17 which most males wont admit but will feel attraction towards.
Now if you go lower than 14 then you just have something wrong in your head, there's literally nothing you could have in common with a girl at that age and you should not find them attractive. you're saying that because they present early stages of womanhood they're not children jesus christ, i hope you're a kid yourself cause that's the only way i can see yourself making this kind of argument either that or you're just trolling.

Under 14 it gets muddy, especially because not all females develop at the same rates. Slower ones are going to be more child than not at <14. Keep in mind that females actually tend to develop faster than they did in times long ago. So a 14 year old female today is more sexually mature than a 14 year old female 100+ years ago.

But 14 for a female is fine. A male that is 14 is more of a kid than a female, for certain. If there's nothing wrong with a 16 year old male giving consent, then there's certainly no reason for there to be anything wrong with a 14 year old female giving consent.

I think we can reach a consensus that 14 is the proper AoC for a civilized, monogamous, advanced civilization. In National Socialist Germany, the AoC was also 14.

The only time the AoC has been higher than 14 is in recent times with feminism. And if you support feminism, then you're a CUCK.
 
Last edited:
They are either trolls or retards. 10 is too young. It's a child by all definitions.

13 to 19 is adolescence by most definitions.

Being attracted to 13 and 14-year-olds is hebephilia (quite natural) and 15 to 19-year-olds, ephebophilia (very natural).

In my opinion, the age of consent should be 14. There's a safe bridge between 12 (childhood), all through early adolescence (13), to 14 years of age.


:bigbrain::bigbrain: and based.
 
As a crippled old elderly lonely man I tend to agree
 
Now if you go lower than 14 then you just have something wrong in your head,

There is literally zero evidence for what you've just said here. Not only is hebephilia, defined as attraction to pubescents aged 11-14, not considered a mental illness, it is not even listed as a paraphilia in the latest version of the DSM. Men evolved to be aroused by sexually mature females, no matter what modern society says the age of consent should be.


there's literally nothing you could have in common with a girl at that age and you should not find them attractive.

Relationships have nothing to do with common interests. Modern relationships revolve around the man's looks, money, and status, and nothing more. Personality and sharing common interests and values are bluepilled nonsense.

Men and women are opposites. Feminists in recent years have the desire to change that fundamental reality, but the natural order will always be for men to be dominant and in a position of authority, and for foids to be submissive and obedient.

you're saying that because they present early stages of womanhood they're not children jesus christ, i hope you're a kid yourself cause that's the only way i can see yourself making this kind of argument either that or you're just trolling.

Teenagers are not children, they are teenagers. There’s a reason it’s two different words.
 
:feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha:
:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

The Jew wants them all to himself, where he can use his money and influence to stay above the laws he created for the masses.
They are reserved for Epstein and his famous (((friends)))
 
anything above 14 yo is acceptable imo, since it's around that time they start puberty
girls start puberty earlier, in their preteens, where the heck did you learn they start at 14?
 
I do agree that foids under 16 aren't innocent ( I remember foids sleeping around in 7th grade), I still think that the age of consent should be 17 , 15 year old foids look like children to me.
 
I do agree that foids under 16 aren't innocent ( I remember foids sleeping around in 7th grade), I still think that the age of consent should be 17 , 15 year old foids look like children to me.

CUCK
 

Similar threads

Clavicus Vile
Replies
7
Views
464
La Grande Infamie
La Grande Infamie
I
Replies
15
Views
375
Julaybib
Julaybib
AsiaCel
Replies
30
Views
822
ItsovERfucks
ItsovERfucks
Shrek
Replies
19
Views
942
Julaybib
Julaybib

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top