subhuman
Fuck it, we ball
★★★★★
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2022
- Posts
- 11,531
In his analysis of the capitalist mode of production, Marx distinguishes between the use value and the exchange value of a commodity. He defines use value as the actual worth you get from the usefulness of a commodity, how much it satisfies your needs. The exchange value, however, is the value of the commodity as it's exchanged on the market for other commodities or money. In capitalist economies, the exchange value of a commodity is determined by the amount of labor it takes to produce it. The problem with capitalist societies is that it obscures this distinction between use value and exchange value. People focus only on the exchange value and because of this think money has inherent value. This leads to a society where people only want to create profits, rather than satisfying actual human needs.Even supposing that you might have women in the future - which in all frankness I doubt - this will not be enough; nothing will ever be enough. You will always be an orphan to those adolescent loves you never knew. In you the wound is already deep; it will get deeper and deeper. An atrocious, unremitting bitterness will end up gripping your heart. For you there will be neither redemption nor deliverance. That's how it is. - Michel Houellebecq
Houellebecq says that the sexual "liberation" of the 60's sought to create sexual communism where everyone is equal, but really it created sexual capitalism. It's lead to the commodification of sex and inequality worse than third world shitholes, so I think this comparison is appropriate. Whenever I bring up that foids hit the wall at an average age of 24 and become worthless, there is always a bunch of simps here saying "the wall is cope. she still has dozens of options. she still spends decades like a rockstar fucking smoking hot partners, handpicking them on tinder like a menu. what did you have?"
And herein lies the problem. The value of foids is taken to be not their actual use value: the attractiveness of their bodies, ability to love, and potential to make healthy babies. Their value is taken to be the exchange value: how valuable they are on the market and how much work you have to put in to get one. Basically, the idea that foids even matter past the age of 24 is just a social construct that they've created in a desperate attempt to stay relevant. If you take the exchange value of foids to be their actual value, you are just a delusional foid worshipper.
The times that I actually touch grass or go outside and inevitably see couples, I become visibly enraged when I see teenagers walking around holding hands, and it's enough to put me in a bad mood for the rest of the day. But when I see adult couples trying to cope with their aging and act like young people, it's just cringe. I get secondhand embarrassment: For the guy thinking his old ran through foid is actually anything other than a liability for divorce rape, that it can somehow make up for all those lonely teenage years, and for the foid thinking she is still attractive. JFL. Once you're an adult you might as well just stay an incel. There's literally no difference once you get old. When you're not a teenager, all of life just becomes a preparation for death. The goal of life is missed.
Last edited: