Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment A top white male model only gets a 2.6% match rate (24 hours) on Tinder

R

RageAgainstTDL

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Posts
6,882
This is a classic Tinder experiment someone did on Quora here:

He made a bunch of fake profiles and set them to auto-like everyone in a 24 hour period and count the matches. The woman of course got the most matches at 26% match rate. The white male model (Harry Goodwins) got a 2.63% match rate. The Asian male model (Vince Lin) got a 1.01% match rate. A relatively average or maybe 5.5-6/10 white guy (King Booth) got 0.52%. The guy who ran the experiment and claims to be a 8.5 Asian male (AlphaWolf) got a 0.39% match rate. Lastly Prince Caspian, a roided up Asian guy, got 0.38%.

main-qimg-599878ee48bfe6105a0f0a1b712752e8


(Pictures of everyone are at that Quora link if you want to see them for yourself.)

What I found interesting about this one was:
  • The white male model only got around a 1/38 like rate.
  • The Asian male model only got around a 1/100 like rate.
  • A relatively average white guy decimated a supposedly 8.5 Asian male and a roided Asian male (obviously, JBW).
  • None of the Asians got messaged first (again, JBW).
Probably the match rates might have been higher if he wasn't auto-liking everyone, and if he left the experiment going longer. But the biggest point this illustrates is not that women's hypergamy is out of control. It certainly is. But that's not all that's happening here when even Harry Goodwins can't get more than 1/38 matches.

Tinder has so many dudes on it that it doesn't even show your profile unless you are really at the absolute top or paying for Boosts.

Now that guys are paying for so many Boosts, and it is obligated to show your profile if you're Boosting, probably boosting subhumans and GigaChads are the only profiles women see at all.

@NeetSupremacist & @Reddit_is_for_cucks you do a lot of Tinder experiments. I'm curious for your experience. Have you ever counted the number of likes you've given vs. the # of matches you get with your Chadfishes? What would you estimate you get with them?
 
Last edited:
How did that one Chadfisher get so many matches?

Also, consider that Tinder hides you if your ELO score is low. Or at least they used to. If this was done during the ELO Score Era, autoliking sounds like a good way to get marked as a bot and sent to the bottom of the deck.
 
it's over, what about an avg black guy and tyrone
 
this just means that the Elo and time of swiping was shit lol.. there are so many examples of this.
 
Must be an elo issue. My chadfishes got hundreds of likes and later resulting matches in a few hours.

Also more proof on r/chadfish

Auto like is best way into a shadowban that's the reason for the low match count I guess.
 
Now that guys are paying for so many Boosts, and it is obligated to show your profile if you're Boosting, probably boosting subhumans and GigaChads are the only profiles women see at all.
hol up, does this mean that tinder actually isn't real life but not for the reasons cucks say it is? kind of lifefuel tbh
 
This is a classic Tinder experiment someone did on Quora here:

He made a bunch of fake profiles and set them to auto-like everyone in a 24 hour period and count the matches. The woman of course got the most matches at 26% match rate. The white male model (Harry Goodwins) got a 2.63% match rate. The Asian male model (Vince Lin) got a 1.01% match rate. A relatively average or maybe 5.5-6/10 white guy (King Booth) got 0.52%. The guy who ran the experiment and claims to be a 8.5 Asian male (AlphaWolf) got a 0.39% match rate. Lastly Prince Caspian, a roided up Asian guy, got 0.38%.

main-qimg-599878ee48bfe6105a0f0a1b712752e8


(Pictures of everyone are at that Quora link if you want to see them for yourself.)

What I found interesting about this one was:
  • The white male model only got around a 1/38 like rate.
  • The Asian male model only got around a 1/100 like rate.
  • A relatively average white guy decimated a supposedly 8.5 Asian male and a roided Asian male (obviously, JBW).
  • None of the Asians got messaged first (again, JBW).
Probably the match rates might have been higher if he wasn't auto-liking everyone, and if he left the experiment going longer. But the biggest point this illustrates is not that women's hypergamy is out of control. It certainly is. But that's not all that's happening here when even Harry Goodwins can't get more than 1/38 matches.

Tinder has so many dudes on it that it doesn't even show your profile unless you are really at the absolute top or paying for Boosts.

Now that guys are paying for so many Boosts, and it is obligated to show your profile if you're Boosting, probably boosting subhumans and GigaChads are the only profiles women see at all.

@NeetSupremacist & @Reddit_is_for_cucks you do a lot of Tinder experiments. I'm curious for your experience. Have you ever counted the number of likes you've given vs. the # of matches you get with your Chadfishes? What would you estimate you get with them?

Holy fuck... this shit show is going to explode big time.
 
And some people deny the race pill.
 
auto-likes

There is the problem right there.

Tinder is shit, though. May have been okay when it first came out, but now it is only really a place for Chad to get laid... as if he needed any help to begin with.
 
There is the problem right there.

Tinder is shit, though. May have been okay when it first came out, but now it is only really a place for Chad to get laid... as if he needed any help to begin with.
Keep in mind the female profile was set to auto-like everyone as well and she still got a 26% match rate. That means at a minimum more than 1/4 guys she swiped on were shown her profile.

If autoswiping automatically put your profile into bot/spam mode she would not have gotten so many likes. I doubt Tinder has different spam filters depending on gender though I suppose it's possible. At most we could perhaps speculate this might have halved everyone's scores.

More likely this illustrates the point perfectly. There are fewer women on there and they spend less time swiping. Tinder adjusts accordingly. I can guarantee most men's profiles are not being seen at all by women unless again they are boosting or the absolute top 0.1% gigachad.
 
Last edited:
Ffs when tinder HQ gets confronted
 
Good work.

The fact male models get a tiny match rate means the system is rigged.
 
Wonder what would happen with a chadpreet
 
Lol his profile probably seemed fake to girls so they swiped left. The key is to make your profile look very real as if you are the person. And good/bad photos or better yet add instagram. Add personal photos etc.

I get a match rate of prob 30-40% and that’s after me being picky, I swipe left on sub 5 female too
 
JFL at the difference between the foid and the male model. And bluepillers still deny that men have it harder.

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-2b91ebdd91a04de9cc03f2bde940c57c
 
Keep in mind the female profile was set to auto-like everyone as well and she still got a 26% match rate. That means at a minimum more than 1/4 guys she swiped on were shown her profile.

If autoswiping automatically put your profile into bot/spam mode she would not have gotten so many likes. I doubt Tinder has different spam filters depending on gender though I suppose it's possible. At most we could perhaps speculate this might have halved everyone's scores.

More likely this illustrates the point perfectly. There are fewer women on there and they spend less time swiping. Tinder adjusts accordingly. I can guarantee most men's profiles are not being seen at all by women unless again they are boosting or the absolute top 0.1% gigachad.

There was be still another reason so many tinder experiment proof otherwise. Also 24% is really low for a foid.
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top