
Deleted member 27161
Death Awaits
-
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2020
- Posts
- 6,674
Tera level IQ. Bookmarked
Elon Musk may not be as "smart" as you think. Certainly he's not a real intellectual.Elon Musk IQ
I used to think foids liked nice guys, LOL
He isn't. He just has a great publicist that helped him build his public image as one. The average person thinks he's a genius on par with Newton and Tesla.Elon Musk may not be as "smart" as you think. Certainly he's not a real intellectual.
Agreed and..[UWSL]I don't know to what extent either man were humanities scholars? Also to call "genius" has become somewhat cliche. I suppose it means they have a lot of their family genes expressed in one person rt? [/UWSL][UWSL]Musk just makes everyone around him feel special so he became successful using this "Engineer" label to catapult to a [/UWSL][UWSL]monolithic sized man. And like you said, he's also got a good publicist.[/UWSL]He isn't. He just has a great publicist that helped him build his public image as one. The average person thinks he's a genius on par with Newton and Tesla.
Yes, genius is thrown around a lot. True genius is exceptionally rare. I don't think it's purely genetic. It's an important part of it. However, just as a coin is made from silver (or whatever other light metal), that one in some large number time that it lands perfectly on it's edge when tossed has little or nothing to do with the silver it's made from.Agreed and..[UWSL]I don't know to what extent either man were humanities scholars? Also to call "genius" has become somewhat cliche. I suppose it means they have a lot of their family genes expressed in one person rt? [/UWSL]
Which is very funny, because he's not an engineer. That's a testament to his publicist's skill.[UWSL]Musk just makes everyone around him feel special so he became successful using this "Engineer" label to catapult to a [/UWSL][UWSL]monolithic sized man. And like you said, he's also got a good publicist.[/UWSL]
Yes I understand your analogy...He isn't. He just has a great publicist that helped him build his public image as one. The average person thinks he's a genius on par with Newton and Tesla.
I'm interested to know - Like whom? Who do you feel fits this title or "coin land on its side" type of stature?Genius is when that coin does land on its side.
Yeah very true.Which is very funny, because he's not an engineer. That's a testament to his publicist's skill.
What qualifies as genius to me is someone who, not only is a polymath, but who both contributes to multiple fields and whose thinking is (obviously) unique, which puts them in a league of their own for their generation or time period. In the scientific world there are three examples that stand out to me. Leonardo Da Vinci, Isaac Newton, and Nikola Tesla.I'm interested to know - Like whom? Who do you feel fits this title or "coin land on its side" type of stature?
I agree in general with what all you said. I think to apply the term of brilliance or genius one needs to contribute to both a humanities field and a hard science field in some way or the other but..What qualifies as genius to me is someone who, not only is a polymath, but who both contributes to multiple fields and whose thinking is (obviously) unique, which puts them in a league of their own for their generation or time period. In the scientific world there are three examples that stand out to me. Leonardo Da Vinci, Isaac Newton, and Nikola Tesla.
Everyone bleeds the sameAnd it doesn't help that nowadays everyone is pushing the "women and men are exactly the same" narrative
[UWSL]I have mainstream Normie cousins.. guys who do exactly what you just described....[/UWSL]This is a fantastic post, lots of good studies, if normies saw this they would use some olympic tier mental gymnastics to claim that its not true.
Women aren't even really people like men, they dont think, analyze, put in effort, and have experiences that span long periods of time. They only live right now, and do whatever feels best for them right now. A woman trying to understand how a man thinks is like a dog trying to understand how Albert Einstein calculated equations. They're just two different things, no way that they can ever be on the same level.
'Very unattractive' women are more likely to be married than other women
Kanazawa, Hu & Larere (2018) conducted an analysis of the The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health data consisting of a "sample of 20,745 adolescents" who were personally interviewed in their homes in four 'waves' ranging from 1994-2008. Only the data of those who participated in all waves and didn't drop out of the study was used for the authors analysis.
The authors analysed the data to find how attractive the participants (that were married or cohabitating) had been at the time of the beginning of their marriage or cohabitation, and used income as a proxy for their intelligence (IQ and income being robustly proven by previous research to be correlated).
The authors concluded that 'very unattractive' women were more likely to be married or cohabitating then merely unattractive or even average to good looking women, and their spouses tended to earn more then their better-looking female counterparts. They infer that intelligent men have a preference to marry or mate with very unattractive women.
Quotes:
- The analyses of the (data) showed that very unattractive women were significantly more likely to be married ...than unattractive women at 29, sometimes more than average-looking women, and their spouses or cohabitation partners earned significantly more than those of unattractive or average-looking women.
- Because both intelligence and physical attractiveness are highly heritable, we would expect their offspring to be simultaneously intelligent and very unattractive.
- Intelligent men’s preference to marry or mate with very unattractive women, if robust, can potentially explain why the correlation between intelligence and physical attractiveness is not larger despite the assortative mating of intelligent men of higher status and physically attractive women over many generations.
References:
- Kanazawa S, Hu S, Larere A. 2018. Why do very unattractive workers earn so much? Economics & Human Biology. 29: 189-197. [Abstract
This is very difficult to pin down in a study. I think that the results are somewhat questionable...Requesting more discussion on why this phenomena occurs. Why are intelligent men more likely to marry unattractive women? Is this because intelligent men themselves are more likely to be unattractive? Or are such men marrying uglier women because of some cost/benefit analysis (less attractive = less stress and demands)?
True. Attractiveness varies a lot once you get INTO the attractive range. I think it's much easier to determine the threshold for what is plainly "ugly".If i post the woman i'm attracted to (she's a politician in my country) most guys here will make fun of me cuz she's not their example of attractiveness, i. e. a young blonde spoiled slut![]()
If i post the woman i'm attracted to (she's a politician in my country) most guys here will make fun of me cuz she's not their example of attractiveness, i. e. a young blonde spoiled slut![]()
@Diocel is it against da rulez?
Is it? I also want to know .....@Diocel is it against da rulez?
Le bluepill think isn't thinking per se but a severe form of delusion kekbluepill thinking is just poor observatory skills, not in position to realization, and specious self-deception. boys often ask what girls find attractive, but there's not truth in the answers. dark triad is will to power, adrenaline push, and position of power.
I don't think women think that money is attractive to males, they just want to betabux Chads.
Le bluepill think isn't thinking per se but a severe form of delusion kek![]()
Men too. Men need to stop simping for foids far from having beautiful faces and bodies. Although I'm not saying simping for Staceys is a good thing, but at least it makes sense.Thank you for reaffirming why I fucking hate women. Females need to do better. These studies show how goddamm immoral they are.