Blackpill A significant portion of bluepill thinking comes assuming that the other gender thinks or behaves like yours

[Deleted member 27161]

Tera level IQ. Bookmarked

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

a gymcelled thread that's not stickied?

 

[JayGoptri]

Elon Musk IQ

I used to think foids liked nice guys, LOL

Elon Musk may not be as "smart" as you think. Certainly he's not a real intellectual.

 

[Deleted member 36342]

Most females nowadays are lit possessed by demonic forces.

 

[based_meme]

Elon Musk may not be as "smart" as you think. Certainly he's not a real intellectual.

He isn't. He just has a great publicist that helped him build his public image as one. The average person thinks he's a genius on par with Newton and Tesla.

 

[Dubious_Company]

Great thread
Men and women will never be able to truly understand eachother (well, unless you are blackpilled)

 

[BornToLose]

Nicely concise and based.

 

[JayGoptri]

He isn't. He just has a great publicist that helped him build his public image as one. The average person thinks he's a genius on par with Newton and Tesla.

Agreed and..[UWSL]I don't know to what extent either man were humanities scholars? Also to call "genius" has become somewhat cliche. I suppose it means they have a lot of their family genes expressed in one person rt? [/UWSL][UWSL]Musk just makes everyone around him feel special so he became successful using this "Engineer" label to catapult to a [/UWSL][UWSL]monolithic sized man. And like you said, he's also got a good publicist.[/UWSL]

 

[Linesnap99]

good to read. contains useful infomation.

 

[based_meme]

Agreed and..[UWSL]I don't know to what extent either man were humanities scholars? Also to call "genius" has become somewhat cliche. I suppose it means they have a lot of their family genes expressed in one person rt? [/UWSL]

Yes, genius is thrown around a lot. True genius is exceptionally rare. I don't think it's purely genetic. It's an important part of it. However, just as a coin is made from silver (or whatever other light metal), that one in some large number time that it lands perfectly on it's edge when tossed has little or nothing to do with the silver it's made from.

Genius is when that coin does land on its side.

[UWSL]Musk just makes everyone around him feel special so he became successful using this "Engineer" label to catapult to a [/UWSL][UWSL]monolithic sized man. And like you said, he's also got a good publicist.[/UWSL]

Which is very funny, because he's not an engineer. That's a testament to his publicist's skill.

 

[investigatorcel]

giga based good read

 

[JayGoptri]

He isn't. He just has a great publicist that helped him build his public image as one. The average person thinks he's a genius on par with Newton and Tesla.

Yes I understand your analogy...

Genius is when that coin does land on its side.

I'm interested to know - Like whom? Who do you feel fits this title or "coin land on its side" type of stature?

Which is very funny, because he's not an engineer. That's a testament to his publicist's skill.

Yeah very true.

 

[Unlucky coalition]

Very true post, i would like to ask that many dudes belive that girls are as horny as they are when thats not true and thats why they can be pickier

 

[based_meme]

I'm interested to know - Like whom? Who do you feel fits this title or "coin land on its side" type of stature?

What qualifies as genius to me is someone who, not only is a polymath, but who both contributes to multiple fields and whose thinking is (obviously) unique, which puts them in a league of their own for their generation or time period. In the scientific world there are three examples that stand out to me. Leonardo Da Vinci, Isaac Newton, and Nikola Tesla.

 

[JayGoptri]

What qualifies as genius to me is someone who, not only is a polymath, but who both contributes to multiple fields and whose thinking is (obviously) unique, which puts them in a league of their own for their generation or time period. In the scientific world there are three examples that stand out to me. Leonardo Da Vinci, Isaac Newton, and Nikola Tesla.

I agree in general with what all you said. I think to apply the term of brilliance or genius one needs to contribute to both a humanities field and a hard science field in some way or the other but..

The problem is that the classical definition of genius is impossible to apply today, I think. Because say for example I feel Telsa and Newton to fit the bill. All the inflated use of Tesla's name (some would say he would have built floating electronic towers and started the cellular era on his own if he was not held back from the forces that be) is exaggerated and bloated. So many Science programs on all the Discovery/History channels always over use "big science" concepts and words so much and we get desensitised (and exaggerate) to them.

 

[Deleted member 35110]

And it doesn't help that nowadays everyone is pushing the "women and men are exactly the same" narrative

Everyone bleeds the same

 

[JayGoptri]

This is a fantastic post, lots of good studies, if normies saw this they would use some olympic tier mental gymnastics to claim that its not true.

Women aren't even really people like men, they dont think, analyze, put in effort, and have experiences that span long periods of time. They only live right now, and do whatever feels best for them right now. A woman trying to understand how a man thinks is like a dog trying to understand how Albert Einstein calculated equations. They're just two different things, no way that they can ever be on the same level.

[UWSL]I have mainstream Normie cousins.. guys who do exactly what you just described....[/UWSL]

Straight up Olympic tier mental gymnastics.., constantly, everyday, all the time to convince themselves that there is no problem. They run away from you when you try to tell them anything real....

 

[IncelWithHate]

'Very unattractive' women are more likely to be married than other women
Kanazawa, Hu & Larere (2018) conducted an analysis of the The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health data consisting of a "sample of 20,745 adolescents" who were personally interviewed in their homes in four 'waves' ranging from 1994-2008. Only the data of those who participated in all waves and didn't drop out of the study was used for the authors analysis.

The authors analysed the data to find how attractive the participants (that were married or cohabitating) had been at the time of the beginning of their marriage or cohabitation, and used income as a proxy for their intelligence (IQ and income being robustly proven by previous research to be correlated).

The authors concluded that 'very unattractive' women were more likely to be married or cohabitating then merely unattractive or even average to good looking women, and their spouses tended to earn more then their better-looking female counterparts. They infer that intelligent men have a preference to marry or mate with very unattractive women.

Quotes:

• The analyses of the (data) showed that very unattractive women were significantly more likely to be married ...than unattractive women at 29, sometimes more than average-looking women, and their spouses or cohabitation partners earned significantly more than those of unattractive or average-looking women.
• Because both intelligence and physical attractiveness are highly heritable, we would expect their offspring to be simultaneously intelligent and very unattractive.
• Intelligent men’s preference to marry or mate with very unattractive women, if robust, can potentially explain why the correlation between intelligence and physical attractiveness is not larger despite the assortative mating of intelligent men of higher status and physically attractive women over many generations.

References:

• Kanazawa S, Hu S, Larere A. 2018. Why do very unattractive workers earn so much? Economics & Human Biology. 29: 189-197. [Abstract

Requesting more discussion on why this phenomena occurs. Why are intelligent men more likely to marry unattractive women? Is this because intelligent men themselves are more likely to be unattractive? Or are such men marrying uglier women because of some cost/benefit analysis (less attractive = less stress and demands)?

 

[JayGoptri]

Requesting more discussion on why this phenomena occurs. Why are intelligent men more likely to marry unattractive women? Is this because intelligent men themselves are more likely to be unattractive? Or are such men marrying uglier women because of some cost/benefit analysis (less attractive = less stress and demands)?

This is very difficult to pin down in a study. I think that the results are somewhat questionable...

There is so much variation in these sort of parameters and one looks in the real observable world and finds examples of attractive women marrying intelligent ment and vice versa (that is, unattractive women also choosing to marrying intelligent men).

Then there are of course the definitions and criteria used for determining what is attractive and unattractive in terms of asthetics and appearance.

Right here on this website we see some men saying curvy body and/or pawg is attractive and others saying "no way". So hard to get a clear picture on all this....

 

[Deleted member 36342]

If i post the woman i'm attracted to (she's a politician in my country) most guys here will make fun of me cuz she's not their example of attractiveness, i. e. a young blonde spoiled slut

 

[JayGoptri]

If i post the woman i'm attracted to (she's a politician in my country) most guys here will make fun of me cuz she's not their example of attractiveness, i. e. a young blonde spoiled slut

True. Attractiveness varies a lot once you get INTO the attractive range. I think it's much easier to determine the threshold for what is plainly "ugly".

Basically, a curvy body, with certain proportions (ex: smaller waist than hips, healthy round buttocks and breasts) will make for an attractive body. The face has set defined features for what make it fall into and outside of the attractive category.

Once you're outside of that range, and the further outside one is, generally the uglier they are.

I would say most of us here are generally outside to well outside of that range for the male face.

 

[BornToLose]

If i post the woman i'm attracted to (she's a politician in my country) most guys here will make fun of me cuz she's not their example of attractiveness, i. e. a young blonde spoiled slut

 

[Deleted member 36342]

View attachment 510163

@Diocel is it against da rulez?

 

[JayGoptri]

@Diocel is it against da rulez?

Is it? I also want to know .....

 

[Deleted member 36342]

Is it? I also want to know .....

 

[MaxZM98]

Thank you for reaffirming why I fucking hate women. Females need to do better. These studies show how goddamm immoral they are.

 

[OwlGod]

bluepill thinking is just poor observatory skills, not in position to realization, and specious self-deception. boys often ask what girls find attractive, but there's not truth in the answers.
Dark Triad is will to power, adrenaline push, and position of power.
I don't think women think that money is attractive to males, they just want to betabux Chads.

 

[Deleted member 36342]

bluepill thinking is just poor observatory skills, not in position to realization, and specious self-deception. boys often ask what girls find attractive, but there's not truth in the answers. dark triad is will to power, adrenaline push, and position of power.
I don't think women think that money is attractive to males, they just want to betabux Chads.

Le bluepill think isn't thinking per se but a severe form of delusion kek

 

[OwlGod]

Le bluepill think isn't thinking per se but a severe form of delusion kek

my delusions were entrenched within reality. ,,Insanity" is an arbitrary label to preclude the unwanted whose intuition is far beyond the norms.
I guess, at least the redpill thinking is as common nowadays, this is good because acknowledge certain aspects of physical attractiveness, however, we need to acknowledge that women are pathological liars and that men who were ,,courageous" and curious enough to ask women what they find attractive will just receive lies. so majority will never grasp it, as they've dishonesty metacognition (if any), and low-sentience overall.

 

[I want to believe]

Thank you for reaffirming why I fucking hate women. Females need to do better. These studies show how goddamm immoral they are.

Men too. Men need to stop simping for foids far from having beautiful faces and bodies. Although I'm not saying simping for Staceys is a good thing, but at least it makes sense.