
WorthlessSlavicShit
There are no happy endings in Eastern Europe.
★★★★★
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2022
- Posts
- 16,688
Damn boyos, seems like the "Women are wonderful," and "Only men do that," beliefs just can't help catching hits, and devastating hits at that
. For context, this is from a 2024 Spanish study on sexual assault and rape in the context of parties and nightlife in general, with an emphasis on it happening due to drugs, alcohol and so on. The study was based on an, admittedly online but supposedly done by a professional company with experience in the field, survey of 1601 people aged 18-35 and living in Spain at the time. Here's the table that sums up all the important results:
www.sciencedirect.com
To sum up the most important findings:
1) While women were much more likely to claim to have been sexually assaulted than men, this difference was basically solely because of them claiming non-invasive sexual assault such as non-consensual fondling, kissing, and so on at much higher rates then men did, with there being barely any differences when it came to more serious (you might even say, "actual") types of sexual assault.
2) Considering that most men probably wouldn't even consider a woman kissing or fondling them without their explicit consent to be any kind of sexual assault, even said difference in less-invasive types of it is questionable.
3) Even despite the number of male perpetrators being inflated like that, most men were still assaulted by women. This is quite important to point out, since I've noticed a tendency from people to overstate the amount of male sexual assault/rape done by other men by focusing on more men usually being found to be perpetrators than women, not mentioning anything else and leaving people to assume that this larger amount of male perpetrators is relatively equally spread across genders. Studies like this show why that's bullshit.
Overall, it seems that there were about 3-4 times as many male perpetrators as female ones, with women reporting sexual assault almost three times as often as men, mostly due to counting stuff like fondling and kissing and whatnot, and with over 91% of the perpetrators assaulting women being sole men and 33% of the ones assaulting men being so. And yet, still, almost 60% of men were assaulted by sole women, and more than that if we are talking about multiple women.
4) That brings me to the craziest finding in the entire study, the one I've mentioned in the title and the reason why I'm making this thread in the first place. Yes, gang rapes done by multiple women against a man are something that actually exists and happens. I've made a few threads on that already, but none really flat out stated it like this.
This one:
incels.is
Looked at a lot of such attacks, but the way it was written it could've been misconstrued as being mostly about sexual abuse of children, while this one:
incels.is
Was about fantasies, intent, and so on, but not about actual actions.
AFAIK, this is the first study I know of where there's a direct comparison of rapes/sexual assaults of adults by a group of people of the opposite sex, and what a comparison it is
. Of all DFSA perpetrated against women, 23 incidents were done by multiple men. Of all DFSA perpetrated against men, 10 incidents were done by multiple women. Literally just a few incidents away from a perfect 2:1 ratio, and remember, the researchers specifically pointed out that serious DFSA was basically equal, so I doubt that this was just propped up by stuff like multiple women kissing some dude on the cheeks or something. Everything seems to suggest that those incidents would've been similarly severe regardless of the gender combination there.
And then, we look at the percentages, with, as already mentioned in one of those parts I quoted, 6.2% of sexual assaults done to women being done by multiple men, and 5% of sexual assaults done to men being done by multiple women. Literally just a bit over a one percentage point difference
. The total amounts might've been different a bit for the two genders, but when a rape/sexual assault happened, there was an almost equal chance of it being a gang rape done by multiple people of the opposite sex for both men and women.
5) As is also shown on the table, when men were sexually assaulted, they were more likely to at the time be under the influence of all types of drugs the researchers have mentioned there, including the "rape drugs" and so on, which is just a nice cherry on top here. Maybe lower total numbers, but when it happened, men were more likely to go through a drugged rape scenario and basically an identical chance to be raped by multiple people of the opposite sex as women had. Also, more likely to say they took the drugs involuntarily.
Now, it's true that the study emphasizes that for both genders, non-heterosexuals are at a much greater risk of DFSA
However, there's still no getting around women committing 60%+ of DFSA against men, which means that either there's a crapload of women committing "corrective rape" against gay guys, or faggots focus on raping other faggots and straight women focus on raping straight men (which is something other studies, such as this one, seem to be suggesting), which is a similar debate to what I talked about above where people try to take the raw numbers of male perpetrators to make it seem that there's more of them attacking other men than there truly are, and given the mindset of the average person who talks about "rape culture" being a patriarchal construct and rape being men's weapon against women or whatever, neither of those two possibilities are something they would like to be true
.
Half of young women and one-quarter of young men had experienced drug-facilitated sexual assault in their lifetime. Female victimisation due to touching and kissing was notably high, whereas men comprised almost half of the victims of more invasive DFSA experiences involving masturbation, penetration, and oral sex.
The likelihood of experiencing any form of DFSA was 2.78 times higher among women than among men (P < 0.001) [Table 4]. However, no significant differences were observed based on gender concerning more invasive DFSA.
In women, the assailant was a lone man in 91.4% of incidents, whereas 6.2% involved group assault by several men. This profile was different among male victims, where a lone woman perpetrated most of the DFSA cases against men (57.2%) (P < 0.001) and group assault cases against men perpetrated by several women peaked at 5.0% (P < 0.001)

Drug-facilitated sexual assault in youth nightlife contexts in Spain
This study aimed to provide epidemiological information on drug-facilitated sexual assault in Spanish youth partying, with a focus on prevalence rates…
To sum up the most important findings:
1) While women were much more likely to claim to have been sexually assaulted than men, this difference was basically solely because of them claiming non-invasive sexual assault such as non-consensual fondling, kissing, and so on at much higher rates then men did, with there being barely any differences when it came to more serious (you might even say, "actual") types of sexual assault.
2) Considering that most men probably wouldn't even consider a woman kissing or fondling them without their explicit consent to be any kind of sexual assault, even said difference in less-invasive types of it is questionable.
3) Even despite the number of male perpetrators being inflated like that, most men were still assaulted by women. This is quite important to point out, since I've noticed a tendency from people to overstate the amount of male sexual assault/rape done by other men by focusing on more men usually being found to be perpetrators than women, not mentioning anything else and leaving people to assume that this larger amount of male perpetrators is relatively equally spread across genders. Studies like this show why that's bullshit.
Overall, it seems that there were about 3-4 times as many male perpetrators as female ones, with women reporting sexual assault almost three times as often as men, mostly due to counting stuff like fondling and kissing and whatnot, and with over 91% of the perpetrators assaulting women being sole men and 33% of the ones assaulting men being so. And yet, still, almost 60% of men were assaulted by sole women, and more than that if we are talking about multiple women.
4) That brings me to the craziest finding in the entire study, the one I've mentioned in the title and the reason why I'm making this thread in the first place. Yes, gang rapes done by multiple women against a man are something that actually exists and happens. I've made a few threads on that already, but none really flat out stated it like this.
This one:

[Two studies] Women frequently participate in gang rapes as perpetrators, and in the US, there's a gang rape done just by women every 3 days
This is something I've discovered some time ago, at first seeing it as just another random study I found before realizing just how crazy it actually was, and now, with the kind of stuff talked about on the internet: View: https://twitter.com/Cooperstreaming/status/1786682681197216119#m...

Looked at a lot of such attacks, but the way it was written it could've been misconstrued as being mostly about sexual abuse of children, while this one:

(March 2025 study) 37% of women show at least some interest in gang rape perpetration
Title:worryfeels::shock:. Exploring Correlates of Multiple Perpetrator Rape Proclivity in Women As you can see, this is a very recent study, but quite an interesting one, if only because of the topic. Almost no one had bothered to look at how interested women are in perpetrating rape with...

Was about fantasies, intent, and so on, but not about actual actions.
AFAIK, this is the first study I know of where there's a direct comparison of rapes/sexual assaults of adults by a group of people of the opposite sex, and what a comparison it is
And then, we look at the percentages, with, as already mentioned in one of those parts I quoted, 6.2% of sexual assaults done to women being done by multiple men, and 5% of sexual assaults done to men being done by multiple women. Literally just a bit over a one percentage point difference
5) As is also shown on the table, when men were sexually assaulted, they were more likely to at the time be under the influence of all types of drugs the researchers have mentioned there, including the "rape drugs" and so on, which is just a nice cherry on top here. Maybe lower total numbers, but when it happened, men were more likely to go through a drugged rape scenario and basically an identical chance to be raped by multiple people of the opposite sex as women had. Also, more likely to say they took the drugs involuntarily.
Now, it's true that the study emphasizes that for both genders, non-heterosexuals are at a much greater risk of DFSA
However, there's still no getting around women committing 60%+ of DFSA against men, which means that either there's a crapload of women committing "corrective rape" against gay guys, or faggots focus on raping other faggots and straight women focus on raping straight men (which is something other studies, such as this one, seem to be suggesting), which is a similar debate to what I talked about above where people try to take the raw numbers of male perpetrators to make it seem that there's more of them attacking other men than there truly are, and given the mindset of the average person who talks about "rape culture" being a patriarchal construct and rape being men's weapon against women or whatever, neither of those two possibilities are something they would like to be true
@Regenerator @Mecoja @Stupid Clown @Sewer Sloth @Sergeant Kelly @To koniec @reveries @veryrare @LeFrenchCel @Uggo Mongo @PersonalityChad @GeckoBus @Lazyandtalentless @weaselbomber @ItsovERfucks @Grodd @Epedaphic @Wumbus @The Judge @KillNiggers @Anarcho Nihilist @FuckYou @Oneitiscel @Kamanbert @Julius1 @Mrocznykichajnik @tulasdanslos