Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill (2024 Spanish study) A 2:1 ratio of gang rapes done by men and women respectively at parties, and no real difference in percentage terms

WorthlessSlavicShit

WorthlessSlavicShit

There are no happy endings in Eastern Europe.
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 30, 2022
Posts
16,688
Damn boyos, seems like the "Women are wonderful," and "Only men do that," beliefs just can't help catching hits, and devastating hits at that:shock:. For context, this is from a 2024 Spanish study on sexual assault and rape in the context of parties and nightlife in general, with an emphasis on it happening due to drugs, alcohol and so on. The study was based on an, admittedly online but supposedly done by a professional company with experience in the field, survey of 1601 people aged 18-35 and living in Spain at the time. Here's the table that sums up all the important results:

1751474383685


Half of young women and one-quarter of young men had experienced drug-facilitated sexual assault in their lifetime. Female victimisation due to touching and kissing was notably high, whereas men comprised almost half of the victims of more invasive DFSA experiences involving masturbation, penetration, and oral sex.
The likelihood of experiencing any form of DFSA was 2.78 times higher among women than among men (P < 0.001) [Table 4]. However, no significant differences were observed based on gender concerning more invasive DFSA.
In women, the assailant was a lone man in 91.4% of incidents, whereas 6.2% involved group assault by several men. This profile was different among male victims, where a lone woman perpetrated most of the DFSA cases against men (57.2%) (P < 0.001) and group assault cases against men perpetrated by several women peaked at 5.0% (P < 0.001)


To sum up the most important findings:

1) While women were much more likely to claim to have been sexually assaulted than men, this difference was basically solely because of them claiming non-invasive sexual assault such as non-consensual fondling, kissing, and so on at much higher rates then men did, with there being barely any differences when it came to more serious (you might even say, "actual") types of sexual assault.

2) Considering that most men probably wouldn't even consider a woman kissing or fondling them without their explicit consent to be any kind of sexual assault, even said difference in less-invasive types of it is questionable.

3) Even despite the number of male perpetrators being inflated like that, most men were still assaulted by women. This is quite important to point out, since I've noticed a tendency from people to overstate the amount of male sexual assault/rape done by other men by focusing on more men usually being found to be perpetrators than women, not mentioning anything else and leaving people to assume that this larger amount of male perpetrators is relatively equally spread across genders. Studies like this show why that's bullshit.

Overall, it seems that there were about 3-4 times as many male perpetrators as female ones, with women reporting sexual assault almost three times as often as men, mostly due to counting stuff like fondling and kissing and whatnot, and with over 91% of the perpetrators assaulting women being sole men and 33% of the ones assaulting men being so. And yet, still, almost 60% of men were assaulted by sole women, and more than that if we are talking about multiple women.

4) That brings me to the craziest finding in the entire study, the one I've mentioned in the title and the reason why I'm making this thread in the first place. Yes, gang rapes done by multiple women against a man are something that actually exists and happens. I've made a few threads on that already, but none really flat out stated it like this.

This one:


Looked at a lot of such attacks, but the way it was written it could've been misconstrued as being mostly about sexual abuse of children, while this one:


Was about fantasies, intent, and so on, but not about actual actions.

AFAIK, this is the first study I know of where there's a direct comparison of rapes/sexual assaults of adults by a group of people of the opposite sex, and what a comparison it is:shock:. Of all DFSA perpetrated against women, 23 incidents were done by multiple men. Of all DFSA perpetrated against men, 10 incidents were done by multiple women. Literally just a few incidents away from a perfect 2:1 ratio, and remember, the researchers specifically pointed out that serious DFSA was basically equal, so I doubt that this was just propped up by stuff like multiple women kissing some dude on the cheeks or something. Everything seems to suggest that those incidents would've been similarly severe regardless of the gender combination there.

And then, we look at the percentages, with, as already mentioned in one of those parts I quoted, 6.2% of sexual assaults done to women being done by multiple men, and 5% of sexual assaults done to men being done by multiple women. Literally just a bit over a one percentage point difference:feelskek:. The total amounts might've been different a bit for the two genders, but when a rape/sexual assault happened, there was an almost equal chance of it being a gang rape done by multiple people of the opposite sex for both men and women.

5) As is also shown on the table, when men were sexually assaulted, they were more likely to at the time be under the influence of all types of drugs the researchers have mentioned there, including the "rape drugs" and so on, which is just a nice cherry on top here. Maybe lower total numbers, but when it happened, men were more likely to go through a drugged rape scenario and basically an identical chance to be raped by multiple people of the opposite sex as women had. Also, more likely to say they took the drugs involuntarily.

Now, it's true that the study emphasizes that for both genders, non-heterosexuals are at a much greater risk of DFSA

1751556217085


However, there's still no getting around women committing 60%+ of DFSA against men, which means that either there's a crapload of women committing "corrective rape" against gay guys, or faggots focus on raping other faggots and straight women focus on raping straight men (which is something other studies, such as this one, seem to be suggesting), which is a similar debate to what I talked about above where people try to take the raw numbers of male perpetrators to make it seem that there's more of them attacking other men than there truly are, and given the mindset of the average person who talks about "rape culture" being a patriarchal construct and rape being men's weapon against women or whatever, neither of those two possibilities are something they would like to be true:feelshaha::feelsthink:.

@Regenerator @Mecoja @Stupid Clown @Sewer Sloth @Sergeant Kelly @To koniec @reveries @veryrare @LeFrenchCel @Uggo Mongo @PersonalityChad @GeckoBus @Lazyandtalentless @weaselbomber @ItsovERfucks @Grodd @Epedaphic @Wumbus @The Judge @KillNiggers @Anarcho Nihilist @FuckYou @Oneitiscel @Kamanbert @Julius1 @Mrocznykichajnik @tulasdanslos
 
Vaas far cry3

the data is here yet it'd take several generations to take down the narrative of women being innocent and never doing anything bad
 
women only don't get the predator tag cause they consider 99% of males subhuman the're sex addicts for Chad
 
Another banger, yea women are very non-chalant when you speak of how dangerous rapes are(testing) and this are I have noticed it, they just use rapes to get more rights and perks and with this study and many other anecdotes it's no doubt that they actively do rapes as well if opportunity arises multiple women are known to jump on a man and demanding sexual penetration
 
jeez... what the hell is up with Spanish bitches?! all I know is... I'd choose the bear over Spanish women! ;)
 
good find man. @Fat Link this should be pinned or put in must-read.
 
DNR.
still will pump it to must-read
 
Nooo this can't be muh women are le innocent angels :soy::foidSoy:

Tagging spanishcel @Rapistcel
 
Good thread, society will never acknowledge this tho of course. Goes against their narrative of them thinking foids are innocent angels
 
No wonder they get graped so often. This is how 50% of the country looks like right now
 
How does a woman "rape" someone? Is she using a strap-on and roofies?
 
Spain's feminist government won't complain about this will they?
 
View attachment 1478890
the data is here yet it'd take several generations to take down the narrative of women being innocent and never doing anything bad
True, unfortunately. Still, it's nice that we have data like this which we can use and highlight whenever we need:hax:.

good find man. @Fat Link this should be pinned or put in must-read.
Thanks boyos:feelsYall:.

It says that half of foids have been victims of sexual abuse, I can't believe a word of that.
Yeah, as the study itself points out, that's mostly from "less invasive" stuff like nonconsensual kissing, fondling and so on, which all technically qualify as sexual abuse. The more invasive stuff most people would actually call sexual abuse is much rarer, as the second table there shows.
 
Of course it's fucking spain

Spain's feminist government won't complain about this will they?
Fuck Irene Montero, she's an actual psychopath, if she were a man, she'd be quartered and hanged by a mob in madrid
 
5) As is also shown on the table, when men were sexually assaulted, they were more likely to at the time be under the influence of all types of drugs the researchers have mentioned there, including the "rape drugs" and so on, which is just a nice cherry on top here.
this part, lmfao - thats why foids always go on about their drinks being spiked and "stay safe out there girl" etc - projection. Always fucking projection. Bitches are putting roofies in chads drink and then gang raping him. Btw, this archetype is already present in the bible. After Soddom and Gomorrah get nuked from orbit, Lots daughters drug him with alcohol and then rape him.

30 Lot and his two daughters left Zoar and settled in the mountains, for he was afraid to stay in Zoar. He and his two daughters lived in a cave.
31 One day the older daughter said to the younger, “Our father is old, and there is no man around here to give us children—as is the custom all over the earth.

32 Let’s get our father to drink wine and then sleep with him and preserve our family line through our father.”
33 That night they got their father to drink wine, and the older daughter went in and slept with him. He was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.

34 The next day the older daughter said to the younger, “Last night I slept with my father. Let’s get him to drink wine again tonight, and you go in and sleep with him so we can preserve our family line through our father.”
35 So they got their father to drink wine that night also, and the younger daughter went in and slept with him. Again he was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.

36 So both of Lot’s daughters became pregnant by their father.
37 The older daughter had a son, and she named him Moab[a]; he is the father of the Moabites of today. 38 The younger daughter also had a son, and she named him Ben-Ammi[b]; he is the father of the Ammonites[c] of today.

So yeah, great thread boyo :feelsautistic::feelsautistic::feelsautistic: If you excluded all the dumb shit women count as rape and you included all the men who probably dont speak up after being raped by women, I would say its 50/50 at least. Again, the whole women are less sexual than man, less violent, natural nestmakers, confrontation avoidant etc - all bs.
 
Nice findings. :feelshehe: If female victimhood was put into a real and honest perspective, il wouldn't be allowed to act as an ideological mythology that intellectually terrorizes men and holds society hostage. It's sad that the voice of reason is reduced to echo on obscure incel forums.
 
Last edited:
SA and Grape are the most infuriating statements ever. Bunch of stupid foids complaining over being able to get laid so easily without a Chad
 
It says that half of foids have been victims of sexual abuse, I can't believe a word of that.
Teniendo en cuenta que abuso sexual es que se les acerque cualquiera que no sea un Chad, puede ser cierto...
 
Men don't see women as a threat, ever. They're always infantilised.
 
I live in Spain, and I know that probably the majority of rape committed by men were done by illegal immigrants from Africa. It's a rising problem here.
 
This is a really good find. Feminists will never admit this because it undermines their entire worldview, but the worst thing is that they will continue to push biased statistics to vilify men.
 
If you want to seethe with rage, read about this law she passed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ley_del_solo_sí_es_sí#Sentencing_controversy
It freed rapists from prisoned and classified approaching women without consent on the same level as rape. You're rewarded if you're a chad rapist but punished if you're ugly or akward around women. The logical end goal of feminism
Wtf:feelskek::shock:?

this part, lmfao - thats why foids always go on about their drinks being spiked and "stay safe out there girl" etc - projection. Always fucking projection. Bitches are putting roofies in chads drink and then gang raping him. Btw, this archetype is already present in the bible. After Soddom and Gomorrah get nuked from orbit, Lots daughters drug him with alcohol and then rape him.




So yeah, great thread boyo :feelsautistic::feelsautistic::feelsautistic: If you excluded all the dumb shit women count as rape and you included all the men who probably dont speak up after being raped by women, I would say its 50/50 at least. Again, the whole women are less sexual than man, less violent, natural nestmakers, confrontation avoidant etc - all bs.
Thanks. Yeah, that's another thing they found in the study I linked here:

faggots focus on raping other faggots and straight women focus on raping straight men (which is something other studies, such as this one, seem to be suggesting)
They looked at cases of victimization of straight and bisexual men, and while bisexual men were much more likely to be assaulted purely using physical force, when it came to victimization through intoxication and physical force together, there were no real differences between the two groups. I've posted here multiple studies which found insignificant differences between men and women being sexually assaulted through physical force even when they only looked at heterosexual victimization, but even if we accept that, OK, men are much more likely to use force, stuff like this clearly shows that whenever women can neutralize men's advantage there then they take it, and even if men attack women more than vice versa, then it's not because women are inherently better, but clearly just and only because men's physical strength intimidates them.

Nice findings. :feelshehe: If female victimhood was put into a real and honest perspective, il wouldn't be allowed to act as an ideological mythology that intellectually terrorizes men and holds society hostage. It's sad that the voice of reason is reduced to echo on obscure incel forums.
Thanks:yes::yes:.

Men don't see women as a threat, ever. They're always infantilised.
Exactly. It's insane really when you think about it, and yet, it's constantly fed to us through media, even IRL people just have a tendency to reframe past events to make women seem less threatening, evil and so on.

This is a really good find. Feminists will never admit this because it undermines their entire worldview, but the worst thing is that they will continue to push biased statistics to vilify men.
Yup. This study has like one citation so far, and that's in a Spanish-language journal. Stuff like this isn't about to be talked about unless we somehow manage to push it in front of normies, and possibly not even then.
 
Exactly. It's insane really when you think about it, and yet, it's constantly fed to us through media, even IRL people just have a tendency to reframe past events to make women seem less threatening, evil and so on
Yeah, bullshit like if women led the world, we would be living in paradise. Foids in power are often more ruthless and worse than men. Like female German soldiers during WW2.
 

Similar threads

AdExpress
Replies
6
Views
459
The Scarlet Prince
The Scarlet Prince
WeirdoDesperado
Replies
7
Views
686
erenyeager
erenyeager
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
6
Views
383
Shay Patrick Cormac
Shay Patrick Cormac
WorthlessSlavicShit
Replies
21
Views
1K
DarkStar
DarkStar

Users who are viewing this thread

  • moofedBySoyciety
  • Genetically Doomed
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top