Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel Zizek being bluepilled on Incels

  • Thread starter Deleted member 23656
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 23656

Self-banned
-
Joined
Dec 25, 2019
Posts
4,137
Jco6jsbh16f41

I'm disappointed. I expected more from the man.
 
is that a kobo h2o?
 
cucked feminist
 
I think he's getting incels mixed up with doomer Jordan Peterson dickriders.
 
I just watched his program with the bbc disgusting femshit
and he was good at the debate, thats all i know about him tbh
He's an egomaniac tradcuck shill. But whatever I don't even know why I brought it up. He's wholly unimportant to me and you can like him if you want.
 
Nice nail polish, faggot.
 
exactly what i expected from a marxists
 
Last edited:
just what i expect from a marxists
Communism says workers deserve their fair rights of wealth. But when it comes to female dating they go full capitalist lol.

Communism would be a lot nicer if it didn't appeal to foids and faggots
 
Why are you surprised? Zizek is a basic bitch philosopher.
 
Not bluepilled at all.

Well probably he is, but it has nothing to do with the text. He just describes the contradiction in the predominant ideology here.
 
This clown begins his argument by strawmanning all incels into the label of "white supremacists," when that's demonstrably false as the majority of incels are ethnic.
And the entire thing boils down to "have sex," so the only appropriate response is "dilate tranny."
 
Isn't he a commie? No wonder he's retarded
 
So i guess currycels . ricecels. peanutbuttercels. kebabcels. Tacocels are all self hating whites according to this imbecile...
 
Some high IQ posts from 4chan.

Firstly, sexual competition is zero sum. Attractiveness is relative. You are only attractive if you are more attractive than others. Therefore winners create losers. This isn't how other resources work. Hunger, for example, is absolute. How hungry you are is independent of how much food other people have. Some people being fat doesn't magically cause everyone else to starve.

We can therefore divide all resources into two classes on this basis, "absolute resources" and "relative resources" depending which behaviour they obey.
Communism is a position people arrive at under the (potentially implict) assumption that all resources are relative resources and all resource competition is zero sum. Laissez-Faire capitalism is a position people arrive at under the (potentiall implicit) assumption that all resources are absolute resources and all resource competition is finite sum.

Supporting "communist" like policies for relative resources and opposing it for absolute resources is not hypocrisy nor is it a double standard.

This seems like a totally idiotic thing to say.

It conflates monogamy (which has been historically near universal in Europe) with forced distribution of females, as if one thing was just a more soft version of the other, which is just false.
Then it portrays monogamy and hierarchical structures as some kind of conflict, which neither historically nor in reality ever existed.

This is just a ridiculous argument to make and totally nonsensical beyond even a surface investigation.

Utilitarian: Communism is bad because it doesn't work. Polygamy/Hypergamy are bad because they don't work as well.
Zero contradition.
 


Some DUMBFUCK reported me coz he seriously thought I was that tranny/foid or whatever in this pic

Use your fucking brains moron! Jesus Christ!
 

Similar threads

X
Replies
10
Views
726
Fluoxymesterone
Fluoxymesterone
Stupid Clown
Replies
8
Views
424
14Kaiser
14Kaiser
D
Replies
64
Views
2K
TouhouMathcel
TouhouMathcel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top