Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

You can't truly be a Christian and fully be an incel at the same time (and why I disagree with Maslow's hierarchy of needs) or, surfing the Kali Yuga

aesthetic_recon

aesthetic_recon

卐 SATOKOCEL 卐 | IQ -4 STD | MOG KING OF INCELS.IS
-
Joined
Jun 8, 2020
Posts
1,861
Casual sex and love is what we all desire. This is in obvious conflict with Christianity, which teaches the only acceptable expression of sexuality is in marriage. The majority of people on this forum do not care if love & sex is expressed within the confines of marriage; however, even if you desire and only will have sex within the societal institution of marriage, my point still stands. Let me explain...

Christianity taught us to hate the body and the flesh. Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 9 that he "beats his body into submission every day." There is a radical disdain for casual sex (or really any expression of sexuality) in the Bible. Despite the Old Testament being replete with examples of sexual misbehavior (curiously, the OT does not outright condemn acting up sexually in many cases--it's either implicitly understood to be wrong or obliquely criticized. If not criticized, it sometimes is strangely praised. To give an example: Lot's daughters get him drunk and seduce him, which you would expect to morally implicate Lot, but in one of the Petrine letters Lot is described positively as "righteous."), Christianity consistently tells us to "keep it in your pants" and orient your eyes towards the things of heaven. Compare this to blackpilled inceldom, where reciprocal love and sex with a female is the highest goal in life, not apokatastasis or union with God (which is, admittedly, an admirable if not frustratingly difficult goal to achieve given bodily/fleshly desires and impulses). A failure to obtain this singular goal humanity, mutual love with a woman, is often ascribed as chief cause of post-pubescent suffering.[1] (There is an argument to be made for Maslow's hierarchy of needs, that to achieve higher-order transcendental bliss you first have to meet your base needs. This thesis, however, is disputable as many great artists have been fueled by sexual & other insecurities--Kafka is a good example of this. Insecurity often turns otherwise complacent men into great ones--fantastic artists, bold leaders, men-against-time, etc. So, the emphasis on "getting sex" before you can do something great is a thesis I find highly disputable. But I digress.) Christianity teaches us to hate our bodily impulses of union with woman (think of injunctives against lusting after any woman, etc.), except through marriage with ONE woman, while inceldom teaches us sex with wom(a/e)n is a natural desire in every man--in other words, Christianity hates the body, inceldom loves it. But what of the incels who only want to have sex with one woman in their life? Aren't they fully incels too?

I find it impossible for any pious Christian to be fully incel, truly blackpilled; for this to happen, you have to acknowledge certain realities about sex, modern dating, biology, and life, and their relation to their antithesis: death. To be fully-incel is to recognize certain immutable biological truths about modern life, sex, but most importantly, BIOLOGY. The aggregation of 90% of women to the top 5% of men is a consequence of BIOLOGY instantiated and gifted to individual consciousnesses by Nature. Full-inceldom, correctly called "being blackpilled," is acknowledging and coming to accept this truth. That BIOLOGY overdetermines you is a fact equally liberating as it is terrifying. You see threads on here constantly complaining about a variety of issues, from IQ to facial structure to autisticesque behaviors. So what's the common denominator in all of these problems? BIOLOGY as given to us by Nature. Man is a creature of the animal kingdom. Acknowledging that every man wants to have sex with multiple women he finds attractive is a basic axiom for being blackpilled, a fact so basic in the animal kingdoms that it doesn't even need to be said. Males want to have sex with multiple hot females across all species of living creature.

BIOLOGY (& its byproduct, history) also overdetermines and constrains what you believe at all levels, including religion. To pretend that religion is somehow isolated from the rest of biological and historical impulses is an incredible fallacy. Nature and historical happenstance overdetermine what you believe--you're only a Christian because a small Judaic cult pioneered by the apostle Paul dominated the western world by pure chance. It's not an accident incels are so similar to one another in belief. Our common biological aberrations and societal mistreatment shape how we view other people, religion, and society at large.

But biology is not the root cause of everything; Nature is. The chthonic power we call Nature has always subjected everything under "her" control. Nothing is not bound by Nature: Nature-as-God is the last blackpill, the ultimate freeing realization that everything is cyclical, everything under Nature's dominion--even the god(s) we worship: the pagan Gods of Greco-Roman religious cultures were always nature-personified, byproducts of nature, or somehow subjected to nature. Nature always has the final say. Contrasted to Christianity which posits a God outside of time and nature, not only above it but absolutely above it, Nature is viewed as something created by an all-powerful aseitic God, not the final power we answer to. This is the opposite of the blackpill. This puts the emphasis on humanity instead of Nature. Nature either endows you with the ability to procreate, to continue a species lineage millions of years old, or it doesn't. (And in our case, we fall in the latter camp.) This is the terrifying reality of the blackpill, that you aren't in control, that time is cyclical, that humanity is stuck in a time-loop of destruction and life. The history of humanity is a blip in a larger cosmic drama of rebirth and dissolution. "Surfing the Kali Yuga" is being able to manipulate this fact to your advantage. To those who are able to do so, I say: Godspeed, soldier. You have nothing to lose but your chains. To the rest of us who can't, for whatever psychological or biological reason, know this: you were never in control to begin with. It's always been Nature.

Let those who have ears, hear.


Footnotes

[1] In the common sense normie narrative of Elliot Rodger's life, he is depicted as a virulent misogynist who only hates women; this, however, is not true. He equally ascribes the same blame, if not more, against men in his life who bullied him. Proof of this point: He opens his manifesto calling out humanity as the chief cause of his suffering, not just women. Many men are described negatively and with abject hatred; so the thesis he "just" hated women and was a MGTOW pro-man misogynist is a false one.
 
beyond retarded title dnr
 
obviously you can't be incel and a christian, in the christian bible it says that you should not be alone.
 
Christian = evil and cuck for Chad
 
You are a special kind of retard if you are incel and still love God that prepared this awful fate for you, if he exists he should be your enemy number one that need to get neutralized asap.
 
@Eremetic I need some high iq niggas in here boosting this. Give me your thoughts please.
 
Christianity taught us to hate the body and the flesh.
this is wrong. Christians really teach to love their own bodies. Christians don't like casual sex cuz it can lead to all sorts of things, namely unwanted pregnancy. ALso the type of people engaged with casual sex are not very good people to begin with; they are lead by emotions and impulsiveness, which is the opposite of religious discipline
 
Last edited:
1 Corinthians 9:27 and Romans 7:18 disprove your statement.
sure it's in the bible. but do you seriously think your average normie Christian don't cherry pick parts from the bible and interpret their own way to reaffirm their own already preexisting worldview? you must not meet a lot christians i bet.
 
sure it's in the bible. but do you seriously think your average normie Christian don't cherry pick parts from the bible and interpret their own way to reaffirm their own already preexisting worldview? you must not meet a lot christians i bet.
Unfortunately I do know a lot of them. I was making a statement about the intrinsic nature of Christianity compared to the intrinsic nature of the blackpill, not how Christians act in practice.
 
Here's a less convoluted and more simplified reason why incels can't be Christians:
1. God made you ugly.
2. You wanna worship a God that made you an ugly fuck?
yeah lol
 
God is real tho being lonely is normal as a Christian god asks Christians to not be like the world
 
Lots of wrong assumptions were made here to reach these conclusions.
  • Marriage has been corrupted and weaponized against men. It no longer resembles the marriage described in the Bible;
  • In the past, people married a lot earlier and there was no contraception, so waiting until marriage made sense. This is no longer the case and even the churches have moved away from enforcing this;
  • Christianity teaches control of our sexual impulses, otherwise society would be inviable. We are living in a time where foids don't practice this and look at the shitshow;
  • Maslow hierarchy of needs is about having a happy fulfilling life. Not completing it doesn't mean you won't do something great, just means you won't feel happiness.
Ultimately, Christianity and all other religions are about social engineering and imprinting good values and morals into the masses of people to achieve a viable society.
 
Casual sex and love is what we all desire. This is in obvious conflict with Christianity, which teaches the only acceptable expression of sexuality is in marriage. The majority of people on this forum do not care if love & sex is expressed within the confines of marriage; however, even if you desire and only will have sex within the societal institution of marriage, my point still stands. Let me explain...

Christianity taught us to hate the body and the flesh. Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 9 that he "beats his body into submission every day." There is a radical disdain for casual sex (or really any expression of sexuality) in the Bible. Despite the Old Testament being replete with examples of sexual misbehavior (curiously, the OT does not outright condemn acting up sexually in many cases--it's either implicitly understood to be wrong or obliquely criticized. If not criticized, it sometimes is strangely praised. To give an example: Lot's daughters get him drunk and seduce him, which you would expect to morally implicate Lot, but in one of the Petrine letters Lot is described positively as "righteous."), Christianity consistently tells us to "keep it in your pants" and orient your eyes towards the things of heaven. Compare this to blackpilled inceldom, where reciprocal love and sex with a female is the highest goal in life, not apokatastasis or union with God (which is, admittedly, an admirable if not frustratingly difficult goal to achieve given bodily/fleshly desires and impulses). A failure to obtain this singular goal humanity, mutual love with a woman, is often ascribed as chief cause of post-pubescent suffering.[1] (There is an argument to be made for Maslow's hierarchy of needs, that to achieve higher-order transcendental bliss you first have to meet your base needs. This thesis, however, is disputable as many great artists have been fueled by sexual & other insecurities--Kafka is a good example of this. Insecurity often turns otherwise complacent men into great ones--fantastic artists, bold leaders, men-against-time, etc. So, the emphasis on "getting sex" before you can do something great is a thesis I find highly disputable. But I digress.) Christianity teaches us to hate our bodily impulses of union with woman (think of injunctives against lusting after any woman, etc.), except through marriage with ONE woman, while inceldom teaches us sex with wom(a/e)n is a natural desire in every man--in other words, Christianity hates the body, inceldom loves it. But what of the incels who only want to have sex with one woman in their life? Aren't they fully incels too?

I find it impossible for any pious Christian to be fully incel, truly blackpilled; for this to happen, you have to acknowledge certain realities about sex, modern dating, biology, and life, and their relation to their antithesis: death. To be fully-incel is to recognize certain immutable biological truths about modern life, sex, but most importantly, BIOLOGY. The aggregation of 90% of women to the top 5% of men is a consequence of BIOLOGY instantiated and gifted to individual consciousnesses by Nature. Full-inceldom, correctly called "being blackpilled," is acknowledging and coming to accept this truth. That BIOLOGY overdetermines you is a fact equally liberating as it is terrifying. You see threads on here constantly complaining about a variety of issues, from IQ to facial structure to autisticesque behaviors. So what's the common denominator in all of these problems? BIOLOGY as given to us by Nature. Man is a creature of the animal kingdom. Acknowledging that every man wants to have sex with multiple women he finds attractive is a basic axiom for being blackpilled, a fact so basic in the animal kingdoms that it doesn't even need to be said. Males want to have sex with multiple hot females across all species of living creature.

BIOLOGY (& its byproduct, history) also overdetermines and constrains what you believe at all levels, including religion. To pretend that religion is somehow isolated from the rest of biological and historical impulses is an incredible fallacy. Nature and historical happenstance overdetermine what you believe--you're only a Christian because a small Judaic cult pioneered by the apostle Paul dominated the western world by pure chance. It's not an accident incels are so similar to one another in belief. Our common biological aberrations and societal mistreatment shape how we view other people, religion, and society at large.

But biology is not the root cause of everything; Nature is. The chthonic power we call Nature has always subjected everything under "her" control. Nothing is not bound by Nature: Nature-as-God is the last blackpill, the ultimate freeing realization that everything is cyclical, everything under Nature's dominion--even the god(s) we worship: the pagan Gods of Greco-Roman religious cultures were always nature-personified, byproducts of nature, or somehow subjected to nature. Nature always has the final say. Contrasted to Christianity which posits a God outside of time and nature, not only above it but absolutely above it, Nature is viewed as something created by an all-powerful aseitic God, not the final power we answer to. This is the opposite of the blackpill. This puts the emphasis on humanity instead of Nature. Nature either endows you with the ability to procreate, to continue a species lineage millions of years old, or it doesn't. (And in our case, we fall in the latter camp.) This is the terrifying reality of the blackpill, that you aren't in control, that time is cyclical, that humanity is stuck in a time-loop of destruction and life. The history of humanity is a blip in a larger cosmic drama of rebirth and dissolution. "Surfing the Kali Yuga" is being able to manipulate this fact to your advantage. To those who are able to do so, I say: Godspeed, soldier. You have nothing to lose but your chains. To the rest of us who can't, for whatever psychological or biological reason, know this: you were never in control to begin with. It's always been Nature.

Let those who have ears, hear.


Footnotes

[1] In the common sense normie narrative of Elliot Rodger's life, he is depicted as a virulent misogynist who only hates women; this, however, is not true. He equally ascribes the same blame, if not more, against men in his life who bullied him. Proof of this point: He opens his manifesto calling out humanity as the chief cause of his suffering, not just women. Many men are described negatively and with abject hatred; so the thesis he "just" hated women and was a MGTOW pro-man misogynist is a false one.
tldr
sounds like something an incel would say - :soy::foidSoy::chad:
 
Bound by nature... The terrifying reality of the blackpill... You aren't in control...

I hear ya bro; hopefully I can one day learn to properly surf the Kali Yuga.
 
There is no contradiction in
Casual sex and love is what we all desire.
and
teaches the only acceptable expression of sexuality is in marriage
So, this thread is incorrect.
 
Religious people :feelshaha:
 
Shit thread ngl.

Incel means you can’t get laid, end of story.
 
>No argument
"Christianity consistently tells us to "keep it in your pants" and orient your eyes towards the things of heaven. Compare this to blackpilled inceldom, where reciprocal love and sex with a female is the highest goal in life..."

You gotta read the full poast my nigga. It wasn't even about that. it's about much more than that....
 
Compare this to blackpilled inceldom, where reciprocal love and sex with a female is the highest goal in life...
You made this up. That's not what blackpill means.
This is literally foid worship btw, which is even banned here, retard.
 
Still not true. Blackpill means looks are the most important things in dating.
read my post nigga. blackpill is about biology overdetermining everything you do, including social standing.
 
You made this up. That's not what blackpill means.
Nigga: Incels.is is a community for men that struggle with or are unable to get into romantic relationships with women despite trying.
U have got to read my post before commenting. READ THE WHOLE THING NIGGA.
 
Incels.is is a community for men that struggle with or are unable to get into romantic relationships with women despite trying.
Yes, I have read the description of this website. Your point is?
 
Yes, I have read the description of this website. Your point is?
YOU HAVE TO READ THE ENTIRE POST. PLEASE READ MY ENTIRE POST I DEVELOP SEVERAL PERTINENT THEMES THAT ANSWER UR PEDANTIC OBJECTIONS.
 
YOU HAVE TO READ THE ENTIRE POST. PLEASE READ MY ENTIRE POST I DEVELOP SEVERAL PERTINENT THEMES THAT ANSWER UR PEDANTIC OBJECTIONS.
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU HAVE TO READ ALL OF MY BABBLE EVEN THOUGH THE FIRST FUCKING PARAGRAPH IS WRONG AND THE WHOLE THING BREAKS BECAUSE OF IT.
RetardCHAD, I have explained this already. You first paragraph is:
Casual sex and love is what we all desire.
Christianity teaches the only acceptable expression of sexuality is in marriage
And you imply that these statements contradict each other, that's the whole point of your shitty thread, and I'm telling you that these two statements DO NOT contradict each other, so your whole thread is pointless.
 
I mean, I agree somewhat, but I feel like this isn't all that relevant? There's one thing for certain at the end of the day: You're an ugly, kissless virgin. That's all that matters in terms of your (love) life. It really doesn't matter if you're who you are because of your biology or nature or god or anything else. Although maybe this thread might awaken a christcuck to leave the cult though, so I support this post. Religion must go ASAP.
 
And you imply that these statements contradict each other, that's the whole point of your shitty thread, and I'm telling you that these two statements DO NOT contradict each other, so your whole thread is pointless.
Ok since you will not read the post I will help u out. Of course, in theory, they are not contradictory. But I develop a theme of attitude towards fleshly desires--the blackpill positing we are biological creatures programmed to FUCK constantly while Christianity preaches abstinence for long periods of time until marriage--between two antitheses: loving the flesh (blackpiled inceldom) vs hating it (christianity).... READ THE POST
 
Hard projection by the way. I wanna fall asleep in my loving wife's arms.
It was a blanket generalization that of course has exceptions. I can tell u didn't read the full post because i said later in the beginning paragraph that "The majority of people on this forum do not care if love & sex is expressed within the confines of marriage; however, even if you desire and only will have sex within the societal institution of marriage, my point still stands. Let me explain..." and proceeded to Xplain....
 
isn't all that relevant?
it's relevant because i trace a radical (at the root of) attitude towards the body between the blackpill and christianity and show how they contradict one another.
 
It was a blanket generalization that of course has exceptions. I can tell u didn't read the full post because i said later in the beginning paragraph that "The majority of people on this forum do not care if love & sex is expressed within the confines of marriage; however, even if you desire and only will have sex within the societal institution of marriage, my point still stands. Let me explain..." and proceeded to Xplain....
No, I did read the whole post, including that part. I'm just saying that..
Casual sex and love is what we all desire.
..is a wrong sentence.
 
it's relevant because i trace a radical (at the root of) attitude towards the body between the blackpill and christianity and show how they contradict one another.
I mean, you don't really need the blackpill to pull you out of the Christian cult. An above-room temperature IQ will suffice.
 
I mean, you don't really need the blackpill to pull you out of the Christian cult. An above-room temperature IQ will suffice.
There are smart Christians. There are smart people across large swaths of ideologies/religions. imo
 
(casual sex) and (love)

not casual (sex and love)

if u know what i mean
That's still not correct, but I won't argue about it any further. We shouldn't sweat the semantics.
 
There are smart Christians.
They are using religion to cope with the brutality of life, or are willfully avoiding asking serious questions to themselves about it. I doubt most of those smart Christians would still be Christians after doing some serious research.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top