Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

You can either love or understand women

Homegrownman326

Homegrownman326

Veteran
★★
Joined
May 24, 2025
Posts
1,175
Online time
5h 3m
You can either love or understand women. In this space, we're exposed to the raw realities of female nature. Most of us grew up wanting love at some point in our lives, but now it has become a mere illusion, a falsehood. There's no safety, no love, and no security to be found in relationships with women. Even Chad suffers from this. Tom Brady got cheated on, women grow accustomed to their partners over time, no matter who you are, they get bored, subsequently nuking the relationship to monkey branch. Monkey branching doesn't even mean going to a guy who's objectively better in every conceivable way; one guy might express the dark triad despite being marginally uglier, she'll leave her HTN golden retriever for him. That's just the tip of the iceberg; the point is that women are chaotic, irrational, immoral, lacking in honor, incapable of love, and opportunistic at their core. They will never love you the way you love them, and Chad isn't even safe from their bullshit, when Chad dies maybe they shed a few tears but they go onto the next one within days. (This isn't to say Chad isn't treated a million times better, just to say that they aren't immune to the entirety of female bullshit).
 
I think I could love an 1800s trad woman like a pet.
 
I think I could love an 1800s trad woman like a pet.
There's no such thing as a "trad woman". All women are the same across all times and places; they all operate on the same biological imperatives, mating strategies, attraction dynamics, etc. Women in Thailand, Nigeria, and New York are all fundamentally the same. Women 100,000 years ago, 250 years ago, and today are all the same. They're attracted to the same traits in men that they've always been. The only difference is that we kept them in line, we limited their freedom and education, and we slapped them when they were out of line, like the livestock they are.
 
There's no such thing as a "trad woman". All women are the same across all times and places; they all operate on the same biological imperatives, mating strategies, attraction dynamics, etc. Women in Thailand, Nigeria, and New York are all fundamentally the same. Women 100,000 years ago, 250 years ago, and today are all the same. They're attracted to the same traits in men that they've always been. The only difference is that we kept them in line, we limited their freedom and education, and we slapped them when they were out of line, like the livestock they are.
im referring to the ones kept in line.
 
im referring to the ones kept in line.
I was just making a point that there's no such thing as a "1800s woman" as it isn't the time that made them act that way, but the societal structures and the beatings. If we all started beating women and taking their rights away tomorrow, we'd all have submissive trad wives the next day. And for the record women want to be talked down to and treated like shit, feminism is just one big societal shit test and we failed.
 
Last edited:
I was just making a point that there's no such thing as a "1800s woman" as it isn't the time that made them act that way, but the societal structures and the beatings. If we all started beating women and taking their rights away tomorrow, we'd all have submissive trad wives the next day. And for the record women want to be talked down to and treated like shit, feminism is just one big societal shit test and we lost.
glows me
 
They will never love you the way you love them, and Chad isn't even safe from their bullshit, when Chad dies maybe they shed a few tears but they go onto the next one within days.
I've seen it before. A guy in my high school died and his girlfriend was fucking another guy within a week.
 
Tom Brady got cheated on
Monkey branching doesn't even mean going to a guy who's objectively better in every conceivable way; one guy might express the dark triad despite being marginally uglier
Exactly what happened to Tom Brady, his animal wife saw him get chokeholded by the other chad and her brain immediately ran the monkey-male dominance calculation and decided to cheat
 
All womens actions are based off this monkey-male dominance calculation, the reason it doesn't work for an incel chokeholding chad is because a foids brain calculates that this is probably an exception to the usual occurence due to chad's genes.
 
im referring to the ones kept in line.
@Homegrownman326 is right even the ones 'kept in line' are still the same animals thinking the same shit, but what @Fantasea is saying I think is as long as the foid is kept in line he could love it like a pet as in how people have snakes or pet spiders who are cool but don't really love. I agree because if you can be guaranteed the foid isn't going to cheat or divorce rape you could love it in a more trivial kind of way that this thing seems cute even though it isn't capable of the emotions you are. However cats and dogs are capable of love far more than foids.
 
I've seen it before. A guy in my high school died and his girlfriend was fucking another guy within a week.
People tell us to go outside and 'women aren't really like this' but then I go the fuck outside and see stuff like this + in my experience a teenage foid fucking a dog in front of a group of people and another foid who had two boyfriends, a chad one she was fucking and an emotional tampon who hadn't even seen her hole.
 
Exactly what happened to Tom Brady, his animal wife saw him get chokeholded by the other chad and her brain immediately ran the monkey-male dominance calculation and decided to cheat
I love how people attempt to challenge that narrative when it's so blatantly true. Never show weakness, women don't care about objective weakness the way we do, they care about subjective weakness, and if you could avoid showing that, then do so. On the topic of fights, there's an element of luck to it; the guy who is supposed to win doesn't all the time, and I'm talking street fights specifically. That's a rare occurrence, but not unheard of, as inexperienced people don't have a predictable rhythm. There's no such thing as a mythical man who will beat every single person on the planet in a fight time and time again. There's always a level of luck.
 
I love how people attempt to challenge that narrative when it's so blatantly true. Never show weakness, women don't care about objective weakness the way we do, they care about subjective weakness, and if you could avoid showing that, then do so. On the topic of fights, there's an element of luck to it; the guy who is supposed to win doesn't all the time, and I'm talking street fights specifically. That's a rare occurrence, but not unheard of, as inexperienced people don't have a predictable rhythm. There's no such thing as a mythical man who will beat every single person on the planet in a fight time and time again. There's always a level of luck.
That's something good you touched upon, "subjective weakness." I think it is related to perceived status in society.
We see foids justifying their hypergamy by aggressively selecting against 80% of the male population and stating that " :foidSoy: we choose the tallest and strongest men so they can protect us." Not realizing if they aggressively excluded 80% of the men, those same men would cave in to violence, jump her and her tall and strong partner, and beat the shit out of him collectively before graping her. That's really why the alpha and beta male thing never really took off in human societies. "Betas" would always reunite against the "alpha".
 
toilets don't have hearts, so I can't understand them
 
That's something good you touched upon, "subjective weakness." I think it is related to perceived status in society.
We see foids justifying their hypergamy by aggressively selecting against 80% of the male population and stating that " :foidSoy: we choose the tallest and strongest men so they can protect us." Not realizing if they aggressively excluded 80% of the men, those same men would cave in to violence, jump her and her tall and strong partner, and beat the shit out of him collectively before graping her. That's really why the alpha and beta male thing never really took off in human societies. "Betas" would always reunite against the "alpha".
Great point, all throughout history this level of hypergamous bullshit wouldn't be tolerated, that 80 percent of men would slaughter women and chads to punish them and force them to concede to their demands. On the topic of fighting, the guy who beat Tom Brady has most certainly lost fights himself; martial arts aren't a real representation of real stakes and real fights, there's a whole other level to violence beyond them. Women are incapable of thinking in abstracts, like, despite this guy winning in this particular fight, he has most likely lost plenty of fights to get where he is, and he will probably continue to lose fights against more skilled or larger opponents. Instead of understanding the nuances, women just focus on the here and now.
 
I think I could love an 1800s trad woman like a pet.
Wym like a pet? All I do is dream about going to the 1850s and having a 1850s wife
 
Wym like a pet? All I do is dream about going to the 1850s and having a 1850s wife
Women have been the same throughout history, the only difference is that society made sure they didn't have the autonomy needed to act like the pieces of shit they are now.
 
Women have been the same throughout history, the only difference is that society made sure they didn't have the autonomy needed to act like the pieces of shit they are now.
partly true I suppose. I still stand by my statement
 

Similar threads

FoidsEnshittifyAll
Replies
1
Views
685
FoidsEnshittifyAll
FoidsEnshittifyAll
She Does Not Exist
Replies
9
Views
963
FiendNeet
FiendNeet
newcc
Replies
4
Views
426
SociallyStunted
SociallyStunted
RobertGarnicasAPedo
Replies
29
Views
3K
Hoodpreet
Hoodpreet

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top