currycell900
If sex is not a human right, neither is abortion
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2025
- Posts
- 6,419
- Online time
- 2d 3h
Yigal Amir’s assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin on 4 November 1995 is often seen as a turning point that derailed the best chance for a lasting two-state solution between Israelis and Palestinians. Here’s how his act impacted the peace process:
In summary:
Yigal Amir didn’t just kill Rabin — he effectively killed the political climate in Israel that made a two-state solution possible. By removing Rabin, empowering hardliners, and fueling mistrust, Amir ensured that peace became more distant, and that the two-state solution shifted from a real possibility into a fading ideal.
1. Killing the Architect of Oslo
- Rabin was not only Israel’s prime minister but also the driving political force behind the Oslo Accords (1993, 1995).
- Oslo established mutual recognition between Israel and the PLO, and it set the framework for gradual Palestinian self-rule leading to a potential Palestinian state.
- His assassination removed the leader most committed — and powerful enough militarily and politically — to deliver on those promises.
2. Shift in Israeli Politics
- After Rabin, Shimon Peres briefly took over, but he lacked Rabin’s authority and military credibility.
- In 1996, Benjamin Netanyahu (then a critic of Oslo) won the elections by mobilizing right-wing fears about terrorism and territorial concessions.
- Netanyahu’s rise marked the beginning of Israel’s increasing skepticism and resistance toward Oslo’s goals.
3. Collapse of Trust
- Palestinians saw Rabin as a partner who was willing to take risks for peace, even though he was a former general.
- After his death, mutual distrust deepened:
- Terrorist attacks by Hamas and Islamic Jihad escalated.
- Israel’s crackdown and settlement expansion increased.
- The fragile balance Oslo depended on broke apart.
4. Message of Extremism
- Amir, a religious nationalist, murdered Rabin to stop land-for-peace. His success sent a message: extremist violence can derail compromise.
- Palestinian extremists also took note — believing that violence could block negotiations and weaken moderates on both sides.
5. From Oslo to Intifada
- The peace process limped on in the late 1990s (Wye River, Camp David 2000), but Rabin’s assassination had already sapped momentum.
- By 2000, the Second Intifada erupted, burying hopes of Oslo permanently.
Yigal Amir didn’t just kill Rabin — he effectively killed the political climate in Israel that made a two-state solution possible. By removing Rabin, empowering hardliners, and fueling mistrust, Amir ensured that peace became more distant, and that the two-state solution shifted from a real possibility into a fading ideal.





