Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Soy "yet their findings need to be interpreted with caution"

  • Thread starter WorthlessSlavicShit
  • Start date
WorthlessSlavicShit

WorthlessSlavicShit

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 30, 2022
Posts
9,823

Studies on bidirectional IPV mostly reported women's perpetration to be almost as high as that of their partner or even higher, yet their findings need to be interpreted with caution.
Fucking every time:lasereyes::lasereyes::feelsree::feelsree:. Every single time a study shows gender symmetry in IPV or other types of violence, the "neutral" and "non-political" researchers include the mandatory clarifier that, akshually, men are still the worse ones and whatever women do is not as bad as what men do, trust me bro, it's soyence, we just made it so:soy::soy::foidSoy::foidSoy:.

Of the 766 studies assessing prevalence estimates identified, 86 were included, where 80 studies focused on unidirectional IPV (i.e., perpetrated by men against women) and six studies investigated bidirectional IPV (i.e., IPV perpetrated by both partners).
Eighty studies supporting the sociopolitical narrative we want to push? Obviously, all of them are flawless:soy:. Six studies kinda blunting that by not even really contradicting them, just expanding on them in a direction we don't want? Yikes, sweaty, remember to be critical and not to believe anything you read:foidSoy:.

The very fact of how the thought of unidirectional female-perpetrated abuse seems completely nonexistent in the worldviews of the researchers really says it all. Meanwhile, as a lot of MRAs and other manospherians have already posted a lot of times, for years we've had a pretty decently sized study showing that 70% of all unidirectional partner abuse is perpetrated by women and directed at men:feelsUgh:.

 
Below the age of 14 children are categorically more likely to be injured, or killed, by their mother than by any other person.
 
Below the age of 14 children are categorically more likely to be injured, or killed, by their mother than by any other person.
:yes:
 
akshually, men are still the worse ones and whatever women do is not as bad as what men do, trust me bro, it's soyence, we just made it so:soy::soy::foidSoy::foidSoy:.
Yeah its a study, we don't need their fucking jewpinion kek yet they still find a way to sneak it in there
 


Fucking every time:lasereyes::lasereyes::feelsree::feelsree:. Every single time a study shows gender symmetry in IPV or other types of violence, the "neutral" and "non-political" researchers include the mandatory clarifier that, akshually, men are still the worse ones and whatever women do is not as bad as what men do, trust me bro, it's soyence, we just made it so:soy::soy::foidSoy::foidSoy:.


Eighty studies supporting the sociopolitical narrative we want to push? Obviously, all of them are flawless:soy:. Six studies kinda blunting that by not even really contradicting them, just expanding on them in a direction we don't want? Yikes, sweaty, remember to be critical and not to believe anything you read:foidSoy:.

The very fact of how the thought of unidirectional female-perpetrated abuse seems completely nonexistent in the worldviews of the researchers really says it all. Meanwhile, as a lot of MRAs and other manospherians have already posted a lot of times, for years we've had a pretty decently sized study showing that 70% of all unidirectional partner abuse is perpetrated by women and directed at men:feelsUgh:.

90% of violence in society is perpetrated by foids against men.
90% of the remainder is perpetrated by men against other men in order to impress foids.
90% of the remainder is perpetrated by foids against other foids.

So,

99,9% of violence starts with foids.

a scientific prediction is that a Marxist-Rodgerist foidless society would experience 0,1% of the violence we see in foidish society.
 
There is no such thing as unbiased researcher, and any good research would admit that but obviously there work threatens the very nature of the gender dynamics of the post modern world so it has to be covered up
 
There is no such thing as unbiased researcher, and any good research would admit that but obviously there work threatens the very nature of the gender dynamics of the post modern world so it has to be covered up
 
There's always an excuse for these whores
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top