PPEcel
cope and seethe
-
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2018
- Posts
- 29,089
In an 8-0 opinion authored by Alito in United States v. Briggs, SCOTUS overturned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and ruled that the five-year statute of limitations in the UCMJ (U.S. military law) did not apply to rape.
See, the UCMJ's provisions allow for the death penalty to be applied in a wide range of offenses; it also holds that offenses "punishable by death, may be tried and punished at any time without limitation". Rape is one of those offenses.
However, in Coker v. Georgia (1977), SCOTUS ruled that it was unconstitutional (under the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment) to apply the death penalty in cases involving the rape of an adult where the victim did not die. (This ruling would later be extended to cases involving the rape of a child in Kennedy v. Louisiana (2008)). Consequently, in U.S. law today, the death penalty is only ever applied in cases of premeditated murder.
So Lt. Col. Briggs' legal team argued that the phrase "punishable by death" means "punishable by death when all laws are taken into account".
However, the Trump administration, represented by Solicitor General Jeffrey B. Wall, argued the phrase meant "punishable by death within the provisions of the UCMJ".
The Supreme Court sided with the government and against the AirForcecel.
I look forward to reading your commentary.
See, the UCMJ's provisions allow for the death penalty to be applied in a wide range of offenses; it also holds that offenses "punishable by death, may be tried and punished at any time without limitation". Rape is one of those offenses.
However, in Coker v. Georgia (1977), SCOTUS ruled that it was unconstitutional (under the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment) to apply the death penalty in cases involving the rape of an adult where the victim did not die. (This ruling would later be extended to cases involving the rape of a child in Kennedy v. Louisiana (2008)). Consequently, in U.S. law today, the death penalty is only ever applied in cases of premeditated murder.
So Lt. Col. Briggs' legal team argued that the phrase "punishable by death" means "punishable by death when all laws are taken into account".
However, the Trump administration, represented by Solicitor General Jeffrey B. Wall, argued the phrase meant "punishable by death within the provisions of the UCMJ".
The Supreme Court sided with the government and against the AirForcecel.
I look forward to reading your commentary.