
Coldone666
Major
★★
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2023
- Posts
- 2,122
This, you can just marry a fat rich chick and have a GF on the side anyway.poor chad for sure. would do anything do give up this miserable lonely virgin life
This, you can just marry a fat rich chick and have a GF on the side anyway.poor chad for sure. would do anything do give up this miserable lonely virgin life
Fag detected . . .See that's the thing, I've experienced "real love"... Not romantic love, love with male friends... Most notably, my best friend of 20 years who recently passed from COVID at 33... But that wasnt initiated by a physical attraction . My question is, Is "real love" with a foid possible? Is real love just lucky cheek/nose structure combined with light skin/ good height? Can't be more real than love from bros... I don't think.
didnt read anything but the titleRich Incel:
Arguments in Favor:
1. Financial Freedom: Wealth provides the means to enjoy a higher quality of life, with access to education, no wage-slaving, better healthcare, and various experiences such as: access to high-quality escorts, latest VR technology, etc.
2. Opportunities for Change: Financial resources enable hard-looksmaxxing, and other interventions that may help address foid/toilet challenges.
3. Autonomy: Financial independence allows for personal pursuits and the freedom to make choices without being constrained by economic limitations.
Arguments Against:
1. Emotional Isolation: Despite financial success, social isolation will still persist and will lead to loneliness and emotional struggles, lacking the importance of meaningful connections.
2. Shallow Relationships: Wealth can attract individuals who are interested more in material benefits than genuine emotional connections, hindering authentic relationships and rendering you into a betabuxxdeluxe.
3. Existential Discontent: The pursuit of material success alone will not fulfil deeper emotional and existential needs, leading to a sense of dissatisfaction. Self-improvement can also be a form of self-hate, i.e., having to go under surgery just to attract a toilet.
———————————
Poor Chad:
Arguments in Favor:
1. Authentic Relationships: Lookism will allow a toilet relationship to be built on genuine desire, fostering authenticity.
2. Personal Growth: Overcoming economic challenges can lead to resilience, self-discovery, and a focus on personal development. But this is probably copium.
3. Halo-Effect: The halo-effect of your looks will create belonging to a social community and can provide emotional support and a sense of solidarity.
Arguments Against:
1. Financial Struggles: Economic challenges and wage-cucking will limit opportunities for personal growth, education, and accessing essential services, impacting overall well-being.
2. Societal Pressure: The societal emphasis on financial success may create additional stress and feelings of inadequacy, forcing you to compete with other chads who are rich, affecting mental health.
Obviously you never had friends.Fag detected . . .
![]()
I’ve had valuable male friends but I never desired them any where near the level I did towards foids.Obviously you never had friends.
I didn't desire him, it's called love... This is why I said "not romantic"... Tf is wrong with u lolI’ve had valuable male friends but I never desired them any where near the level I did towards foids.![]()
I get that, but you compared and contrasted the love you feel towards a man against a woman and you're questioning if the former supercedes the latter. A straight man wouldn't think along those lines.I didn't desire him, it's called love... This is why I said "not romantic"... Tf is wrong with u lol
This is the whole point of my question... I know I'm straight .. I crave women's bodies... But I question if I could actually love one.. ya know, actually stand to listen to one talk EVERYDAY.. I could talk with my boy Henry about bullshit topics everyday .. Do you actually think that's possible with a freaking FOID!? THIS IS MY QUESTIONI get that, but you compared and contrasted the love you feel towards a man against a woman and you're questioning if the former supercedes the latter. A straight man wouldn't think along those lines.
![]()