Serious Would it be theoretically possible to make an equation for SMV?

[ThePlagueDoctor]

You’d need a equation that relates EVERYTHING, measurements of the bones of your face, height, some kind of constant for different races, amount of hair, constants for eye shapes, etc.

Not only that, but you’d need a function that caps out at a certain point for specific features and the equation needs to recognize things like your cheekbone height can’t be too high or a 3ft dude with a god tier face is still gonna have lower smv than a Chad.

It seems hard as fuck, but has anyone done it or tried to do it?

 

[metabuxx]

You would need a body scanner, then something to figure out your genetic code and then a powerful computer to put that all together and formulate your SMV. Its a hard thing to accomplish.

 

[Deleted member 20811]

I propose an equation that includes:

Face + Race + Height + Frame + Dick + Physique + Voice + head Hair. You add your stats for each of these and then put them in a calculator.

Only problem is to figure out the exact science for each one.

 

[TINMAN]

Not really, there's no limit to how chadly you can be. Imagine someone 9' tall with a 10/10 face, frame of a thundergod, and a 16" penis. Women are like female peacocks, there's no limit to how far you can go, they will always go for the biggest mogger. Even if they were so large that they had to use her like a fleshlight they wouldn't care.

 

[ThePlagueDoctor]

I need high IQ cels for this, @PPEcel @Anonymous MG

I propose an equation that includes:

Face + Race + Height + Frame + Dick + Physique + Voice + head Hair. You add your stats for each of these and then put them in a calculator.

Only problem is to figure out the exact science for each one.

I already know race, voice, and head hair will be constants, physique and face will be dependent on numerous smaller measurements. Height and dick can be simple measurements. Are we missing anything else?

Not really, there's no limit to how chadly you can be. Imagine someone 9' tall with a 10/10 face, frame of a thundergod, and a 16" penis. Women are like female peacocks, there's no limit to how far you can go, they will always go for the biggest mogger. Even if they were so large that they had to use her like a fleshlight they wouldn't care.

Equations don’t have a limit. They can go to infinity. It’s just that certain values can’t be absurd and still work, if that makes sense

 

[TINMAN]

I need high IQ cels for this, @PPEcel @Anonymous MG

I already know race, voice, and head hair will be constants, physique and face will be dependent on numerous smaller measurements. Height and dick can be simple measurements. Are we missing anything else?

Equations don’t have a limit. They can go to infinity

Right, but ratings are done on a 1-10 scale. Hence the equation you would right for it would have to have either a limit or diminishing returns, which isn't accurate.

 

[ThePlagueDoctor]

Right, but ratings are done on a 1-10 scale.

I think a 1-10 scale will have to be proportional to the value of the result of the equation. Or just throw a constant in there to make the answer fit into a 1-10 scale

 

[TINMAN]

I think a 1-10 scale will have to be proportional to the value of the result of the equation. Or just throw a constant in there to make the answer fit into a 1-10 scale

I suppose we could set up a new rating system based on a score value (say for example a normie would get 300, while a chad gets 1000, gigachad gets 1300, and the mogger I just described gets 2000) rather than a finite scale. That way if a chadder chad is found then it is reflected in their score getting higher, instead of them being the same 10/10 rating that a lesser chad would get.

But then the issue of adoption comes in to play, if no one uses the score system then designing it would be pointless.

 

[ThePlagueDoctor]

You would need a body scanner, then something to figure out your genetic code and then a powerful computer to put that all together and formulate your SMV. Its a hard thing to accomplish.

No, those aren’t things you can easily physically measure. I’m talking about taking things you can easily measure like height, jaw width, etc

the issue of adoption comes in to play, if no one uses the score system then designing it would be pointless.

I feel like people are insecure enough to want a way to accurately measure their SMV

the changed scale is a good idea btw

 

[AlexanderTheGreat11]

Probably

 

[MountainGorilla]

The Anti-Looks Equation

 

[Deleted member 12355]

the equation would have to take into account every possible sequence of traits in conjunction with one another in such a way that it'd theoretically encompass any possible future human's exact looks and height, down to every precise millimeter of bone. The issue with this is that we do not have the required data nor the computing capacity to undertake such an immense task

 

[PPEcel]

I propose an equation that includes:

Face + Race + Height + Frame + Dick + Physique + Voice + head Hair. You add your stats for each of these and then put them in a calculator.

Only problem is to figure out the exact science for each one.

When I was at boarding school, as a junior, I had a spreadsheet. My friends and I would rate each foid and for each characteristic; we would do so for all foids in our year group.

I would take the 0-10 rating and compute the z-score of each foid's characteristic relative to all other foids. Then I would compile a weighted mean of all z-scores for each foid because on the importance of each characteristic.

The scores ranged approximately from -2.5 to +2.5.

It wasn't very scientific but I had a very limited understanding of statistics when I was 16.

I need high IQ cels for this, @PPEcel @Anonymous MG

Equations don’t have a limit. They can go to infinity. It’s just that certain values can’t be absurd and still work, if that makes sense

 

[chadalwayswins]

When I was at boarding school, as a junior, I had a spreadsheet. My friends and I would rate each foid and for each characteristic; we would do so for all foids in our year group.

interesting - what was the factor that had the biggest impact on overall foid rating?

also, are there many sub-humans at boarding schools? always wondered too, how 15 year old trust fund chads fuck, given the lack of privacy for boarders

 

[PPEcel]

Not really, there's no limit to how chadly you can be. Imagine someone 9' tall with a 10/10 face, frame of a thundergod, and a 16" penis. Women are like female peacocks, there's no limit to how far you can go, they will always go for the biggest mogger. Even if they were so large that they had to use her like a fleshlight they wouldn't care.

I've got an idea. This is a qualitative way to "rate" SMV. I got the inspiration for this from the Elo chess rating system.

Let's say there is a pool of several thousand males, a computer, and hundreds of femoid "judges" of attractiveness.

Each male starts off with 1,000 "points".

When the system starts running, the computer will create a "match"; the algorithm will send pictures and the stats of two random males out of that pool to a random femoid "judge". The femoid will have to decide within a half a minute which male is more attractive. The losing male will then transfer "points" to the winning male.

In each "match", between two males that have a similar amount of points, a larger amount of points will be transferred. But between two males with a sizeable point difference, only a small amount of points will be transferred. The algorithm will determine the exact number of points transferred in every "match".

After hundreds of thousands of matches, each male's rating will eventually approach equilibrium. The more matches, the more accurate the system is.

The points that each male has after all the matches are completed will provide a measure of a male's SMV relative to the other males in that pool. Chads who often prevail in these matches will accumulate a large number of points from subhuman males.

 

[Personalityinkwell]

The problem is you'd have to factor in things such as location. A 5.5 in LA is truecel but if that 5.5 goes to the midwest he could be Chadlite tier

 

[ThePlagueDoctor]

The problem is you'd have to factor in things such as location. A 5.5 in LA is truecel but if that 5.5 goes to the midwest he could be Chadlite tier

Easy fix, multipliers.

Values of less than 1 for regions that are very hypergamous, values of higher than 1 for ones where it’s easier to slay

 

[based_meme]

You’d need a equation that relates EVERYTHING, measurements of the bones of your face, height, some kind of constant for different races, amount of hair, constants for eye shapes, etc.

Not only that, but you’d need a function that caps out at a certain point for specific features and the equation needs to recognize things like your cheekbone height can’t be too high or a 3ft dude with a god tier face is still gonna have lower smv than a Chad.

It seems hard as fuck, but has anyone done it or tried to do it?

The golden ratio has been applied to facial proportions to determine the perfectly attractive facial structure.

That's the closest thing anybody has done with regards to work on the mathematics of attractiveness.

If you ask the face>everything crowd, that's all you need to determine accurate measurements of SMV.

 

[Deleted member 2047]

its the minimum of all your traits

 

[ThePlagueDoctor]

If you ask the face>everything crowd, that's all you need to determine accurate measurements of SMV.

But lets be honest, a 4 foot guy with a slayer face won’t be a slayer

I've got an idea. This is a qualitative way to "rate" SMV. I got the inspiration for this from the Elo chess rating system.

Let's say there is a pool of several thousand males, a computer, and hundreds of femoid "judges" of attractiveness.

Each male starts off with 1,000 "points".

When the system starts running, the computer will create a "match"; the algorithm will send pictures and the stats of two random males out of that pool to a random femoid "judge". The femoid will have to decide within a half a minute which male is more attractive. The losing male will then transfer "points" to the winning male.

In each "match", between two males that have a similar amount of points, a larger amount of points will be transferred. But between two males with a sizeable point difference, only a small amount of points will be transferred. The algorithm will determine the exact number of points transferred in every "match".

After hundreds of thousands of matches, each male's rating will eventually approach equilibrium. The more matches, the more accurate the system is.

The points that each male has after all the matches are completed will provide a measure of a male's SMV relative to the other males in that pool. Chads who often prevail in these matches will accumulate a large number of points from subhuman males.

Good idea, but I think there could be a few changes

1) instead of having the women say who they find more attractive, we use brain imaging scans to see which image invokes a higher release of dopamine

2) instead of exposure of each image for half a minute, make it 3-5 seconds, because that dopamine release is practically instant