Discussion Would it be ethical to kill a baby if you knew they'd grow to be an incel?

[MuddyBuddy]

Let's say that hypothetically we're living in an alternate future where Hitler wins and the third Reich expanded throughout the world . Their eugenics program is perfected to the point where they can determine with 100% certainty if a child will become incel. Is it ethical to kill this child to save them from future pain and not have them as a blight on the Aryan race.

​

 

[Truckzo]

i like seeing humans suffer with me so no

 

[Theinvoluntarycelib]

Yes, but remember that the definition of incels is simply the males who are lowest in the pecking order. If we eradicate the bad looking males now, later on chads will get mogged by giga-chads and they will become the new incels.

There's no way to win

 

[Zogpilled]

It’s humane

 

[nystagmuscel]

Yes, it would prevent a lot of suffering

 

[Zhou Chang-Xing]

Post-Natal abortions should be legal, you can't pick up all deformities during pregnancy.

Also, if a mother sees an ugly son after birth she'll strangle him with the umbilical cord if she was alone, which is why toilets are forced to give birth surrounded by others and why mothers are rarely trusted alone with their sons. Because they would kill their Incel sons, friendzone their Normie sons and won't let them such their breasts, and rape their Chad sons causing life-long trauma.

 

[subhuman]

No because killing is wrong

 

[HateCurry]

yes equals fakecel.

We're talking full on chopping them up, not abortions or any unborn fetus shit we talking gangsta shit and that's we gon do it.

I say no.

 

[Shrek]

No because killing is wrong

 

[ugly_genius]

its kind of ironic. By this very same thinking should we even be allowed to reproduce at all then ?? Seeing as all we would end up bringing into the world would most likely be more genes doomed to a life of inceldom (probably even worse than ours as chads genes improve more)

Following this premise through to its conclusion… All these stacys/gigastacys are actually doing us an inverted FAVOUR by denying us the means to perpetuate our suffering and inferiority into a subsequent generation to endure it all over again.

 

[ugly_genius]

So im gona vote no to kill.

But if the question were not to have at all in first place. I would probably say yes to that.

I dont think it is right to kill other sentient life once it exists. But bringing it into existence in the first place knowing it will suffer this plight… that's the real error

 

[Deleted member 42964]

If a child is an incel it's because of women's perverted sexuality, so no. On the other hand I don't care too much for human life either way so... I guess killing a baby is fine.

 

[ogleman]

MY BODY MY RIGHT

 

[ugly_genius]

If a child is an incel it's because of women's perverted sexuality,

c0pe

Sorry to break it to ya bud, but what we all console ourselves trying to classify as women's "perverted sexual nature" is nothing but their truest base biological animal genetic drives - just having the doors opened to be expressed without restraint.

Just nature doing its thing and we are not on the timetable for this last leg of the journey.

Denial wont change the facts.

 

[Deleted member 42964]

Sorry to break it to ya bud, but what we all console ourselves trying to classify as women's "perverted sexual nature" is nothing but their truest base biological animal genetic drives - just having the doors opened to be expressed without restraint.

Just nature doing its thing and we are not on the timetable for this last leg of the journey.

Well, just because it's their biological drive, doesn't mean it's not perverted. Homosexuals also have a perverted sexual drive. The thing is, if women's natural instinct is to be attracted to the chads, that was not the case under a patriarchal society, so a lot of that is because of the influence of Jewish-feminism. Before the so-called "women's liberation", you could see a lot of 2/10 guys get plenty of women. You could see guys who would be incels nowadays becoming a family patriarch.

I do believe the problem is largely due to the influence of the Jews on Western society. Even if it wasn't, that still doesn't change my point about incels existing because of women's sexual attraction. Their sexual attraction is flawed, or perhaps, it's been perverted. I do believe women aren't too good at making decisions; I believe they need a man to choose for them.

 

[ugly_genius]

The only reason it has changed is because of their "liberation". It has allowed what they really are under the bonnet to be revealed and played out to its conclusion. I.e. basically dumpster receptacles for chads. Basic biology.

And the homosexual comparison doesn't work, because that really IS a "perversion". In the sense that it literally does 'pervert' the natural purpose of reproductive biology. (the net gain in terms of reproduced offspring is nil).

But when stacy hooks up with chad, tyrone, chang etc... instead of me and you... that is a purely reproductive natural instinct at play there. The hard-as-fuck to swallow pill is that it really isn't perverted at all. It's natural.

Irresponsible on a higher level socially?... yes. But nature doesn't play its games with those ideals in mind.

That is where we were supposed to intervene, and that has all collapsed now. Now it's a free for all. With Chad Tyrone and the crew first in line at the party. But It won't last long though.


and as for the whole "Jew" thing. Not buying that either. If you look at what ultra-orthodox jews really teach/preach. they are vehemently against this sort of immorality. As a matter of fact they even insulate and keep in their own communities in a lot of western countries. No my friend this is the work of eugenicists, and master social engineers. Who will do away with Jews as well as with you or with me at the end of their plans.

The only "Jews" involved in it would be crypto's who pose as pseudo zionists etc... but thats a whole other post in itself.. Suffice it to say they are not even considered as jews by their own community. They dnt even believe in a god most of them.

As far as I am aware most of the religions abhor, command, and warn AGAINST such practices as we have adopted as normal in our 'civilised' society.

 

[Balding Subhuman]

No but they should make a law where you can't abort female fetuses. There's too many young men and the demographics need to be evened out

 

[Deleted member 42964]

The only reason it has changed is because of their "liberation". It has allowed what they really are under the bonnet to be revealed and played out to its conclusion. I.e. basically dumpster receptacles for chads. Basic biology.

And the homosexual comparison doesn't work, because that really IS a "perversion". In the sense that it literally does 'pervert' the natural purpose of reproductive biology. (the net gain in terms of offspring is nil).

But when stacy hooks up with chad, tyrone, chang etc... instead of me and you... that is a purely reproductive natural instinct at play there. The hard-as-fuck to swallow pill is that it really isn't perverted at all.

Irresponsible on a higher level socially?... yes. But nature doesn't play it's games with those ideals in mind.

That is where we were supposed to intervene, and that has all collapsed now. Now it's a free for all. With Chad Tyrone and the crew first in line at the party. But It won' last long though.


and as for the whole "Jew" thing. Not buying that either. If you look at what ultra-orthodox jews really teach/preach. they are vehemently against this sort of immorality. As a matter of fact they even insulate and keep in their own communities in a lot of western countries. No my friend this is the work of eugenicists, and master social engineers. Who will do away with Jews as well as with you or with me at the end of their plans.

The only "Jews" involved in it would be crypto's who pose as pseudo zionists etc... but thats a whole other post in itself.. Suffice it to say they are not even considered as jews by their own community. They dnt even believe in a god most of them.

As far as I am aware most of the religions abhor and command AGAINST such practices as we have adopted as normal in our 'civilised' society.

The Jewish religion is not really a religion. It's merely an instrument to unite the Jewish race.

You say that women's natural instinct is to breed with chads, and therefore, that is not a perversion. It of course depends on how we define "perversion". I believe the fact that women are attracted to that kind of men is proof that women are a lower form of human than men. Their natural instinct to breed with chads comes from thousands of years ago, back when that actually made sense. Of course, during the Ice Age, it made sense for women to breed with strong men, as it was a fight for survival. However, physical strength nowadays is meaningless when compared to intellect or physical beauty. If women did not have such a basic mind, they would not have physical strength as their main criteria to choose which men to breed with. I believe it is perverted because, if we are looking for an intellectual progression of society, then women's attraction is clearly an obstacle to that.

I do believe that, even if women's natural instinct was to be attracted to chads, they would've eventually grown out of that in a patriarchal society, if it wasn't for Jewish influence. Natural instincts can be modified by social conventions. Also, you said that Nature doesn't play with the ideal of social responsibility in mind. I disagree. Nature gave us our natural instincts for the survival of our species. If women can't go beyond their instincts from 10,000 years ago and look for a better future for our society, then it's not Mother Nature's fault, it's women's fault. Women are simple minded. Their instincts made sense a hundred centuries ago, but not nowadays.