Discussion If you were born in the 70s do you think you'd still be an incel?

[blackpillforever]

The virginity rate for young men back then was only around 7%, now it's over 20% and going up. Back then you had to actually be a really ugly freak or very autistic in order to be an incel. There were no dating apps and social media around for females to pick between thousands of men, most of them would have to go for their looksmatch. And there was no feminism encouraging females to be hypergamous bitches. Because of the greatly increased standards in looks and money a lot of men that are incel today that wouldn't be back then.

 

[zd60]

i don't think it matters much what time i'm born in i'd always be one

 

[WastedPotential]

yes i would be travis bickle

 

[minimaltz]

I honestly thing I would have a good chance at dating back then, hypergamy and sex freedom has fucked all my potential and doomed me into being an incel

 

[Solid State]

Yes, I would have probably been institutionalized.

 

[Fed_911]

Yes

 

[Caichan]

Idk

 

[Creamcel]

Probably not.

 

[fatass30000]

probably. Everyone who voted no is probably a normie.

 

[Gaelic-Truecel]

Yes because of my social problems. There are bachelors in my area from all age groups.
Btw when you say "born in the 70's".
That could just be a 25yo in 2003, society wasn't all that different in 2003, I do remember it.

 

[VersoffenerAssi]

Then I would only be about 10 years older lmao

 

[blackpillforever]

Yes because of my social problems. There are bachelors in my area from all age groups.
Btw when you say "born in the 70's".
That could just be a 25yo in 2003, society wasn't all that different in 2003, I do remember it.

When it comes to dating it was way different. The percent of male virgins in the population is double now compared to 2003. Dating apps and social media like instagram that promote hypergamy weren't common, only MySpace was around. Females couldn't swipe through thousands of guys on their smart phone instantly in 2003 like today. The dating market has never been more fucked than it is now.

 

[kapri]

There were no dating apps and social media around for females to pick between thousands of men, most of them would have to go for their looksmatch.

Not only that, but the "you don't need no man" propaganda coupled with "if you're gonna find a man he has to be your level in everything or above", is completely rotting both womens and mens minds.

Men have lost their purpose, became paralyzed by the black pill, and are being stomped and spit on, yet are expected to achieve more than ever while getting less than ever. They are without direction and crushed by the added weight.

Women on the other hand, have everything optional, they stole mens purpose, while keeping theirs, meaning they can have but don't need a job, but if they have a job the man has to make more than the foid. They can be a housewife, but don't have to. They can slut out, but being picky and shy is seen also as a virtue. They are being care for, as if they are children and vulnerable, they are still the gentle gender. And not only are these delusions socially propagated, they get reaffirmed by the stuff you've already said.

There is absolutely no incentive for a foid to find a partner today. Absolutely none. They have it all. The doors for them are still being opened by men literally AND figuratively. And why would they "settle" for someone of the same worth? Would you get out of your bed to sleep on a couch? Or even a same bed but 2 meters away? Do you think they will start opening their own door or open doors for you? NO NIGGA.

 

[SubstandardBlackCel]

Women on the other hand, have everything optional, they stole mens purpose, while keeping theirs, meaning they can have but don't need a job, but if they have a job the man has to make more than the foid. They can be a housewife, but don't have to. They can slut out, but being picky and shy is seen also as a virtue. They are being care for, as if they are children and vulnerable, they are still the gentle gender. And not only are these delusions socially propagated, they get reaffirmed by the stuff you've already said.

this is the most blackpilling part of modern society in terms of sexual access & gender dynamics. they can cock carousel from 13-28, then once they get too fat for Chad to waste his weekends railing, they wanna demand this fantasy 'traditional man' who pays the bills, has her not work, allows her to do whatever she wants, and then comes home & is 'emotionally available' to her constant bitching & moaning.
In reality, that era was based because the traditional man actually had power. If your wife was nagging your ear off in the presence of company and you slapped her, the general society would view that as normal, disciplining your wife was like disciplining your child. nowadays, they want all the benefits of that lifestyle with no concessions.

 

[kapri]

probably. Everyone who voted no is probably a normie.

Tbh I do think I'm a mentalcel and looks wise-LTN.
And unless you're EXTREMELY fugly or VERY autistic, finding and talking MTB is kind of bound to happened back then, because people would just go out, and do shit. They kinda didn't have a choice but to be around you. Today everything is premeditated, everyone exists online and people can just stay home and avoid you.

 

[kapri]

this is the most blackpilling part of modern society in terms of sexual access & gender dynamics. they can cock carousel from 13-28, then once they get too fat for Chad to waste his weekends railing, they wanna demand this fantasy 'traditional man' who pays the bills, has her not work, allows her to do whatever she wants, and then comes home & is 'emotionally available' to her constant bitching & moaning.
In reality, that era was based because the traditional man actually had power. If your wife was nagging your ear off in the presence of company and you slapped her, the general society would view that as normal, disciplining your wife was like disciplining your child. nowadays, they want all the benefits of that lifestyle with no concessions.

Men aren't lacking power they lack purpose and vigor.
We are 100% in power and we are the ones simping and enabling foids. Foids are worthless only because they are spoiled. The reason they have it easy is because we have it hard. Now that we've let "women be men", instead of "men becoming women" (in a sense where we get the same benefits socially as women-no more coldness and disregard, no more women and children first, no more protector and provider, no more man up, no more figure it out etc, no more 80-20 rule etc.) We are expecting the men to be men^2. The average man is expected to be the top 1% superman that is also the source of all evil and must repent and serve for nothing.

 

[Q. H. Cooks]

Yes, but certainly closer to ascension than now.

 

[Rapistcel]

The virginity rate for young men back then was only around 7%, now it's over 20% and going up. Back then you had to actually be a really ugly freak or very autistic in order to be an incel. There were no dating apps and social media around for females to pick between thousands of men, most of them would have to go for their looksmatch. And there was no feminism encouraging females to be hypergamous bitches. Because of the greatly increased standards in looks and money a lot of men that are incel today that wouldn't be back then.

yes because arranged marriages werent common anymore

 

[Animecel2D]

Definitely

 

[Zionist]

You phrased it incorrectly, the question should be " if you were a young man in the 70s do you think you'd still be an incel?"

 

[Zionist]

Yes because of my social problems. There are bachelors in my area from all age groups.
Btw when you say "born in the 70's".
That could just be a 25yo in 2003, society wasn't all that different in 2003, I do remember it.

He phrased it incorrectly, he meant " if you were a young man in the 70s"

 

[Zionist]

We are 100% in power

No we are not, women are in power, women rule society,

 

[blackpillforever]

yes because arranged marriages werent common anymore

Most guys could get a gf without it being arranged, there was much less hypergamy back then.

 

[blackpillforever]

He phrased it incorrectly, he meant " if you were a young man in the 70s"

No even if we're talking about the 90s and early 2000s it was way better back then compared to now. I was thinking of 1970 so you would start dating in like 1986, the dating market was much more fair back then.

 

[Zionist]

No even if we're talking about the 90s and early 2000s it was way better back then compared to now. I was thinking of 1970 so you would start dating in like 1986, the dating market was much more fair back then.

I wish I was born in 1945 tbh, or even 1943, I would have lived through the 60s & 70s arguably the best decades in modern history

 

[Wither]

I think, hypergamy was way lower but it wouldn’t help in my case

 

[ParasiteToSociety]

I would still be incel regardless.

 

[gymletethnicel]

probably. Everyone who voted no is probably a normie.

 

[kapri]

No we are not, women are in power, women rule society,

Read the post you fucking retard

 

[Zionist]

Read the post you fucking retard

Fuck off. I ain't reading sheet

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

Definitely, I was always the weird outcast to a level that a little lower average amount of virginity around me wouldn't have changed.

 

[Mango]

Maybe in my shitty turd world homelands but not the west. 5’4 is still shit height

But I also have 3/10 face. So idk if me living in another time/country would make a big difference