Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Women's past partners could alter the genetics for their future children

idkwattodowithlife

idkwattodowithlife

Banned
-
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
7,476
There was a study where they took some fruit flies, a few males, and females. They also used body size as a catalyst (or determinant) to observe some of the changes to their offsprings epi-genetically. What they find is that when the female fruit fly had some her past mates as smaller in size, but bred with a bigger fruit fly is that the fruit flies of that offspring turned out to be smaller than expected. 

And Vice versa with the other female flies having her past partners being bigger flies (but bred with a small male fruit fly, and their offsprings turned out to be bigger than their father).

I guess this all comes to the matter of altering ones genetics. 

If there's any mistakes, feel free to correct.

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/11133203/Could-previous-lovers-influence-appearance-of-future-children.html
 
"MUH PRSONAL FREEDOM"

Yet another reason premarital sex is degenerate. We should simply force people to marry young (Think teens, like MANY prior civilizations did)so that we don't have to deal with this. The whole idea of getting fucked/fucking 15 people before your spouse is just absurd.
 
ItheIthe said:
"MUH PRSONAL FREEDOM"
Yet another reason premarital sex is degenerate. We should simply force people to marry young (Think teens, like MANY prior civilizations did)so that we don't have to deal with this. The whole idea of getting fucked/fucking 15 people before your spouse is just absurd.
Yes, premartial sex is degenerate.

The teenage hormones are buzzing and yes I do agree with you, perhaps they have to get married around those ages, to tame their lust, sexual desires, and urges.

Her past partners could impact of how your child could look like.

God bless and may Christ be with you <3.
 
ItheIthe said:
"MUH PRSONAL FREEDOM"

Yet another reason premarital sex is degenerate. We should simply force people to marry young (Think teens, like MANY prior civilizations did)so that we don't have to deal with this. The whole idea of getting fucked/fucking 15 people before your spouse is just absurd.
 
BTW I also think it's ridiculous how people wait until 26-28 to marry. I'm not saying that you should abstain until then. I think people should get married young and then abstinence would be very reasonable.

The whole idea of "settling" after her and I have already had a million different experiences with numerous different people just repulses me. I'd rather ride through ALL my life with one girl, not sift around and then "settle"
 
idkwattodowithlife said:
There was a study where they took some fruit flies, a few males, and females. They also used body size as a catalyst (or determinant) to observe some of the changes to their offsprings epi-genetically. What they find is that when the female fruit fly had some her past mates as smaller in size, but bred with a bigger fruit fly is that the fruit flies of that offspring turned out to be smaller than expected. 

And Vice versa with the other female flies having her past partners being bigger flies (but bred with a small male fruit fly, and their offsprings turned out to be bigger than their father).

I guess this all comes to the matter of altering ones genetics. 

If there's any mistakes, feel free to correct.

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/11133203/Could-previous-lovers-influence-appearance-of-future-children.html
Flies are not mammals but humans are, there's a difference in how offspring are conceived.
 
Juxtaposition6 said:
idkwattodowithlife said:
There was a study where they took some fruit flies, a few males, and females. They also used body size as a catalyst (or determinant) to observe some of the changes to their offsprings epi-genetically. What they find is that when the female fruit fly had some her past mates as smaller in size, but bred with a bigger fruit fly is that the fruit flies of that offspring turned out to be smaller than expected.
And Vice versa with the other female flies having her past partners being bigger flies (but bred with a small male fruit fly, and their offsprings turned out to be bigger than their father).
I guess this all comes to the matter of altering ones genetics.
If there's any mistakes, feel free to correct.
Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/11133203/Could-previous-lovers-influence-appearance-of-future-children.html
Flies are not mammals but humans are, there's a difference in how offspring are conceived.

shhh
 
ItheIthe said:
BTW I also think it's ridiculous how people wait until 26-28 to marry. I'm not saying that you should abstain until then. I think people should get married young and then abstinence would be very reasonable.
The whole idea of "settling" after her and I have already had a million different experiences with numerous different people just repulses me. I'd rather ride through ALL my life with one girl, not sift around and then "settle"
And that's more of the reasons why people should get married younger, yes, you're right on the money.

The whole "settling" thing is BS, no bad behavior or doings, shouldn't be excused.

Yeah, monogamy is the way to go (lesser chance of cheating, divorces, or BS involved), and also stuff those polygamist losers (their life will come crushing down someday and they be burning in hell for their mistakes).

Also interesting fact? Do you know most IT users are polygamists or are in open relationships? Hearing some of the stuff their saying is suicide fuel, or rather rage fuel.
 
SeifEsteem said:
tell us about how female horses abort
Jump belly-first into those horse competition poles.
 
We are not flies and they are much simpler organisms. Mammal studies are somewhat valid to humans but only in certain fields and to a certain extent.
 
SeifEsteem said:
Juxtaposition6 said:
SeifEsteem said:
No, i shall tell the secret.
tell us about how female horses abort
Nothing 100% guaranteed, of course.

But biology has it ways.

There's always going to be some level of errors involved, especially when it comes to science, and research.

Nothing is perfect.
 
You should always link the original study from a scientific journal / pubmed because reading articles is painful
 
idkwattodowithlife said:
SeifEsteem said:
Juxtaposition6 said:
SeifEsteem said:
No, i shall tell the secret.
tell us about how female horses abort
Nothing 100% guaranteed, of course.
But biology has it ways.
There's always going to be some level of errors involved, especially when it comes to science, and research.
Nothing is perfect.

why are u quoting me
 
Facade said:
We are not flies and they are much simpler organisms. Mammal studies are somewhat valid to humans but only in certain fields and to a certain extent.
 
idkwattodowithlife said:
And that's more of the reasons why people should get married younger, yes, you're right on the money.

The whole "settling" thing is BS, no bad behavior or doings, shouldn't be excused.

Yeah, monogamy is the way to go (lesser chance of cheating, divorces, or BS involved), and also stuff those polygamist losers (their life will come crushing down someday and they be burning in hell for their mistakes).

Also interesting fact? Do you know most IT users are polygamists or are in open relationships? Hearing some of the stuff their saying is suicide fuel, or rather rage fuel.

Yeah, I actually made a whole thread of their quotes. Most "poly" women are ugly women mad that they missed on on the "teenage dream" and now they want to make up for it by being faithless whores and banging any good looking guy possible.  

BTW I don't believe in "Hell" in the traditional sense; "Hell" was interchangeable with "Sheol" and meant grave. What many Christians get confused on is Gehenna and "The Lake of Fire" spoken of in Revelation, which are real things. Don't get me wrong, there are still "fiery" consequences for the actions of the wicked. PM me if you want me to go on longer.
 
Looksmaxxing and moneymaxxing to import a barely legal non white virgin from a respectable culture. Not dealing with "settling" for a used up rotton skank.
 
I give up.

i-dont-know-stock-photo_csp14200629.jpg
 
I wish this happened... that way I could be a chad instead of a truecel
 
First of all why would you even care.
Secondly this is pure cope as we have zero females regardless. We are not.choosing anything.
 
ItheIthe said:
"MUH PRSONAL FREEDOM"

Yet another reason premarital sex is degenerate. We should simply force people to marry young (Think teens, like MANY prior civilizations did)so that we don't have to deal with this. The whole idea of getting fucked/fucking 15 people before your spouse is just absurd.

Sounds like premarital sex with Chad could actually be beneficial for the baby if the woman ends up settling with a beta provider. Maybe the baby would turn out more Chadlike than expected.
 
While telegony hasn't been shown in mammals, like most are saying, it is an advantageous adaptation, so you never know. Could have some say in mammalian reproduction. Maybe not by the same mechanism, but nature has a lot of ways to skin the cat.
 
for all the copecels out there, the thing he's talking about is called "Microchimerism" and it HAS been observed to happen within humans.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top