Okay first thing first i should point out the importance of the mother and daughter slut bond; women especially attractive sluts would want to have an identically privileged daughters possessing high socio-sexual values or ones that would essentially surpasses their own attractiveness and sociosexuality; thus why they would only procreate with the most perceived physically attractive men ''chads and ethical equivalents'' to further ensure the continuation of their whoring legacy! its all part of the
parental investment theory.
(logically speaking a slut that has enjoyed ridding the dicks of chads and living on tutorial mode without having to earn a thing would want nothing less for her daughters, they're the rightful successors of her whoring legacy! thus the importance of looks-based hypergamy)
and for attractive women the odds of having daughters are skyrocketing ''
implication of the generalized Trivers-Willard hypothesis (gTWH)'':
Young Americans who are rated “very attractive” have roughly a 44% chance of having a son for their first child (and thus a 56% chance of having a daughter). In contrast, everyone else has roughly a 52% chance of having a son (and thus a 48% chance of having a daughter) for their first child. Being “very attractive” increases the odds of having a daughter by 36% or decreases the odds of having a son by 26%!
its no wonder that evolution is driving women to become more attractive; as science has indeed indicated
While men remain as aesthetically unappealing as their caveman ancestors.
According to a series of studies of physical attractiveness and its links to reproductive success in humans, researchers found that pretty women have more children than their plainer counterparts and that a higher proportion of those children are female. Those daughters, once adult, also tend to be attractive and so repeat the pattern.
In the research, Markus Jokela, a researcher at the University of Helsinki, found beautiful women had up to 16 percent more children than their plainer counterparts.
To reach the conclusion, Jokela used data gathered in America, in which 1,244 women and 997 men were followed through four decades of life, reports The Times.
‘sexy daughters’ phenomenon:
Evolutionary biology has sex bias here, since selection is usually couched in terms of male-trait inheritance.
in a study it was found that:
– women will choose the most attractive of the men who are available and attainable. women who choose feminine men may benefit in the first generation when the female offspring be attractive.
this phenomenon was illustrated through the following study:
R.E. Cornwell & D.I. Perrett (2008)
what we found was a clear relationship between the attractiveness of the daughters and their parents. If you inspect Figure 6.3, you should be able to match parents and offspring through their average appearances.
Note that each face depicts not one person but a composite of fifteen people. To make these images, we sorted families according to the parents’ attractiveness.
We then identified the fifteen families in the collection in which the mums and dads scored highest in their combined attractiveness rating, and blended them to give composite images: one of the fifteen mums from the attractive couples, the other of the fifteen dads. Similarly we made composites from fifteen less attractive couples. As you may have guessed,
mum and dad tended to be similar in attractiveness
competition for partners leads to
matching in attractiveness. From the four composite parent faces, therefore, you should be able to choose which blend of dads is married to which blend of mums – one blended dad and
one blended mum are better-looking than their counterparts. (The right couple represent the partners in the couples whom our judges decided were better-looking. Do you agree with them?) Interesting as this exercise may be, all it
tells us is that attractive women marry attractive men.
