Blackpill Women swiftly insist on constraints/ distractions... exaggerate them, even when they're minuscule. When they don't like you.

[Pinpoint]

"Hey, I'm replying to a few peeps"
"Oh maybe we should stop talking then rn".
Exaggerationing is a thing women do. They claw and pry for anyhting to stop the conversation, because she is falsely representing herself as a burden by thinking she is being one.
When in reality she knwos htat if a guy is talking to her while pressured that she means something to her.
She just wnats to cut the conversation short because she doesn't want the guy to express that she means something to him, or when he is giving signalizations of respect... she has to find another method by which to exit the conversation. By exaggerating her urden.
While she'd probably wait on chad, or chadlite.

 

[acnescarcel]

lol exaggerationing signalizations

 

[Pinpoint]

lol exaggerationing signalizations

exaggerationing is a suitable verb for how women distort shit.
Your negatives, or the positives of why things are better to get away from you, or go with someone else.

 

[Guest2]

Exaggerationing

signalizations

Sometimes you make me laugh man. Still a high effort and IQ post, though.

 

[Pinpoint]

They signalize all kinds of things with the way they are posing themselves out (manipulation) (false outward representation/ potrayal), or with the representation of the situation, or anything really.

 

[turbocuckcel_7000]

 

[Michael15651]

They signalize all kinds of things with the way they are posing themselves out (manipulation) (false outward representation/ potrayal), or with the representation of the situation, or anything really.

You aren’t wrong.

 

[Diet_Choke]

"Hey, I'm replying to a few peeps"
"Oh maybe we should stop talking then rn".
Exaggerationing is a thing women do. They claw and pry for anyhting to stop the conversation

That's actually kind of a shit test but not really.

It's considered rude/disrespectful to not give someone your undivided attention.

She is saying, "Give me your undivided attention." Not trying to stop the conversation.

 

[Pinpoint]

That's actually kind of a shit test but not really.

It's considered rude/disrespectful to not give someone your undivided attention.

She is saying, "Give me your undivided attention." Not trying to stop the conversation.

I should mention the context where I'm replying a lot, and only have a few breaks.
And I said it was for legitimate business/ law.
So she is continually trying to exaggerate the contraint rather than see my side.
All other contexts indicate respect on my behalf. But something legitimately important taking my time.
Shit test or not, if I succeed it, she could go away. Remember, I don't have any primal ties to this person in particular.
SHE WOULD ONLY SHIT TEST IF THERE WAS A DESIRE TO COME TO ME.

 

[Diet_Choke]

I should mention the context where I'm replying a lot, and only have a few breaks.
And I said it was for legitimate business/ law.
So she is continually trying to exaggerate the contraint rather than see my side.
All other contexts indicate respect on my behalf. But something legitimately important taking my time.
Shit test or not, if I succeed it, she could go away. Remember, I don't have any primal ties to this person in particular.
SHE WOULD ONLY SHIT TEST IF THERE WAS A DESIRE TO COME TO ME.

Wait so

The other texts you were getting were business?
Or the woman you were talking to was business?
Or both?

 

[Pinpoint]

Wait so

The other texts you were getting were business?
Or the woman you were talking to was business?
Or both?

mine. that was my constraint.

 

[Deleted member 15752]

You aren’t wrong.