Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Women left swipe ("ewww") 27'000 out of 30'000 men on tinder

  • Thread starter Bangkok or bust
  • Start date
Bangkok or bust

Bangkok or bust

A life of poorer quality due to skull & bones
-
Joined
Mar 22, 2018
Posts
4,173
1n4rnqgivha31.png


Only 3000 out of 30'000 men make the looks threshold. And this is for Stacey's, beckies and fat ugly girls. Not just hotties.
 
There are many other easy ways to obtain women

20200430 142413
 
And some of them claim to be femcels JFL.
 
And some of them claim to be femcels JFL.

Femcels say will date a 5/10 male, but this study of female app behaviours proves otherwise.

If 5/10 guys were attractive enough, it would be 15'000 men out of 30'000, not a measly 3000. 8/10, 7/10 rule in action.
 
If I remember correctly, this was a 5/10 hapa looking toilet who lived in a Scandinavian country. Imagine if even Nordic chads aren't good enough for her.
 
If I remember correctly, this was a 5/10 hapa looking toilet who lived in a Scandinavian country. Imagine if even Nordic chads aren't good enough for her.
Brutal
 
1n4rnqgivha31.png


Only 3000 out of 30'000 men make the looks threshold. And this is for Stacey's, beckies and fat ugly girls. Not just hotties.
Brutal. Imagine have a 1 in 30,000 chance that your tinder match turns into something long-term. OVER
 
Brutal. Imagine have a 1 in 30,000 chance that your tinder match turns into something long-term. OVER
That would be 1 in 3600. See, it's not that bad.
 
I knew Tinder is waste of time I just didn't know how much
Brutal. Imagine have a 1 in 30,000 chance that your tinder match turns into something long-term. OVER
Only 3 people getting date is even more brutal
 
That would be 1 in 3600. See, it's not that bad.
The people that she swiped right on didn't end up getting anything either. How does it make a difference if you get rejected from the start over getting rejected later because at the end of the day they all up getting rejected. It's the difference between normie and incel. The incel gets rejected right away while the normie gets led on so he can pay for her drinks and then she rejects him.
 
Brutal stats. I'd like to see some stats for Chad.
 
Brutal stats. I'd like to see some stats for Chad.

10/10 Chads will scope down to 5/10 women if she's got a nice body or petite. She'll be his "plate". Some good looking cats will even bang a few 4/10 chubbsters for the novelty.
 
10/10 Chads will scope down to 5/10 women if she's got a nice body or petite. She'll be his "plate". Some good looking cats will even bang a few 4/10 chubbsters for the novelty.
That's true. Some chads actually fuck landwhales, wtf.
 
"sillly misogynistic bad inkel, that's why you deserve to be treated like that!"
:soy::soy::soy:
 
1n4rnqgivha31.png


Only 3000 out of 30'000 men make the looks threshold. And this is for Stacey's, beckies and fat ugly girls. Not just hotties.
So they reject 90% of men if we turn that to a percentage. Damn.
 
So they reject 90% of men if we turn that to a percentage. Damn.

Actually if they narrow it down from 30'000 men to 3000, and then only dating 5 of that 3000 get a date, it's even smaller odds. 0.00167%.
 
So, let's crack some numbers, shall we? Unless you pay for premium tinder, you can only swipe 100 times a day, so considering she swiped 100x a day, every single day, she spent 300 days swiping on tinder just to have 5 dates, that's about 0,000016667% rate of dates per swipe, and she only dated 1 guy long term, that's about 0,000003333% dates per swipe.

Now, taking into consideration that Tinder is heavily geared towards looks, we can safely assume that this one guy she's dating is, at the very least, above-average looking. That's the extent that women are willing to go just to get Chad.
 
So, let's crack some numbers, shall we? Unless you pay for premium tinder, you can only swipe 100 times a day, so considering she swiped 100x a day, every single day, she spent 300 days swiping on tinder just to have 5 dates, that's about 0,000016667% rate of dates per swipe, and she only dated 1 guy long term, that's about 0,000003333% dates per swipe.

Now, taking into consideration that Tinder is heavily geared towards looks, we can safely assume that this one guy she's dating is, at the very least, above-average looking. That's the extent that women are willing to go just to get Chad.


200.gif
 
9/10 rule

And I cannot believe it's that high tbh. I've seen fugly noodle whores with a right swipe % of like 0.04 and they had swipe numbers in the tens of thousands
So, let's crack some numbers, shall we? Unless you pay for premium tinder, you can only swipe 100 times a day, so considering she swiped 100x a day, every single day, she spent 300 days swiping on tinder just to have 5 dates, that's about 0,000016667% rate of dates per swipe, and she only dated 1 guy long term, that's about 0,000003333% dates per swipe.

Now, taking into consideration that Tinder is heavily geared towards looks, we can safely assume that this one guy she's dating is, at the very least, above-average looking. That's the extent that women are willing to go just to get Chad.
A 10% right swipe rate is actually high for women as well on tinder.
 
Even legit Chads have like a 10% match rate or something (this is extremely high for a male on tinder). Women are just too goddamn picky
 

Similar threads

Mixedcel59
Replies
8
Views
1K
ogercel
ogercel
BlackLowLtn
Replies
21
Views
765
nakolas
nakolas
P
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fatalistocrat
Fatalistocrat
Exalted Monarch
Replies
10
Views
1K
no love found
N

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top