Bangkok or bust
A life of poorer quality due to skull & bones
-
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2018
- Posts
- 4,173
Only 3000 out of 30'000 men make the looks threshold. And this is for Stacey's, beckies and fat ugly girls. Not just hotties.
And some of them claim to be femcels JFL.
But worth repeatingOld news.
BrutalIf I remember correctly, this was a 5/10 hapa looking toilet who lived in a Scandinavian country. Imagine if even Nordic chads aren't good enough for her.
elab
once again the very based gorillacel hits us with his wisdom
And some of them claim to be femcels JFL.
Brutal. Imagine have a 1 in 30,000 chance that your tinder match turns into something long-term. OVER![]()
Only 3000 out of 30'000 men make the looks threshold. And this is for Stacey's, beckies and fat ugly girls. Not just hotties.
That would be 1 in 3600. See, it's not that bad.Brutal. Imagine have a 1 in 30,000 chance that your tinder match turns into something long-term. OVER
Only 3 people getting date is even more brutalBrutal. Imagine have a 1 in 30,000 chance that your tinder match turns into something long-term. OVER
The people that she swiped right on didn't end up getting anything either. How does it make a difference if you get rejected from the start over getting rejected later because at the end of the day they all up getting rejected. It's the difference between normie and incel. The incel gets rejected right away while the normie gets led on so he can pay for her drinks and then she rejects him.That would be 1 in 3600. See, it's not that bad.
Brutal stats. I'd like to see some stats for Chad.
That's true. Some chads actually fuck landwhales, wtf.10/10 Chads will scope down to 5/10 women if she's got a nice body or petite. She'll be his "plate". Some good looking cats will even bang a few 4/10 chubbsters for the novelty.
So they reject 90% of men if we turn that to a percentage. Damn.![]()
Only 3000 out of 30'000 men make the looks threshold. And this is for Stacey's, beckies and fat ugly girls. Not just hotties.
So they reject 90% of men if we turn that to a percentage. Damn.
So, let's crack some numbers, shall we? Unless you pay for premium tinder, you can only swipe 100 times a day, so considering she swiped 100x a day, every single day, she spent 300 days swiping on tinder just to have 5 dates, that's about 0,000016667% rate of dates per swipe, and she only dated 1 guy long term, that's about 0,000003333% dates per swipe.
Now, taking into consideration that Tinder is heavily geared towards looks, we can safely assume that this one guy she's dating is, at the very least, above-average looking. That's the extent that women are willing to go just to get Chad.
A 10% right swipe rate is actually high for women as well on tinder.So, let's crack some numbers, shall we? Unless you pay for premium tinder, you can only swipe 100 times a day, so considering she swiped 100x a day, every single day, she spent 300 days swiping on tinder just to have 5 dates, that's about 0,000016667% rate of dates per swipe, and she only dated 1 guy long term, that's about 0,000003333% dates per swipe.
Now, taking into consideration that Tinder is heavily geared towards looks, we can safely assume that this one guy she's dating is, at the very least, above-average looking. That's the extent that women are willing to go just to get Chad.





