Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

TeeHee Women Have Killed One Billion People In a Hundred Years—All For The Sake Of Their Own Convenience [Irrefutable Proof of Women's Evil]

The Scarlet Prince

The Scarlet Prince

The Devil's Advocate
-
Joined
May 22, 2024
Posts
7,808
In our modern society, one of the most controversial talking points is regarding abortion. We often find ourselves hearing about it so much—whether it be through debates, discussions from female family members, or just hearing about it in media—that we begin to become desensitized to it.

However, I want you to REALLY think about this for a second. For need I remind you that when a foid decides to terminate her own pregnancy, that is someone that would have grown up and lived an entire future for themselves? That person's memories, their future experiences, their struggles, their feelings they would experience, their opinions, their likes and dislikes, their name, their life—it is all obliterated in just a second, before they ever had a fair shot.

No, instead, they have the very source of life cut off from them, and then their body parts dismembered and vacuumed out piece by piece—all to just be thrown into the trash and to die off, with no trace of their life ever being lived.

And at the heart of it all, who lies responsible? The mother who had decided to kill her own child before she had even named them. Yet, why? Why is it that she would do such a thing? The large majority of the time, the answer is simply 'because she didn't want the responsibility nor struggle of having a child.'

That is their justification for robbing the future away from a being that would have had it sprawled before them—ripe with the comedies and tragedies that laid in wait for them in the theater we call 'life.'

The WHO reports that roughly 73 million abortions occur annually, with the inclusion of illegal and unreported abortions. Even with the assumption that only a portion of these are terminations of pregnancies, even a figure of 50 million is a grim toll. That is to say, World War Two was the greatest war that mankind had inflicted upon itself, leading to the deaths of roughly 70 million people. However, I'd like to remind you that the war took a total of six years to conclude.

In a single year, the amount of abortions stands toe to toe with the death toll that had been brought about by WWII, and then far surpasses it with a consecutive year.

Given a decade, roughly 800 million abortions are likely to happen within that time. That is nearly a billion people who have perished, all for the crime of being unwanted.

Foids are cowards, they hide their malice and sinister sadism behind a veneer of forged empathy, only to drop it when faced with the choice of a theoretical hardship, or a human life. Then they have no qualms with picking on and culling the beings unable to fight back or voice their distress and pain.

Vile creatures.
 
People should just use birth control properly instead of getting abortions, but I guess some people might think differently
 
Proof that women are horrible people
 
dnr + water
Oh, I tried to keep it shorter this time. And I thought it was a good topic to discuss, because honestly you don't see it really discussed enough considering how well it serves as proof of women being evil, unempathetic, creatures.
 
Abortion
Abortion2
Abortion3
 
yes, people have sex and have babies and I don't
 
My wife was aborted and sacrificed to moloch
 
I read what you wrote in full, and it is well put. But I have a question for you: is anyone entitled to life? I do not think so.

I say this because I support eugenics, and I am in partial agreement with antinatalism. There are cases where abortion makes sense. If the child will be born with grave abnormalities, then ending it is a mercy. In other cases, where the reason is convenience, I still do not believe it is so simple as calling the mother a coward. Think of the child born to a woman who never wanted it, who has neither the means nor the patience to raise it. What future does that child have? Likely neglect, resentment, or a life of hardship that could have been avoided.

We need to move past the idea that every human life must be preserved no matter what. Life in itself is not a gift, it is a condition, and it can just as easily be a curse. There are countless lives lived in misery, want, and dysfunction, where the person never had a real chance at fulfillment or peace. And you, of all people, should know this. You are posting on a forum for incels. Your life, like the lives of many here, is not great. I am sure many here have wished they were never born, as I have, and I have seen more than a few express thoughts of suicide.
 
Total foid death
 
I read what you wrote in full, and it is well put. But I have a question for you: is anyone entitled to life? I do not think so.
An aborted child could have a pretty decent life though. Foid's decision to abort is caused by her want, not by some constructive philosophy of life. Otherwise, I agree with you, and I think that assisted suicide should be legalized for all people -- not only for those who are considered to be "suffering" by those who don't.
 
High IQ. The abortion is underappreciated even in because of the nihilistic tendencies but is one of the most brutal pills. Foids don't care about privacy, only convenience in seeking chad, this is why foids still using the tea app.

Total abortion ban.
 
I still do not believe it is so simple as calling the mother a coward.
Holy soy! These foids abort to party with chads since they go on to spawn more incels in the future with their betabuxxers. You are fucking defending harlots and their evil and irresponsible behaviors. If foids weren't such harlots, there'd be FAR less need for aborting, saving the state billions in dollars.
Besides, aborting doesn't mean the child inside the womb doesn't suffer. Have you fucking seen how abortion is done. Fucking coward foid-woshipping soytard piece of human feces. Go kys if you think nobody is entitled to life. You can't because you're a coward piece of shit.

You all "anti-natalists" are just foid-worshipping and pussywhipped bitches. Aborting being not as bad as killing a newborn child is just soyciety's value judgement. You all adhering to that judgement just shows how little how you actually care about anti-natalism and how MUCH you care about foids' conveniences in regard to her getting back blown out by chad the same night after having an abortion.
 
Last edited:
Holy soy! These foids abort to party with chads since they go on to spawn more incels in the future with their betabuxxers. You are fucking defending harlots and their evil and irresponsible behaviors. If foids weren't such harlots, there'd be FAR less need for aborting, saving the state billions in dollars.
Besides, aborting doesn't mean the child inside the womb doesn't suffer. Have you fucking seen how abortion is done. Fucking coward foid-woshipping soytard piece of human feces. Go kys if you think nobody is entitled to life. You can't because you're a coward piece of shit.

You all "anti-natalists" are just foid-worshipping and pussywhipped bitches. Aborting being not as bad as killing a newborn child is just soyciety's value judgement. You all adhering to that judgement just shows how little how you actually care about anti-natalism and how MUCH you care about foids' conveniences in regard to her getting back blown out by chad the same night after having an abortion.

Calm yourself. I hate women and their whoring around as much as you do. Nothing I wrote was meant to defend them. I know they abort mostly for convenience, because they would rather get back to drinking and chasing Chad than face responsibility. I despise them for it too.

But you are missing the point. I am saying that not every life is worth living. Think about the child born to a woman who never wanted it, who resents it, who leaves it neglected or grows it up in misery. That is not a life anyone would want, and it is better not to force it into the world at all. Abortion in those cases spares the child a future of suffering.

You and I both know women are harlots. On that we agree. Where we differ is that I do not see bringing more unwanted children into the world as a victory. It just creates more broken homes, more dysfunction, and more misery. If you hate women, then recognize the damage they do when they have children they never wanted in the first place.
 
I read what you wrote in full, and it is well put. But I have a question for you: is anyone entitled to life? I do not think so.

I say this because I support eugenics, and I am in partial agreement with antinatalism. There are cases where abortion makes sense. If the child will be born with grave abnormalities, then ending it is a mercy. In other cases, where the reason is convenience, I still do not believe it is so simple as calling the mother a coward. Think of the child born to a woman who never wanted it, who has neither the means nor the patience to raise it. What future does that child have? Likely neglect, resentment, or a life of hardship that could have been avoided.

We need to move past the idea that every human life must be preserved no matter what. Life in itself is not a gift, it is a condition, and it can just as easily be a curse. There are countless lives lived in misery, want, and dysfunction, where the person never had a real chance at fulfillment or peace. And you, of all people, should know this. You are posting on a forum for incels. Your life, like the lives of many here, is not great. I am sure many here have wished they were never born, as I have, and I have seen more than a few express thoughts of suicide.
Being an unwanted child is certainly tough, it's not like I'm denying that. However, I just can't help but fundamentally disagree with anti-natalism. I suppose, if one really wishes to simplify it down, it really can just be a matter of perspective. Does one think that it is better to have lived, even if in misery—or to never have comprehended what 'life' is, a story never told, a novel never wrote? I lean towards the former, which is why I disagree with anti-natalism. I would rather have been in my circumstances that I have now, and even worse, than have never had understood what it means to live.

I really don't want to sound like some dimwitted optimist, but I can't help but think that, even through all the suffering I go through—there's some things in my life that really bring me joy, even if brief. And I'm literally saying that as a 5'3 incel.

Eventually, I will turn to dust, just as everything must—and I will die alone, as is the fate of most here. However, before I died, I got to learn about the world, its history, the fictional stories and tales forged by authors, my favorite foods, and a plethora of other things. That's why I'm still grateful for life, even if I'm the bottom of the barrel in practically every manner.

And yet, imagine if I were simply killed before it all, never getting to experience any of it. Cut off and ripped from the world, all because my mother didn't want to deal with having me due to her own actions—for her own convienence. How truly vile.

None of that is to say that I don't think what you mentioned has merit, because it does. However, instead of foids getting to use that classic anti-natalism argument to hide behind their selfish and sadistic actions—I think instead that assisted suicide should be argued for. Even though I still don't fully agree with it, at least it is the person themselves who has made the decision to no longer live.

But really, that's just what I think...
 
They need to pay reparations. All foids under 25 should become sex slaves to incels.
 
Shit is so fucking rage inducing. They don't even feel guilt or remorse from it, instead they feel pride.
 
Being an unwanted child is certainly tough, it's not like I'm denying that. However, I just can't help but fundamentally disagree with anti-natalism. I suppose, if one really wishes to simplify it down, it really can just be a matter of perspective. Does one think that it is better to have lived, even if in misery—or to never have comprehended what 'life' is, a story never told, a novel never wrote? I lean towards the former, which is why I disagree with anti-natalism. I would rather have been in my circumstances that I have now, and even worse, than have never had understood what it means to live.

I really don't want to sound like some dimwitted optimist, but I can't help but think that, even through all the suffering I go through—there's some things in my life that really bring me joy, even if brief. And I'm literally saying that as a 5'3 incel.

Eventually, I will turn to dust, just as everything must—and I will die alone, as is the fate of most here. However, before I died, I got to learn about the world, its history, the fictional stories and tales forged by authors, my favorite foods, and a plethora of other things. That's why I'm still grateful for life, even if I'm the bottom of the barrel in practically every manner.

And yet, imagine if I were simply killed before it all, never getting to experience any of it. Cut off and ripped from the world, all because my mother didn't want to deal with having me due to her own actions—for her own convienence. How truly vile.

None of that is to say that I don't think what you mentioned has merit, because it does. However, instead of foids getting to use that classic anti-natalism argument to hide behind their selfish and sadistic actions—I think instead that assisted suicide should be argued for. Even though I still don't fully agree with it, at least it is the person themselves who has made the decision to no longer live.

But really, that's just what I think...

Thank you for taking the time to respond so thoughtfully.

I said that I am in partial agreement with antinatalism, and I chose that wording deliberately. I do not hold that life is in every case worse than nonexistence. I accept that there are satisfactions to be had, even in difficult circumstances. To see, to learn, and to know certain pleasures is not nothing. On that point I agree with you.

What I question is the belief that every life must be preserved no matter what. Life is not always good. Many are born into misery, illness, or neglect. For them, existence is more of a burden than anything else. To insist that such lives must go on regardless does not seem reasonable to me. On that point too, I agree with you: assisted suicide should be available to those who decide their own lives are no longer worth living.

I also want to be clear: I am not defending women so much as I am defending abortion. I know abortion is often chosen for selfish reasons. It is rarely for the child; it is for the mother. Even so, I think it is better that abortion happens than that unwanted children are born only to suffer.

For many, joy is rare, and when it comes it is so brief that it leaves little behind. Most of the world lives in poverty or poor health. Few ever have what could be called a "good life," whatever that may mean. That is why I cannot accept the claim that every birth is good, or that fleeting moments of happiness are enough to balance years of misery.
 
They have an abortion fetish ngl, getting pregnant and then killing the poor child.
 
I read what you wrote in full, and it is well put. But I have a question for you: is anyone entitled to life? I do not think so.

I say this because I support eugenics, and I am in partial agreement with antinatalism. There are cases where abortion makes sense. If the child will be born with grave abnormalities, then ending it is a mercy. In other cases, where the reason is convenience, I still do not believe it is so simple as calling the mother a coward. Think of the child born to a woman who never wanted it, who has neither the means nor the patience to raise it. What future does that child have? Likely neglect, resentment, or a life of hardship that could have been avoided.

We need to move past the idea that every human life must be preserved no matter what. Life in itself is not a gift, it is a condition, and it can just as easily be a curse. There are countless lives lived in misery, want, and dysfunction, where the person never had a real chance at fulfillment or peace. And you, of all people, should know this. You are posting on a forum for incels. Your life, like the lives of many here, is not great. I am sure many here have wished they were never born, as I have, and I have seen more than a few express thoughts of suicide.
You eloquently put what I thought when I read OP. I don't believe that forcing women to have children just for the sake of life is viable reasoning. Conservatives have this life is amazing and wonderful, despite what circumstances you are born into you should cherish life and that you should be life affirmative! I do not agree with this notion, this line of thinking can cause great harm upon the offspring of those who believe in such idealism. I believe when conservatives argue against abortion it is them safe guarding their own world view they have adopted to make themselves feel more better about the world's unequality and brutality. I believe that the arguments made against come from protecting their own views and beliefs than any actual care about the children that are born. This is one of the irregular times I agree with Libreals on this issue. Life isn't a Disney merry-go-lucky world; it can be very brutal and painful, we as humans should not fall into nihilism but also not in manical idealism which can cause great suffering
 
Abortion is of the devil
 
This is good actually.
Abortion is highly eugenic and should be encouraged. Only Christcucks get mad about this.

When a woman gets an abortion, she is limiting the spread of her genes in the present. But abortions also hit future fertility, which is great. And think of the man's genes too: the guy that impregnated the bitch is probably a low IQ tard with low impulse control. Do you think future generations benefit from this?
And that's just the genetic impact.
Humans are a mix of genes and environment. Think of the environment the kid would grow up in, if born. A stupid worthless mother raising them, no father in sight.
These types of people being born result in higher crime rates. Just absolute animals stealing and killing until they get put down by the police in a Saint Floyd moment.
 

Similar threads

tulasdanslos
Replies
4
Views
581
kapri
kapri
RobertGarnicasAPedo
Replies
9
Views
781
introvertloner
introvertloner
Winnipeg Bellomasrt
Replies
13
Views
771
Kan>Foids
Kan>Foids

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →