Blackpill Women have 2x men’s bodycount. STI prevalence proves this.

[Man]

Women lie about their bodycounts obviously.

Women malinger even anonymous surveys, and you can track this by looking at something you CANT lie about, like STI prevalence.

If a woman says she has a bodycount of 6 it’s closer to 18.

Therefore the old rule of “take a woman’s purported bodycount and multiply it by 3” is actually accurate and not just and old and unreliable saying.


You COULD say this proves Hypergamy: if they’re all sleeping with the same men that have herpes because they fuck around so much, or you could say they just fuck 2-3x more than they say they do or about 2x what men do on average.

Either way Hypergamy is evident in medical literature and they even have their own cope for it “women are more susceptible to STDs” that’s the actual medical apologism.. they can’t get STDs from men that don’t have them so it’s not “susceptibility” it’s irresponsible sexual behavior and medicine bends over backwards to avoid this conclusion or don’t care to investigate the issue with any rigor because their explanation doesn’t even make sense.

 

[GeckoBus]

Women lie about their bodycounts obviously.

Women malinger even anonymous surveys, and you can track this by looking at something you CANT lie about, like STI prevalence.

If a woman says she has a bodycount of 6 it’s closer to 18.

Therefore the old rule of “take a woman’s purported bodycount and multiply it by 3” is actually accurate and not just and old and unreliable saying.


You COULD say this proves Hypergamy: if they’re all sleeping with the same men that have herpes because they fuck around so much, or you could say they just fuck 2-3x more than they say they do or about 2x what men do on average.

Either way Hypergamy is evident in medical literature and they even have their own cope for it “women are more susceptible to STDs” that’s the actual medical apologism.. they can’t get STDs from men that don’t have them so it’s not “susceptibility” it’s irresponsible sexual behavior and medicine bends over backwards to avoid this conclusion or don’t care to investigate the issue with any rigor because their explanation doesn’t even make sense.

View attachment 1726589View attachment 1726587

they try to dodge this one by claiming the female vagina makes women more susceptible to getting STDs because its like a petri dish whereas the guys dick is like a tunnel the STD has to crawl through like soldier crawling through vietcong tunnels until he can deploy C4 in your balls

its all cope, of course this is an after the fact attempt to explain the discrepancy in STD rates. Whenever any data reflects negatively on women, they add some cope statement about how we shouldnt jump to conclusions and so on. I think @The Notorious SLAV even said at some point, this is so prevalent that other researchers have picked up on it - the constant excuse making in research for women.
Some other threads here also talked about how womens body count goes up when they think they are on a lie detector:

An Old Thread Revisited (Women's body count doubles on fake lie-detectors)

The thread: https://incels.is/threads/womens-partner-count-doubled-when-they-thought-they-were-hooked-up-to-a-lie-detector.209222/ The Study it refers to: https://www.amherst.edu/media/view/239672/original/Alexander+%26+Fisher+%282003%29.pdf The Articles linked in the thread: a) Article about...

incels.is

Misandry, Not Misogyny, is Rampant in Society (Study)

Analysis finds that across the board, there is pro-female bias in society. - research findings that report favorably on male traits are viewed as less credible - research that reports unfavorably on women is viewed as less credible - pro-female bias is deliberately misconstrued as being harmful...

incels.is

Analysis finds that across the board, there is pro-female bias in society.

- research findings that report favorably on male traits are viewed as less credible
- research that reports unfavorably on women is viewed as less credible
- pro-female bias is deliberately misconstrued as being harmful to women (lul)
- etc.

Hiding sex differences: not a myth

Russell Warne has a new post: Implications of average group differences for the design of intelligence tests He writes: The implication is that if test creators can force an average difference to disappear for one pair of groups (i.e., males and females), then any differences or lack of differen

emilkirkegaard.dk

Hostile sexism is live and well, but mostly in favor of women

It's OK to be male

www.emilkirkegaard.com

 

[Man]

they try to dodge this one by claiming the female vagina makes women more susceptible to getting STDs because its like a petri dish whereas the guys dick is like a tunnel the STD has to crawl through like soldier crawling through vietcong tunnels until he can deploy C4 in your balls

It’s an honor to catch your attention, glad I’m not the only noticer

Thread blessed by the goat

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

they try to dodge this one by claiming the female vagina makes women more susceptible to getting STDs because its like a petri dish whereas the guys dick is like a tunnel the STD has to crawl through like soldier crawling through vietcong tunnels until he can deploy C4 in your balls

Epic analogy.

its all cope, of course this is an after the fact attempt to explain the discrepancy in STD rates. Whenever any data reflects negatively on women, they add some cope statement about how we shouldnt jump to conclusions and so on. I think @The Notorious SLAV even said at some point, this is so prevalent that other researchers have picked up on it - the constant excuse making in research for women.

Some other threads here also talked about how womens body count goes up when they think they are on a lie detector:

An Old Thread Revisited (Women's body count doubles on fake lie-detectors)

The thread: https://incels.is/threads/womens-partner-count-doubled-when-they-thought-they-were-hooked-up-to-a-lie-detector.209222/ The Study it refers to: https://www.amherst.edu/media/view/239672/original/Alexander+%26+Fisher+%282003%29.pdf The Articles linked in the thread: a) Article about...

incels.is

Misandry, Not Misogyny, is Rampant in Society (Study)

Analysis finds that across the board, there is pro-female bias in society. - research findings that report favorably on male traits are viewed as less credible - research that reports unfavorably on women is viewed as less credible - pro-female bias is deliberately misconstrued as being harmful...

incels.is

Analysis finds that across the board, there is pro-female bias in society.

Hiding sex differences: not a myth

Russell Warne has a new post: Implications of average group differences for the design of intelligence tests He writes: The implication is that if test creators can force an average difference to disappear for one pair of groups (i.e., males and females), then any differences or lack of differen

emilkirkegaard.dk

Hostile sexism is live and well, but mostly in favor of women

It's OK to be male

www.emilkirkegaard.com

Never forget stuff like the UN officially not considering female advantages in education and so on to be "inequality", but male advantages to be so. It's all so blatant.

 

[Morbilius]

Imagine having a fraction of the amount of testosterone a man has yet still ending up having a body count in the 100s jfl

 

[nihilum]

brutal std pill

 

[imlame]

It’s an honor to catch your attention, glad I’m not the only noticer

Thread blessed by the goat

Gotg

 

[Subhumantruecel67]

Women lie about their bodycounts obviously.

Women malinger even anonymous surveys, and you can track this by looking at something you CANT lie about, like STI prevalence.

If a woman says she has a bodycount of 6 it’s closer to 18.

Therefore the old rule of “take a woman’s purported bodycount and multiply it by 3” is actually accurate and not just and old and unreliable saying.


You COULD say this proves Hypergamy: if they’re all sleeping with the same men that have herpes because they fuck around so much, or you could say they just fuck 2-3x more than they say they do or about 2x what men do on average.

Either way Hypergamy is evident in medical literature and they even have their own cope for it “women are more susceptible to STDs” that’s the actual medical apologism.. they can’t get STDs from men that don’t have them so it’s not “susceptibility” it’s irresponsible sexual behavior and medicine bends over backwards to avoid this conclusion or don’t care to investigate the issue with any rigor because their explanation doesn’t even make sense.

View attachment 1726589View attachment 1726587

Iqcel thread

 

[parbate2025]

Imagine having a fraction of the amount of testosterone a man has yet still ending up having a body count in the 100s jfl

100 is like WHAT?
That vagina must be loose af

 

[Morbilius]

100 is like WHAT?
That vagina must be loose af

Looking like roast beef by this point

 

[lifeisfucked215]

I think both in part are true. The male anatomy makes it harder for men to get STDs and women are whores who sleep with a lot of partners and their anatomy makes it easier to get stds

 

[strange_to_be]

Disagree here. A vagina is not a penis. It's the literal interior of a person with all sorts of liquid and blood flow to let disease vs a skin tube.

The rates of gay bottoms is much higher than tops for HIV for the same reason. How much higher? Guess. 1.5x ? 2X? 5x? It's 12.5X higher

 

[Extern]

Disagree here. A vagina is not a penis. It's the literal interior of a person with all sorts of liquid and blood flow to let disease vs a skin tube.

The rates of gay bottoms is much higher than tops for HIV for the same reason. How much higher? Guess. 1.5x ? 2X? 5x? It's 12.5X higher

Yeah, it's much easier to catch STDs as a foid. Rare male W

 

[Man]

Disagree here. A vagina is not a penis. It's the literal interior of a person with all sorts of liquid and blood flow to let disease vs a skin tube.

The rates of gay bottoms is much higher than tops for HIV for the same reason. How much higher? Guess. 1.5x ? 2X? 5x? It's 12.5X higher

They have twice the STD rate while reporting half the partner count.

The risk difference is not 4x and you can’t get an STD from a man that does not have it.

That part is hard to explain but just think about it.