RageFuel Women claim that it takes more than looks to hold their attention, YET they also have a high drift rate when they're not entertained. It backfires.

[Pinpoint]

There's a chance when a girl says that that

-she's not fully aware of herself, and maybe it is true that she is IN REALITY someone who is superficial
-even if she's telling the truth then it probably takes looks PLUS entertainment, wits, charm, charisma, dominance bad boy game, etc.
-Women are unawaringly inconsistent. The chemical neurology in their brain is random. So even if they are self aware it can dissipate quickly.

The drift density of women is something to be aware of. When they have a high drift-density then they're not as responsive, they're not as communicating, they're not aslikely to be lenient. Their signalizations of communication, or distance are where real attraction is indicated. And it's not overt, fair, and ultimately is underhanded.

When it comes down to women though, the negative polarity/ negative returns of being open can sometimes justify the means of them doing it this way. But it still is a fucking annoying sad thing we have to deal with. We're past the year 2000, life is supposed to be ideal by now. And this liberal BS political correct humanitarian hardlocking that's happening is making it go in the opposite direction.

 

[AlexanderTheGreat11]

Who thought it was a good idea to give them rights?

 

[Justdone]

There's a chance when a girl says that that

-she's not fully aware of herself, and maybe it is true that she is IN REALITY someone who is superficial
-even if she's telling the truth then it probably takes looks PLUS entertainment, wits, charm, charisma, dominance bad boy game, etc.
-Women are unawaringly inconsistent. The chemical neurology in their brain is random. So even if they are self aware it can dissipate quickly.

The drift density of women is something to be aware of. When they have a high drift-density then they're not as responsive, they're not as communicating, they're not aslikely to be lenient. Their signalizations of communication, or distance are where real attraction is indicated. And it's not overt, fair, and ultimately is underhanded.

When it comes down to women though, the negative polarity/ negative returns of being open can sometimes justify the means of them doing it this way. But it still is a fucking annoying sad thing we have to deal with. We're past the year 2000, life is supposed to be ideal by now. And this liberal BS political correct humanitarian hardlocking that's happening is making it go in the opposite direction.

I have noticed women argue with there partners and me even after things were resolved for some reason it’s part of the reason I avoid them 90% of the time. Always scramble things and never own up completely they go back on their own word so I see them lose self awareness in situations where they know their wrong.

 

[ionlycopenow]

I cannot count the amount of times I see a woman clearly bored out of her mind with her average cuck bf in public

Sometimes they'll legit not even pay attention to what he's saying and start wandering off while the cuck gets bewildered

 

[Pinpoint]

I have noticed women argue with there partners and me even after things were resolved for some reason it’s part of the reason I avoid them 90% of the time. Always scramble things and never own up completely they go back on their own word so I see them lose self awareness in situations where they know their wrong.

They feign ignorance at everything they do, and start attacking when you piece things together AS IF you're fucking with something they're defending, which is their ignorance. And that thus proves they are trying to be ignorant. Which ultimately ends up with the moral that women are uncaring about what you do, and what you tried.

This is the regressionof the mean, the median regression point of primality. Generalizations try to find the perfect medium, and are not done just arbitrarily.
Women are either superficial awaringly, or hypocritically, and even if they're not they're still prone to be because dopamine is chaotic, and our receptors often can track around into the regression of the primal mean. Which means they'll either be superficial or selective in some way.